The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, March 15, 1972, Page Page 2, Image 2
GLENDA MILLER
INTERIM EDITOR
JIM FARRELL ART FRANK
MGN. ED. 4 AD MANAGER
EDITORIALS
Women 's rights
This campus is witnessing a very healthy rise in concern
for women's rights, an issue this entire nation has ignored
too long.
The National Organization for Women, met recently. It's
primary goal, a spokeswoman said, is the passage of
an Equal Rights Amendment to the federal constitution.
Most notably, the lack of women on the governing bodies
of state supported universities was listed as a reason for
the group's birth. And if NOW should develop political
clout, there could be some interesting changes in the
makeup of our Board of Trustees -- much needed changes.
Several weeks ago, a Women in Focus Week was held,
with debates and panel discussions. Although it was
poorly attended and probably inadequately publicized, it
was another small step in increasing awareness of
everyone who has so far been unconcerned.
Monday night, another women's rights organization
began their campaign. The Women's Equity Action
League (WEAL) shows a lot of promise, if for no other
reason than its backing by Paula Treder, a very sharp
architect from Rock Hill whose qualifications and
reputation would make many males blush, shuffle their
feet and say "Gosh, I guess women ain't as bad as I
thought."
Even Student Government has gotten to the act by
creating the -cabinet position of Secretary of Women's
Student Affairs. Through the efforts ofVickie Eslinger and
others a Health and Abortion Hotline has been established,
(one of the few university hotlines in the country) which
has been extremely successful. There is no way to tell how
many pregnant girls have been saved from a back-alley
butcher because of it.
This university, among all its other faults, is possibly
one of the most sexist institutions around. A recent bill
which must clear the U.S. Senate could cause federal funds
to be cut off from all public supported schools which
discriminate against women. Federal funds being the
lifeblood of poor schools in poor states like South Carolina,
perhaps some administrators better wake up or they
might find themselves looking the wrong way down the
edge of an unemployment check. Poetic justice.
Why we use Ms.
Many persons have written The Gamecock and
questioned the use of Ms. when referring to women.
This is not a radical idea nor is it entirely connected with
the women's liberation movement although it is respon
sible for the term Ms. The Gamecock has adopted this
policy because it feels that there is a lot of discrimination
between sexes and a lot of traditional sex roles are no
longer pertinent.
For example, women are no longer expected to stay in
the home and unquestioningly obey her master, the
husband. Today women are being recognized as intelligent
individuals capable of holding responsible positions in the
world.
With this in mind changes must be made. If women are
to compete with men on an equal basis, there must be a
drastic reduction in sexual discrimination. One way to do
this is not to designate a women as married or single.
A man's title, Mr., does not reveal his marital status. The
title Ms. does not reveal a woman's maritial status.
The Gamecock's journalistic guide is the AP Stylebook,
the same guide used by most professional newspapers.
This book says that when first referring to a man in a news
story his first and last name will be used and in successive
references he will be referred to by his last name only.
The Gamecock has adopted this policy for women also.
This is not a totally women's lib stand but a progressive
step toward equality. . .
Guest column
Athletics.
(Editor's note: This editorial
originally appeared in The
Greenville News.)
The University of South
Carolina's recent "Dietzel crisis,"
which ended when football coach
and athletic director Paul Dietzel
announced he would remain at the
Carolina athletic helm, stirred up
as much, perhaps more comment
and controversy than the com
bined Bortolazzo incident and
reported efforts to fire University
President Thomas Jones.
That is a sad commentary on
higher education in South Carolina
these days, when so much needs to
be done to expand educational
opportunities for this state's young
people. It indicates there is more
interest in football than in post
high school education, both
academic and technical
vocational.
How else is it possible to account
for the uproar which arose when
the chairman of the USC Board of
Trustees revealed that Coach
Dietzel was considering and being
considered for the position of coach
of the professional Denver
Broncos?
The state of higher education in
South Carolina, now receiving
considerable attention from the
State Commission on Higher
Education, the Technical
The watermark
F 0 0
iresign
By BOB CRAFT
Feature Editor
If you have ever listened to the
Firesign Theatre and wondered
what it would be like if they made a
movie, you had a chance to see
what is might be like Monday
evening in the Russell House
Theatre with the showing of two
movies, "Duck Soup" and "Horse
Feathers" both starring the Marx
Brothers.
It would be safe to say that the
prevailing mood in these pictures
is one of complete madness,
that is perpetrated by Groucho,
Chico, and Harpo and Zeppo upon
I'
I'EJI
FLU
educatio:
Education Center program and
many legislators, amounts to a
crisis of the first magnitude,
directly affecting the lives and
fortunes of all this state's young
people. The way numerous con
flicting interests are resolved and
post high school education is
structured will help dtetermine
how future generations will fare in
South Carolina.
Yet this crisis in educational
opportunity causes no more,
maybe less, public interest and
comment than the "Dietzel crisis"
of recent days. It was appalling
to read the aggrieved comment of
USC Trustee Michael J. Mungo,
who said he was "shocked" that
Coach Dietzel was considering
dropping a 12-year contract with
USC despite numerous expensive
athletic facility improvements
made at Dietzel's request. Mungo
estimated that "about 70 percent of
the total trustee man hours spent
in meetings have been over
athletic problems of one nature or
another."
There are those who honestly
feel that successful football and
basketball programs are essential
to the state's universities in order
at attract favorably national at
tention. "We have to try to be first
in something, so why not
athletics?" is one reaction heard
Theatre 4
sane, but somewhat pompous
people.
Imagine a great ceremonial
state reception with ambassadors
and princes and duchesses who
have all come to see the in
stallation of a new prime minister
who is Groucho. Now imagine
Groucho Marx in his rumbled
black suit sliding down a firepole
into the middle of the ballroom
asking a footman if they're ex
pecting anyone. The dialogue,
especially between Groucho and
Chico is filled with puns, non
sequiturs and generally screwed
up sentences. Groucho will ask
n in S.C.
quite often in this state.
Well, why not trying to be first in
some phase of education?
It is fairly obvious that pressure
for successful athletic programs is
stronger at Carolina than at other
institutions of higher learning in
the state. But pressure also is
intense at Clemson University and
sometimes.tends to get out of hand
there as well as at USC.
Something clearly is amiss when
a trustee estimates that people
charged with operating USC spend
more time on athletic problems
than anything else. It is solid
evidence of a dire need to change
priorities and attitudes which
determine priorities in this state.
USC officals alone are not
responsible for existing priorities
and attitudes, although they must
bear their share of the onus. The
real responsibility rests upon the
elected officals of South Carolina,
legislative and administrative, and
upon the people who put and keep
elected representatives in office.
South Carolina needs to do some
hard thinking about and hard work
on numerous educational and
training programs and
problems,including all phases of
higher education. It's high time to
concentrate on that and de
emphasize that false importance of
university athletics.
3n fiM6
Chico a riddle and by the time the
bit is through, Chico will have
Groucho giving the answer and
being stumped at his own riddle.
Or Chico in the witness stand
asking the prosecuting attorney,
"Hey you-a know what has a four
legs, a trunk anna lives in the
circus?" To which the prosecuter
shouts, "That's irrelevant!" To
which Chico replies, "Hey you
gotta it right!"
Or Groucho trying to get by
Chico, the doorkeeper in a
speakeasy. "You can no getta in,
unless you gimme the password
swordfish," says Chico. "Well,
then, I give up," says Groucho, " is
it ,swordfish?" Chico lets Groucho
in and after some footwork Chico is
on the outside and Groucho is
looking through the hole in the
door.
Chico says, "Let me in, Sword
fish" To which Groucho replies, Ah
no, I got tired of that. I changed
it," and he closes the window.
The silent Harpo had his share of
bits, too. He has a fight with a
lemonade vendor who turns over
his roasted peanut stand, after
Harpo has burned the lemonade
vendor's straw hat with the flame
he uses to roast peanuts. The
lemonade vendor laughs at Harpo
and then goes back to selling his
lemonade.
As the vendor ladles out his
lemonade, he notices the large 0
crowd in front of his stand
dissipating. He turns around and
see Harpo wading in his large glass
vat of lemonade.
And then of course, is one of the
most marvelous bits in motion
comedy, the mirror scene in Duck
Soup.
In this bits, Harpo is disguised as
Groucho (don't ask me why, it's
too complicated to explain) and
they confront each other, and
whichever way Groucho moves,
Harpo anticipates him and does
the same. It has to be seen to be
believed.
.( tontinued on page 3)