The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, February 19, 1973, Page Page 13, Image 13
All-America hopeful Kevin
over Villanova's Tom Inge]
All-America aspirant, in Cai
Ingelsb
but win
BY STEVE PARKER
Sports Editor
Tom Ingelsby couldn't manage a
solo upset of the Carolina
Gamecocks Saturday afternoon as
his Villanova squad suffered
through a 77-53 loss, but he sure
attempted it.
The 6-3 senior Wildcat guard
pumped in 31 points despite some
tough defenses thrown at him by the
Gamecocks. Although his 31 points
PN
Studen
TU'
All-Americ h P.M. Ke'til
Y STE EAK
solo upet ofak the arlin
ateptatorFec re,t
4510DEV N EE
'he great one
Joyce shoots victory over ti
sby, another noon in the Co
olina's 77-53 and seven ass
had 31 points.
y did eve
game foi
did not beat the USC total of 77,
Ingelsby did best the scoring output
of his teammates, who collectively
added just 22 points.
Ingelsby was forced to hurl 30
field goal attempts up into the air,
most from long range, and he con
nected on exactly half. "Some of the
shots I didn't want to take," said
Ingelsby, "But I was forced to do
so, because the rest of the guys just
weren't hitting.
INA
'Night
DAY
Closing
IAL
DINNER
19
With Student I0
price. Served with baked
ed sazad and bread.
YOU ARE
DRIVE IN CAYCE
ID-JUST OFF 1-26
T-EAST COLUMBIA
Geoff Darling
S
te Wildcats Saturday after
liseum. Joyce had 16 points
ists in the game, Ingelsby
rything
'Cats
"The other guys have a shoot a
reasonable percentage to keep us in
the game," continued Ingelsby, "but
we were unable to do it today. Look
at the statistics, at halftime we have
three guys (Larry Moody, Mike
Connellv. and Ed Hastings) who
were 0-13 between them."
It was obvious that Ingelsby's
teammates were not contributing
nearly enough to the Wildcat attack
as they hit just 10 of 48 shots. Even
the Villanova backcourt ace's
strong showing could pull his team's
shooting percentage up to only .321
for the contest.
"Carolina was playinga real good
defense," explained Ingelsby.
"Most teams play us in a man
to-man defense but they came out
in that real tough zone and I think
that had to contribute to why we
shot so poorly. They are a lot bigger
team then we are, they have
superior talent."
Villanova's team has now lost nine
of its last 10 outings, but at one point
in the season they held a slate of
6-0. Ingelsby offered reasons for
the turnabout. "Early in the season
our defense was our key, we were
holding teams way below their scor
ing averages but we aren't doing
that as well now, and our own scor
ing has never been as it should."
(See INGELSBY, Page 15)
Easy To Open
Gamecock
Charge Account,
*100
(Limit)
BRITTONES
SSteve Parker|
The weakness of a time clock
It has been quite a time since Dr. James Naismith put
up a peach basket in his gym class and invented the game
of basketball, but it seems as if even now nobody can quite
agree on what the rules of the game should be. Nowhere
is this more obvious than in the differences on the profes
sional and collegiate levels of play.
The most notable of the rule differences in the two levels
is the lack of a shooting clock on the college courts. The
pros have a clock which forces the offensive team to attempt
a field goal about once every half minute, but the colleges
have chosen not to adapt such a rule.
However, it seems as if the colleges are leaning toward
the adaption of such a rule within a few years, and in many
ways that seems a shame. Already the Big-Eight Conference
is using a 30-second shooting clock, such as the American
Basketball Association uses, and the coaches in the confer
ence seem to like the clock they are using on an experimen
tal basis in league games this season.
For every coach that defends the absence of the clock,
you could probably locate two that are in favor of its adapta
tion.
Strategy is lost
But why? The obvious reason is to speed the game up,
forcing much more offense which supposedly attracts more
fans, and prevents the stall game. But in serving this pur
pose the clock weakens the game in other aspects. The most
outstanding losses are from a strategic standpoint as
coaches would lose their perrogative of slowing the action
down and defending a lead that their team has gained.
But there are other aspects of the game which would
suffer from a time clock. For one thing, the zone defense
would have to be outlawed, as it is in the pro ranks. The
zone is a superior defense for most teams and if offensive
squads were forced to hurriedly throw up outside shots
against it, there would probably be alot more lower scoring
contests. Simply because outside attempts are of course
more difficult to connect on.
Outlawing the zone, a necessary move for a shooting
clock, forces teams to play man-to-man always, a defense
wh.ch is notably weaker since it opens up the middle and I
leaves it vulnerable to penetration. Also in a man-to-man,
a single pick can spring an offensive player wide open
toward the basket, but a zone enables the defenders to easily
assist in their coverage of a potential shooter.
The outlawing of the zone and the adaption of a clock
are moves designed only to stress offensive basketball.
They attempt to make the game flashy and high-scoring,
but there is alot more to basketball than just scoring.
The two pro moves have made such parts of the game
as ball-handling, strategy and especially defense take a back
seat to offense. The game is not just offense.
Stalling presents no cause
And the adaption of a clock to prohibit stalling seems
in itself a foolish move. The stall game is relatively rare;
there have of course been some real standouts such as
Maryland's 31-30 victory over USC a few years back, and
the victory of N.C. State over Duke, 12-10, in the ACC tourna
ment, but such games are the exception and what harm
did they really do the game?
If anything, they made two contests which should have
been routs into close upsets. A victory for two coaches who
(See PARKER, Page 14)
Free Draft Beer
To ladies every Wed. night
-,al nite
20c PER BEER - HEIDELBERG ON TAP - WED. NIGHTS
Mamas Little
Pump Room
215 Pickens Street
Happy Hour Daily - 5 to 6,