The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, December 10, 1971, Page Page 3, Image 3
Coach Dietzel
the finest
MR. FARRELL:
In the recent issues of the
Gamecock there have been letters
questioning the capabilities of Paul
Dietzel, both as an administrator
and a coach. These letters have
been written from the viewpoint of
an outsider. We feel that the
opinions of the football sqdad
should be voiced.
Coach Dietzel, as an ad
ministrator, has accomplished
many things to his credit. The
George Terry building, a new
track, a new coliseum, the Roost,
and an addition to the stadium with
an astro-turfed field have been the
result of Coach Dietzel's ad
ministration. Who else could have
made such improvements in six
years?
As for Coach Dietzel's ability to
coach, ask someone on the football
squad, don't make hasty con
jectures. We feel that Coach
Dietzel has done his job well, both
to coach and to inspire. One
cannot ask for anyone who has
more dedication and love for his
work. During the season he is at
the roundhouse at 6:30 A. M. and
leaves at 11:00 at night trying to
better our team.
We feel that no one else could
have done a better job with what he
had. Many have forgotten that the
team lost some of its potency with
the injuries to Haggard, Mimms,
Kuritz, Rice, Toy, Barfield, and
Rowe. True the season wasn't a
complete success but blame the
team, not the coach. Coach Dietzel
sincerely believes in his con
victions and we sincerely believe
in coach Dietzel. The Student Body
may feel that the Gamecock
football team is coachless but we
feel that we have the finest.
JOHN LE HEUP
Coach Dietzel
not finest
MR. FARRELL:
I must agree with your
November 29 editorial entitled
"Coachless." Indeed Carolina has
gone coachless this season.
Without the spectacular play of
Dickie Harris, Carolina would
have died a faster death than we
did.
On your suggestion, I have
looked around. In looking around
I've found ONE Carolina coach
For Your
B:
Letter
and team that has come through
all season. The coach is Ralph
Wahl and the team is the Carolina
Band. The band has had the un
canny ability to be "up" for every
game. They were great all year
and at the big 'games they were
spectacular. As the football team
was trounced by FSU (one of only
two band performances I missed),
the show with the formation of a
man sitting under a palm tree stole
the half time honors. I was told the
Florida people loved it.
At Tennessee in another big
game, the football team was
soundly defeated but the band
"soundly" defeated Tennessee.
With selections of foot stomping
Hillbilly and Nashville sounds, the
band won the hearts of the Big
Orange. On the trip back from
Tennessee a friend told me "I
enjoyed Carolina making. fun of
Tennessee's music, but I didn't
enjay Tennessee making fun of our
football team."
Finally, as our team passed
away in the "second half of the
season", the Clemson game, our
band came through once again.
With "The Pink Panther Theme"
and "What's New Pussycat" and
with the beheading of a tiger, the
band won their final half-time
show. They held the tiger. This
may sound bitter, but I can't un
derstand how our football team
(which grosses about a billion
dollars a year) can be so inferior to
our band (which receives little
support at all. ) unless it's the
coaching. While the football team
ended up with a 6-5 (winning?)
season, the band came through
undefeated.
I would like to conclude by
saying, Congratulations to Coach
Wahl and the struttin' Gamecocks.
You were great.
THANK YOU
NAME WITHHELD BY REQUEST
Ticket
distribution
on the decline
MR. FARRELL:
Since my freshman year, I have
seen the student ticket distribution
for football and basketball games
steadily improve until this year.
The student government has
shown its ineptness In many areas,
but this bungling usually does not
directly affect the student body.
Unfortunately, the student
government has been given the
power to distribute student tickets
Christmas Sh
Gam...ek
Chaa-ge A....ut
RIT TON
to the
and has shown disorganization,
selfishness, a lack of common
sense, and no concern for the
welfare of the students it is sup
posed to represent.
At the first of this semester the
student senate promptly voted
itself the best seats in the stadium.
The student body had to struggle
for the remaining seats under a
changing distribution system.
Every week one could wait with
anticipation to see what new
restriction would be placed on the
students. At the same time Clint
Sloan, the chairman of the ticket
committee, was strutting behind
the ticket tables. He had good
reason to strut, for he was sitting
on the fifty-yard line.
For the first four home
basketball games, the Ticket
Office had planned to distribute the
student tickets before exams
started. Sloan, speaking for the
student government, dissuaded
this move and decided to distribute
the Marquette tickets during the
last week of Christmas Holidays
and the Manhatten and St.
Bonaventure tickets during the
orientation days- of Spring
semester, when most students will
still be on vactation. He also an
nounced this policy in the
GAMECOCK published the day
before Thanksgiving, so that a
majority of students were not
aware of the schedule. It did not
matter to him that this schedule
placed a burden on most students,
for he has to return a week early
for the first week of law school.
Now, the student government
proposes to distribute the
Marquette tickets on the first day
of exams, in spite of the fact that
most students have exams on that
day or the next one and do not have
the time to waste picking up their
tickets. However, since he is a
freshman in law school, Sloan does
not have an exam on that day. Why
should the whole student body be
inconvenienced for the sake of one
law student who should feel some
responsibility toward the
students?
In addition the tickets to the
other two games will still be
distributed during the orientation
period.
It is obvious that student
government cannot control their
power over tickets in a mature and
equitable manner. Perhaps the
Ticket Office should regain control
over the ticket distribution, for
they seem to be more responsible
opping Use
L
S
0
editorm
than "our" student government.
ROBERT FURR
Before exams
PLEASE
MR. FARRELL:
We the undersigned, from Bates
House Dormitory, are in
disagreement with the Univer
sity's holiday ticket distribution
policy, and suggest that these
basketball tickets be distributed
before final exams begin!!!
95 NAMES FOLLOWED
Why not
recycle exams
MR. FARRELL:
Since I have been working here
at the University, I have quickly
seen just how much paper is
wasted in just one department.
Every student generally gets at
least 2, usually 3 multiple-choice
quizzes a semester in each course
taken in this department, of
around 12 pages each, plus a
possible 15-20 page final. Most
classes in this department have
from 50-150 students in it. Every
piece of "quiz paper" is stored
until it is taken to be burned,
which occurs about once a year
(air pollution and a fire hazard).
Multiply this department by every
other department and that's a
right good bit of paper wasted.
I have been told that quizzes
cannot be recycled because of
"security reasons." There seems
to me to be a way of recycling this
"confidential" paper and main
taining security. Either the people
who take the paper to be burned, or
professors, could take the paper to
whereever it is to be recycled, not
to any distribution point for the
whole town on "Recycling Day",
but to wherever they do the
recycling. That way students won't
get hold of tests, and the paper will
not be wasted. Also, at the end of
each semester, there could be a
place where students could drop
off notebooks they used the
previous semester and will not use
again; and when new phone books
are issued, the old ones could be
collected and recycled, as well as
calendars and even boxes. There
are a right good many cardboard
boxes on this campus, too, that
could be reused - just pick up the
old ones when new ones are
brought in, and take them some
place to be recycled.
The problem seems simple
enough to me, but I feel there
might be a hassle about it, as long
as there are people here, like the
'one who is preventing me from
signing my name, who are so
wrapped up in "security" and not
letting anyone who hasn't been
Remember T7k
Home With
From 1
South Carolin
CORNER Garc
"screened", even work-study
students, get near quizzes, for fear
of questions and answers getting
out, and also those who talk all for
recycling, yet won't bother to do
any work (getting out and getting
the paper and taking it someplace)
to help recycle things.
I would sign my name, but I am
honestly afraid that a certain one
of our professors would raise such
a hassle about my radical and
impractical idea that I would have
to quit.
NAME WITHHELDBY REQUEST
Smash SCPIRG;
don't sign
MR. FARRELL:
Are we to be duped again? Can
we allow "SCPIRG" ( a better
name would be "SPLURGE" on
our money) to be given the chance
to build a political machine
composed of a group of
professional men and a "token
number" of students? (They still
haven't explained HOW or WHEN
those who didn't wish to support
"SCPIRG" would be given back
their money).
I say no! Let it be known that
one of the purposes of "SCPIRG"
is to influence legislation, that is,
to act as a lobbying agency in the
state government apparatus. This
is political, and I feel that it is
wrong to finance such a political
.agency with student funds.
If "SCPIRG" wishes to fill its
hidden coffers, let it solicit its own
funds. Let the 100 volunteers
canvass the streets, or if they don't
succeed in this, let them set up a
kettle in the Russell House Lobby -
like the Salvation Army does.
At present, if we wish to support
a political group we choose to
support. Help retain "freedom of
choice" for the majority - "'Smash
SCPIRG-Don't sign "
BRUCE G. DEW
Van Home
(Continued from Page 2)
mies, fired with bows and arrows
and revolvers at paintings until
they hung in ribbons, used
Limoges enamels of the 16th
century as oven dishes, used and
then smashed the old eMna and
glass, pocketed the Greek, Roman
and Byzantine coins, and left
everywhere.. .those heaps of ex
crement which are the charac
teristic German gift to houses in
every country they invade."
If visitors passing through the
Kennedy Center can leave the
great halls in a state of filth and
near ruin, can you imagine what
they would do if permitted to
remain overnight, unguarded?
te Folks At
A Gift
JSC
a Book Store
N & MAIN