The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, July 27, 1972, Image 1
VOL. LXII - NO. 92 University of South Carolina, Columbia, S. C. 29208 Thursday, July 7, 1972
IA
1. 1
'I + f, r"
-i - -A- -
- 1
F f"
L -I
'L:'
Miller
I.
A1'
Main tena
'only whet
By NICK PARHAM
In 1962, Rachel Carson published
SILENT SPRING, an inditement of our
pesticide policies. Though the issue has
fallen from public prominence, the debate
continues among experts: is the human
race unwittingly killing itself through the
umproper use of pesticides?
Major developments have resulted from
the debate, not the least of which was the
government's ban on DDT useage. Natural
controls using weather, birds, insects and
natural preditors have been experimented
with as an alternative to pesticide use.
The man in charge of USC's pesticide
program seems to have a moderate stand
on pesticides. Neil Miller, a Clemson
graduate with a B. S. in Horticulture,
thinks that, "you have to have controls one
way or another" but strongly asserts that
"DDT will never be used while I am here."
Miller's methods of control lean toward
the use of systemics. Instead of external
spraying, systemics are taken up through
the plant's roots and are only harmful to
leaf-eating insects. Miller forsees the day
when "we'll go all the way to systemics
(on campus)."
While systemics were developed to kill
only leaf-eating insects, they also find
their way into the systems of animals
which eat the dead insects. Miller does not
know the number of insects needed to
rice sprays
i necessary'
harm an animal but assured this reporter
ii would take a great deal.
The main chemicals used on USC's
campus are malathion, sevin, cygon, and
disyston with the latter in heaviest use.
Many pesticides would be relatively
harmless if not for the frequent over-doses
and un-necessary spraying which occurs.
For example, DDT was frequently
sprayed in such haphazard ways that it
was carried to other areas by rainwater
runoff. It gradually built up into dangerous
concentrations in both the area in which it
was sprayed and in the area into which it
was carried.
According to Miller, the maintenence
department sprays "only when we have a
reason to spray." He emphasized that he
'personally'' measures out all pesticides
and only "very reliable" workers are
allowed to spray.
Clemson University is accepted as the
siate's authority on pest control and USC
has traditionally relied on this authority
for advice. This dependence obviously has
:Is pit falls as well as its advantages.
Exemplifing the hazards, John Dean of
The biology department pointed out that
the chemical used on fire ants - Mirex - is
widely considered a "disaster" en
vironmentally. But the state Department
of Agriculture and Clemson both continue
io promote the chemical's use.
On the other hand, Dean states that the
horticulturist has no course other than to
"rely on the professionals".
An interesting experiment in natural
pest control is underway at the University
of Southern Florida. The grounds
department there has placed 1,000 praying
mantis eggs around the campus. The
mantis is exclusively carnivorous and
hopefully should help strike a balance
between insects and pests. Results of the
experiment will not be known for several
years.
Miller remains somewhat sceptical of
narural pest controls. He maintains that
''1o date there are no real natural ways of
control.'' He prefers to follow his method
of limited and controlled spraying.
When asked about the future, he agreed
hat, ''we probably will have some natural
ways of destroying insects.''
The debate surrounding pesticide use
continues with years of research
necessary before any final conclusions can
be made. Though natural controls are
being introduced, there is no doubt that
chamical pesticides will be with us for a
long time to come. In striking a balance
beiween the two extremes, USC's methods
of moderate use only when necessary
seem,s to be a safe stand for the present.