The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, April 09, 1973, Image 1
VOL LXDI-No. 46 University of South Carolina, Columbia, S. C. 29208 Monday. April 9. 1973
Entertainment, consisting of a barefoot
soft-shoe', several merry melodies and an
intermittent monolog, was provided by an
Athie tic Grouj
The Students Allocation Com- needs and desi
mittee (SAC) has formally pro- sity communit
tested subsidizing athletic . -That 1
groups it thinks the athletic tinue to subs
department should fund. sports and st
The letters of protest were that are of a
sent the athletic department, It said it wouk
the Trustees Athletic Commit- and other actii
tee, the Student-Faculty Athle- collegiate clas
tic Committee, President TomPrice,tl
Thomas Jones and clubs tment's spor
involved. director, said
The letter emphasizes the fol- fuon intercs
lowing sentiments of the 11- f,tenns, ba
member commission: golf, tennis, ba
-That the SAC has been sub- O
sidizing many athletic teams ball, whichn1
the university athletic depart- bal'hc
ment has been unwilling toa
fund..
-That the SAC disapproves
of this athletic department pol
icy of not financially assisting
all teams that are competing on TeBe
an intercollegiate level. The ora
-THAT THE SAC "firmly 8.
requests" that the Student
Faculty Athletic Committee Is IQ deti
(which it says has been ineffec- S.
tive in achieving changes in the
present dilemma) seek a
"viable solution," investigating
the possibilities of future finan
cial assistance that "would
more appropriately serve thea ______
Photos by Thomas Prkce
unidentified person Thursday afternoon,
in front of the Russell House, before an
estimated crowd of 100.
)s Funding Hit
res of the univer- NCAA (National Collegiate
v." Athletic Association) regula
he SAC will con- tions, do not receive athletic
idize only those department funds, according to
udent activities Prave.
club-like nature. Price noted that NCAA reg
I fund club sports ulations do not permit "anybi;
rities not of inter- who wants to play," as is the
sification. case with some_club sports.
ie athletic depar- ALAN ROSENBLUM, secret
ts information ary of SAC, noted that some
the department club sports want to remain inde
ate deprtin pendent of varsity control so
S mate sports in more students can participate.
*b s g However, SAC said because
aeball and track. of financial restrictions it can
i, such as rugby, not continue subsidizing athle
and girls basket- tics and "still fulfill its total
vere not under function."
Inside
ver and Shipley concert, was it a rowsing suc
lismal failure? For differing views see Page
Brmined by heredity or environment? See Page
Budget Requests
To Be Trimmed
BY PATRICK TYLER
News Editor
In a four-hour session Thursday the Student Allocations
Commission (SAC) approved two budgets, rejected another
and asked about half of the campus organizations requesting
funds for next year to come in and explain items in their
budgets.
The commission got down to business at 12:30 p.m. and
agreed to pass over the larger organizations that receive
the bulk of student funds. The Office of Student Activities
is predicting a total of $400,000 in student revenue for next
year, $40,000 of which automatically goes to student govern
ment. That leaves $360,000 to be distributed among the
30 campus groups whose requests total some $420,000.
That means approximately $80,000 will have to be trimed
out of the budget requests.
Rejected by the commission last week was a funding
request from the Council of Presidents, a coordinating body
for the dormitory governments on campus. It was first
moved that the council resubmit their budget showing their
total revenue since each residence hall charges dues vary
ing from $2.50 to $5. These dorm governments also receive
50 per cent of the profit from the concession machines
located in the dorms.
THAT MOTION was withdrawn, however, in favor of a
motion by University Union President Barney Oliver calling
for the rejection of the budget on the grounds that dorm
governments should not be funded by the commission which
represents all the students whether they live in dorms or
not. That motion carried.
Allan Rosenblum supported the motion saying "if they
want student funds they should give their dues to this
board."
Budgets passing in the afternoon session were those of
the University Players and the LeConte Geological Society.
The University Players which works in conjunction with
the drama department asked for a budget that is two and
a half times that of last year's. $2,000 of the extra funds
will go toward bringing the Broadway hit "Two Gentlemen
of Verona" to campus next year. Another $500 will go toward
a spring "renaissance" festival.
The LeConte Geological Society budget was passed after
an item was cut allowing that group to buy tents for their
expeditions. The reasoning here was that the group could
use the tents rented by the union and thus cut out duplica
tion. The final budget gave the group $400.
AFTER AN hour and a half break at 2 p.m. an observer
at the meeting from the Student Senate Finance Committee
read a number of protests to the commission concerning
items which have in the past been considered legitimate
by the commission. Robert Clarkson, student senator from
the law school, gave five suggestions to the board and asked
that.they be offered as motions by one or more of the voting
members of the commission.
Clarkson proposed the following: 1) That no student
money be budgeted for the purchase of alcoholic beverages.
2) That no money be budgeted for food or beverages except
in the case of programmed banquets. 3) That no funds be
budgeted for the direct or indirect support of charitable
institutions including fund raising drives and publicity for
those drives. 4) That some form of punishment be found
for those groups who violate their budget guidlines and
misuse their funds. 5) That no funds be budgeted for
stipends or honorariums within the smaller "non-working"
organizations.
THESE PROPOSALS brought critisms from the board and
no action was taken on them. Clarkson said that he would
work in the student senate to put pressure on the board
to institute these or similar proposals saying that he din't
think it was fair for the student body to pay for liquor and
food for other students, nor did he think it fair for the stu
dent body to support charities indirectly through fund rais
(See SA C Pa=e 6)