The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, January 21, 1972, Page Page 3, Image 3
exclusively
save 5.01 o
corduroy fl
5
ori
Davison's does it again--anoi
corduroy flare leg jean for
streamlined fit. Choice of
pinwale corduroy. Clear-cut
29 to 38; inseams short (29'
Room, Street Level.
d-108 Davison
item key size
charge ( ) open new
name ___________
address___________
city_____________
Minimum cash or charge order
Columbia add 65c postage, insul
additional item. Bulk items ship
sales tax, 4 per cent S.C. Allow 1
davison's open 10:00 a.m. -- shc
1527 main street, columbia, s.c
41
at davison 's!
i famous brand
ire jeans
.99
ginally 11.00
her great sale of a really great look ! The
guys (or girls). With 4 patch pockets,
;mooth uncut cotton corduroy or robust
colors of navy, brown, wine, camel. Sizes
), medium (31"), long (33"). Gamecock
s, columbia, s.c., 29201 1-17-72
quan. color 2nd choice r
account ( ) check enclosed ( )
Sphone_________
__state ___________zip _____
$5.00 for free delivery. Outside greater
-ance, handling on first item, 10c each
ped express collect. Add 3 per cent Ga.
) day s for deliver y.
p monday and friday till 9 --
-- telephone 779-5700
Let
Gamecock resorts
to rhetoric
MS. EDITOR:
The Gamecock's new attitude
toward SCPIRG comes as a shock
to those of us who have worked for
the public interest group at USC.
Having had the editorial support
and encouragement of Editor
Farrell (See Gamecock, October
18, 1971) we wonder why The
Gamecock now sees fit to print an
editorial filled with invective and
highly irresponsible name-calling
("brainwashed petitioners"?
"pushy moneyseekers"?). Is this
the tone of reasonable, mature
disagreement?
In regard to the assertion that
SCPIRG is "involuntary," it
comes with ill grace from The
Gamecock, which, itself received
$50,000.00 this year from student
fees (See Gamecock, January 19,
1972, page 7). Do students vote to
give their money to The
Gamecock? It costs each of us
$3.00 a year from our activities fee,
but where is the petition to say
"yes, I'm in favor of it"? To quote
The Gamecock, "Why should
students have to pay $3 regardless
whether or not they want to sup
por; an organization?"
(Gamecock, January 19, 1972).
Personally, I think we need a
s, udent newspaper - even if I
sometimes disagree with it. I am
glad you have my $3.00. But why
did you take it from me in
voluntarily?
SCPIRG went - and is going - to
he students, to the people, to ask
hem to voluntarily set up a
s;udent public interest research
group. This process is called
democracy. I cannot see how a
majority vote is "involuntary
axat ion." That is merely rhetoric.
We are profoundly saddened by
University Un
& Artisi
PRES
YEVGENY YE
AT THE UNIVERS
MONDAY JA
FREE - NO TiI
ters
The Gamecock's new attitude
toward SCPIRG.
ROBERT ROSEN
Ticket chances
should be equal
MS. EDITOR:
Mr. Sloan's objection to the
inequality of ticket distribution is
legitimate but his solution as
reported in the Gamecock is no
better than the present system.
Mr. Sloan objects to the idea that
graduate students are, along with
student government people, given
better seats. He doesn't object to
the unfair system of a "pecking
order" at all, but rather would only
change the people who are
privileged in the system.
The solution is simple. Tickets
should be distributed to everyone
equally - freshmen, transfers,
seniors, and even grad students.
The procedure would be the same
as to times based on student I.D.
numbers, but there would be no
privilege group - all tickets would
be accessible to everyone no
matter what class. Everyone
would have several chances to get
good seats, an equal number of
chances for bad seats, and all
students in the University would be
treated equally. The solution is so
obvious I know it must have been
thought of before, but I think that
maybe it should be brought to the
a t tention of the student body at this
time.
JOSEPH H. LUMPKIN
Ist YEAR LAW STUDENT
Subscribe to
the Gamecock
ion Lectures
:s Series
PENTS
VTUSHEN KO
ITY COLISEUM
N 24 8:00 PM
CKETS NEEDED