The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, April 17, 1972, Page Page 3, Image 3
Male's rebuttal
to women's lib
D9AR MS. MILLER:
I must say, I was extremely
amused by the number of
responses to my March 22nd letter
concerning male superiority. In
the interest of clarifying my
position for the benefit of those who
cared enough to write, I feel
obligated to offer this rebuttal.
Since there were so many of you
who responded, I cannot possibly
answer each one of your attacks
,nor do I desire to do so since most
of them were of such inferior
calibre anyway. There were,
however, several letters which I
thought were worthy of comment. I
Would like to thank Frederica
Green for withholding her wrath (a
difficult task, it seems, for a
female) and for politely at
tempting to inform me of so many
ideas of which I am so obviously
ignorant. Save it sweetheart, I've
heard it all before. I was amazed at
all of the attempts made to analyze
me because of my views on a
certain issue. Really, that's very
un-American.
In regard to Miss Ginger
Sigma N
Pr
L11
51
BICYCR
April
2:0
FI
$25.00 - 1st I
CARNIVAL C
"LITTLE HOl
MISS LITTL
BIG500 RACE (
MANYFREEPRI
Everyone on
Proceeds donated to M4
GAME
The GAMECOCK is published
semesters with the exception of Ul
Changes of address forms, subscr
should be sent to Drawer A, USC,
$3 per semester or $6 for both some
GAMECOCK this year received S
entitling full-time students to a sul
GAMECOCK are in Rooms 316 i
University campus. Phones are 7'i
class postage paid at Columbia,
publication of the students of the Un
official publication of the Universi
not necessarily represent those of I
staff members of the GAMECOCH
Editor..... .. .. .. ....
.Managing Editor.... .. .. ..
Associate Editor.... .. .. ..
Assistant Managing Editor ....
Business Managor.... .. .. ..
Sports Editor... .. .. .. ..
Asst. Sports Editor .. .. .. ..
Photo Editor... .. .. .. ..
Chief Reporter... .. .. . ...
News Editors.... .. .. .. ..
Feature Editor... .. .. .. ..
Circulation . . . . . . . ...
Classified Advertising. .. ..
Staff Writers. .. .. .. .. ....Lar
Gilbert, Bob Grondahi, Barbar
Niewidaomski, Ellen Murray, Kri
Wilson, Ann Winters, Debbie Krell,
and Fran Zupan.
Sports Writers.. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Photographers. .. .. .. .. ..Courtei
Advertising Manager.. .. ..
Brown's invitation for me to attend
her Women's Lib short course, let
me say that I must decline for I
have no real desire to publicly
embarrass Constance Meyers
'whoever she may be). Besides,
anyone working on a doctorate in
history can't be too intelligent
anyway, regardless of sex. Just
because I'm an intelligent male
(which you shouldn't have quoted
since I never said it) doesn't mean
I have to go to your goddamn short
course and back up anything. If
you want to talk to me, you bring
your short course over to my place.
Another point was raised con
cerning matriarchy in certain
Indian tribes in the sourtheast. In
answer to Georgeana Mim's
question of where I was at that
time, I wasn't born yet. Where
were you, Mims, when they threw
them all into reservations? That's
another issue though. By the way,
I'm sorry my letter made you
throw up; you weren't supposed to
eat it.
Finally, since I'm becoming
increasingly bored with this whole
affair, let me just say that since so
many of you people seem con
cerned with having me find a dog,
Fraternity
sents
rTLE
DO
K RACE
19th, 1972
0-5:00
eld A
'RIZE & TROPHY
AMES & PRIZES
WHEELS" RACE
.E 500 CONTEST
ENTRY FEE $5.00)
ZESFOREVERYONE
campus invited.
tropolitan Education Fund
ri-weekly during the fall and spring
riiversity holidays and exam periods.
iption requests and other mail items
Columbia, S.C. Subscription rates are
sters. Bulk copies are $6 per 100. The
50,000 from the student activity fund,
scription to the paper. Offices of the
ind 318 of the Russell House on .the
7-8178, 777-4249 and 777-3888. Second
5.C. Although the GAMECOCK is a
Iversity of South Carolina,' it is not an
ty. The opinions expressed herein do
pUniversity, the student body, or all
-.-.-.-.-......Glenda Miller
..-.-.-.-.-.-.-.....Jim Farrell
...-.-..-.......John T. Gash
-..-..-........ Sharon Givens
...-..-..-. .. ..Ute Huckabee
-.-.-... .. ...Q.oug Williams'
-........--.. .. .. Steve Parker
-..-... .. .. ....Tom Price
.... .. .. .. ..Rusty Robinson
-...-... .. .. Karin Burchstead
Vicki Thomas
-..-.-.-... .. .....ob Craft,
-.-.-.-.-.. ....Monty Preston
-.-.-.-.. ....Patty McGuillian
ry Evans, K. Wayne Ford, Armida
a Murray, Ruthie Lyon, Judie
i Schweickert, Sharon Edsell, Beth
Betty Woodruff, Charlie Fellenbaum,
Bill Grant, Jim Hersh, Gary West,
Veron Whitm ire
iy Dicely, Doug Holladay, Alan Hui,
teve K ish, Lewis Phillips, Murray Sill
-..-.-.-.. .. .. ..Art Frank
Letters
perhaps I should start looking right
here on this campus. There seem
to be a lot of bitches running
around here.
PAUL RANSOHOFF
'Project Preston'
sirs objections
DEAR MS. MILLER
During recent weeks there have
been several rumors about a
proposal to change Preston into a
coed honor dorm. "Project
Preston: A proposal for improving
the academic atmosphere in
Carolina Residences" by the ad
hoc Committee on Project Preston,
a memo that attempts to explain
(or defend, according to which side
one takes) the reationale behind
this experiment says simply that
"we have selected Preston College
. . for this project." Numerous
other references to this mysterious
"'we"t are evident in this memo.
Not until the third page does one
find these unsigned, anonymous
persons "Propose" something
rather than pronounce their
unilateral decision.
As a poor, uninformed (and
probably "homeless" by next
semester) "Prestonite," 1 would
like to know:
1. Who are the "we" who have
made this apparently unilateral
decision?
2. Were any of these "we"
residents of Preston or
representatives of Preston's dorm
government?
3. Why were the students of
Preston not polled to see how they
felt about being thrown out
(evicted if you prefer or "moved"
if you -wish to be nauseatingly
- euphemistic) of "their" dorm.
4. When will we, the residents
of Preston, know what final action
has been taken by the Board of
Trustees, the administration, and
the Housing Office? (I realize that
students are "society's niggers"
but really even a person as
despicable and lowly as a student
needs to make some plans about
COURSE and II
APRIL 12~
STUDENTS...
TO PARTICIPA
The Eva
Regular
Indeperi
And Ind4
where he is going to live next
semester.)
5. Has anyone polled the
"honor students' to see what they
think of the present proposal?
What is an honor student? A 3.0?
Come now, with standards what
they are here, that would be a
farce. I feel that there is little
correlation between grades and
whether a person is here to learn or
only to get a diploma.
I doubt that my small voice will
stop or even impede in any way the
"progress" embodied in "Project
Preston." I support the idea of
turning Preston into a coed dorm. I
support the idea of phasing in
honor students of all disciplines
while phasing out the present
residents of Preston.
My objections are: 1. The
manner in which the Project has
been handled (complete lack of
concern for students already
residing in Preston who wish to
return; apparent lack of in
formation on what the student
body as a whole desires; (lack of
publicity). 2. Possible faulty
reasoning. (The purpose of a
university, as opposed to a college,
is to give the student exposure to
more diverse disciplines (this is
the reason BA majors are required
to take a large number of liberal
arts, sciences and outside elective
courses) yet Project Preston's
apparent purpose is to homogenize
rather than diversify ex
periences.)
3. The possibility that Preston
will be turned into a residence for
the sole purpose of allowing
socializing among special groups
(i.e., an unofficial frat) I notice
references to language majors,
poetry, theatre, arts and crafts,
and a grant from the National
Endowment for the Humanities. Is
this dorm to be just for arts and
sciences students in the
Humanities?
Again I say, come now! The
general feeling among
Engineering, BA and Pharmacy
students is that Humanities is an
easy ride. An honor dorm for
Humanities? How about just a
dorm for Humanities special in
4STRUCTOR EN
THIS WEEK
th through APRIl
URGE YOUR PR
TE!!
dluation Will Inch
Courses Except L
dent Studies Cour
pendent Research
terest groups? 'hmt dwem't sund
as nice as the mow job the ecm
mittee blows out ove a, hd N sort
of-comes down to wh r em likes
candy pills forced don one's
throat or bitter pills ftooed down
one's throat. You may tahe the
sugar coated variety if you Eke, I
prefer mine 'like it is."
Of course, I may he misin
terpreted what this emml.ee is
doing. If so, the fault is ther for
their failure to 0.1 .e in
formation, not mine fr being
concerned about a situ.ti. vital to
every resident of Ptvs9m, in
cluding me.
JOHNCANADAY
A message
for Craft
DEAR MS. MIJLER:
A message for Bob Craft: cram
it.
DENNIS A. WALSH
One more
for Craft
DEAR MS. MILLER:
I get so damn tired of your
editorial writers' attempts to
imitate the style of the
GAMECOCK, and ther effrts to
degrade your rag ewm further
than it is already.
The sole purpose o&4Ms letter,
though, is to single out Bob Craft
for attack and to ca lim ames,
as follows:
(This is a brief spiel writt In an
apoplectic fit, degrading the
name of Bob Caft, all of the
garbage that he has eer written,
his sex life, his gea-gy:ch to
seventeen generations, he way he
performs bodily f mt, and his
mentality.)
I was wrong whe I said that was
all I was going to write about. It
seems that there are a few people
on campus (letter-writers at least)
that do not want uak athietes to
play on their beloved tesm, and
will fight like the devil to keep
them.ff the team. Al I can say to
them is that I am NOT leaving
Carolina; you're not gettWg rid of
us that easily.
STANLEY M. HOULINIEAD
'ALUATION
. 21st
OFESSORS
ide All
ses (399)
(498 or 499).