The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, February 01, 1973, Page Page 6, Image 6
Letters to
Dear Sir:
I'm not in the habit of taking
Gamecock editorials serious
ly;but last Thursday's paper
contained an editorial that I feel
is a drastic misrepresentation
of the truth. I refer to Billy
Cox's letter, entitled "Where's
that Spirit?" concerning USC
basketball and the USC athletic
program.
First of all, I resent Cox's
assumption that "Carolina bas
ketball is simply not what it
used to be, and everyone in
Columbia knows it." That's a
pile of bullshit. It's probably
true that Carolina fans aren't
quite as enthusiastic this year,
a d there have been some empty
seats in the Coliseum, but that's
what happens in an off year for
Carolina basketball compared
to previous seasons.
As far as our "weak"
schedule is concerned, it may
be weaker than ACC schedules,
but it's still one of the toughest
in the nation. Maybe Cox should
take another look and find out
just who we play.
Next, Cox's suggestion to re
enter the ACC is one of the most
assinine Ibve ever heard. I per
sonally would welcome more
local teams on our basketball
schedule, like Clemson and Fur
man, but the ACC is definitely
no solution to that. The 800 rule
wasn't the only reason we left
the conference. The ACC.
always was, has been, and will
be a jinx to Carolina athletics.
EDITOR'S NOTE: This copy of
Ben Baggott Jr.'s letter to The
State newspaper was sent to the
Gamecock in response to a Jan.
25 editorial.
Dear Sir:
In The State's January 25th
editorial Key Principle
Involved In Dietzel Pact Deb
ate, The State took the position
that the trustees of the Univer
sity of South Carolina had vio
lated South Carolina's Freedom
Letters
Welcome
Letters to the editor on
topics are welcome but
subject to editing and
condensation to meet
style and space require
ments. All letters must
be typed and must be
signed with the full
name, address and phone
number of the author.
Unsigned letters or
those with pseudonyms
will not be printed.
The letters should be
addressed to Letters To
the Editor, The
Gamecock, Drawer A,
USC, Columbia, S.C.,
29208.
the editor
If Cox had stopped there, I
probably could have overlooked
his stupidity. But his statement
that we at Carolina "don't have
a whole lot to be proud of in the
field of sports these days" is one
of the biggest lies I've ever seen
in print. USC has at this time
an extremely good athletic
program. In fact, football is our
only losing program. Not only
do we have a nationally
powerful basketball team, but
last year all of our spring sports
had at least a winning season,
most of them going consider
ably beyond just a winning sea
son. And this year, most or all
of the spring sports are
expected to do even better. If
that's not enough for you, Cox,
look at our women s athletic
program and you'll find
undefeated teams, champion
ship teams, and consistent win
ners.
All this is what we have to be
Cox. Judging from your editor
ial, you're nothing but a traitor
to the spirit that you were so
gallantly defending.
One more thing. You were
wrong about McGuire's being
just a "good coach"; Frank
McGuire is a genius. And
genius shouldn't be tampered
with.
FRED MERRITT
EDITOR'S NOTE: Billy Cox's
letter was a letter to the editor
and not a Gamecock editorial.
of Information Act. This may
indeed be true but there are
several areas of this problem
which need closer examination
before your conclusion may be
considered valid
The actions you cite as being
in violation with the F.O.I. are
both defensible. First, the
trustees may have held execu
tive session not to discuss their
news access policy but to dis
cuss what they considered a
personnel matter. This is per
missible under the F.O.I. Act.
The State contends that discus
sions concerning contracts of
employes are privileged but not
the final action taken..
The University may however
consider itself a Corporation
and therefore a separate entity
It is intuitively obvious that
the trustees are withholding
certain information from the
public but is U.S.C. getting
away with ignoring the F.O.I.
Act as your editoral states?
The F.O.I. Act allows the
courts to issue injunctions
against violators. If the State
feels that the University is in
blatant violation of this Act it
should use the legal safeguard
(an injunction) provided for in
the Act. The State should go to
court and seek an injunction to
obtain the requested records if
the University is required to
produce them.
BEN H. B_AGGTTJR.
BLOOD DONORS
NEEDED!
IMMEDIATE CASH
PAYMENT
Age Limitations, 18-60
NEW HOURS
9:30 a.m. 'til 5 p.m. Mon.-Fri.
CAROLINA BLOOD BANK
1317 Taylor 923-622
McCabe and Mrs
Genuine
FILM PREVIEW
BY DAVID SIMPSON
The Hollywood Western has
come a long way since Bronco
Billy Anderson was shot off of
his horse in the 1902 picture,
The Great Train Robbery,
There has been John Wayne's
shot to stardom in John Ford's
epic Stagecoach, the never end
ing series of "B" westerns of
the 50's, and the transition of
the Hollywood western to the
spaghetti western. A couple of
years ago, however, the west
ern brought on a new look-that
of a psychological as well as a
sociological study. The film
that presented this view was
Robert Aldrich's McCabe and
Mrs. Miller. Together with a
fine script, striking photo
graphy, taut direction, and mar
velous performances, McCabe
is perhaps one of the most
genuine and enjoyable west
erns ever made.
'The Gre
critical C
THE GREAT TRAIN
ROBBERY.
FILM PREVIEW
BY 4DAVID SIMPSON
The Great Dictator was
Charlie Chaplin's first all talk
ing motion picture and also
marked a critical change in the
Chaplin style, for he undertook
a role unlike that of his previous
characters-that of a dictator,
resembling Adolph Hitler. In
the true Chaplin style, however,
he turns his character inside
out, grasping every opportunity
to convey true comedy while
making his character wholly
believable.
Made in 1940, The Great Dic
tator was meant as a scathing
satire on Hitler, portraying him
as a small man (everything and
everybody are twice as big as
he is) with very grandoise ideas.
When it was released, however,
many critics found it distasteful
for making fun of a man who
had put Germany back on the
map .. But Chaplin, a socialist,
realized the ultimate goals of
sUch Fascists, and exhibited his
thoughts in one of the most fam
ous scenes in movie his
Easy To Open
Gamecock
Charge Account
* 100
(LUmit)
BRITTON S
. Miller
and enjoj
Situated in a small mining
town in the northwest United
States, the picture focuses on a
small time gambler making the
most from the gullible
townspeople, and a prostitude,
who coerces the gambler into
financing her business and
splitting the profits. All goes
well until some big time hoods
(the forerunners of the Mafia)
want to buy out the business.
Faced with the possibility of sel
ling out or getting shot, the gam
bler struggles with his hidden
conscience, reaching a conclu
sion he has never had the
strength to face before.
Warren Beatty as McCabe,
gives one of his finest perfor
mances, rivalling that of Clyde
Barrow in Bonnie and Clyde.
His portrayal of the two-bit
cowardly gambler torn between
his own interests and the alure
of the mysterious Mrs. Miller
is perfect. The peak is reached
when he must accept violence
at Dictato
haplin sty
tory-that of the little dictator
dancing with the world globe.
In addition to Chaplin's antics
is the added advantage of Jack
Oakie's portrayal of a Mussolini
caricature. Upon his entrance
it is a rival battle between Chap
lin and him. It is Oakie's perfor
mance, in fact, that keeps The
Great Dictator from becoming
mediocre.
Chaplin also portrays a Jew
ish barber who is harassed by
the dictators troops. His por
trayal is reminiscent of his
"tramp" character but falls
short of it. It seems as if Chap
lin were concentrating his main
efforts on the title character.
Chaplin also, for the first
time, voices his true feelings
toward totalitarian rule in a
highly propagandist scene. It is
this scene, in fact, that has led
many reviewers to criticize the
film, for it does markedly differ
from the whole of the film.
The Great Dictator is cer
tainly not Chaplin's best film
for it was a bold experiment in
a time when the world was
ready to explode into an inter-*
national war. For this Chaplin
from us . . .somewhkere th
experienced v\oitresses. Let
gistering wth our Dial-a-\til
calling 787-9721 - anytirme
{able
in order to save his own life.
Julie Christie is stunning as
the frizzy-haired prostitute
whose only escape from over
powering reality is the local
opium den. It is a performance
that is captivating yet disturb
ing.
Special notice must go to the
beautiful camera work through
out the picture. Tinted with a
yellowish tone to enhance the
authenticity, McCabe is visu
ally haunting and moody. cap
turing a part of the west rarely
seen. .
McCabe and Mrs. Miller is a
film not to be missed. Not only
has director Aldrich captured
the full richness of the locale,
but has also given the viewer
two of the finest perfor
mances given by two of the fin
est performers in films today.
McCabe and Mrs. Miller
plays this Friday and Saturday
nights at the Russell,House
Theatre. Admission is $.75. Its
worth it.
r' marks
lechange
must be appreciated. Still
Chaplins's performance of the
little dictator with big ideas and
Oakie's portrayal of a fat Fas
cist are two of the immortal
characters in screen history. It
is a film to see, for it is Chaplin,
himself. The Great Dictator
opens this Friday night at the
Gamecock II, the first in a
series of fine films being pre
sented only in the Columbia
area.
The Gamecock is
looking for reporters,
preferably with experi
ence in news writing,
in political science,
English, history,
sociology, psychology
and business. For
information call Patrick
Tyler at 777-8178.
E ATIP
3re are restaurants that need
Js help them find you by re
ress service. Give us a tip by
- day or night.
DIA L-A-SE RVICE
DIAL -A - WAIRESS