The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, October 27, 1971, Page Page 2, Image 2
JIM FARRELL
EDITOR
LUCRETIA JONES DAVE LUNDGREN
MANAGING ED AD. MNGR.
EDITORIALS
U.N. blunder
The United Nations has made a gross blunder with the
expulsion of Nationalist China and the acceptance of the
Republic of China into its body.
The U. N. has gained a total of some 700 million people
and have lost some 14 million, which doesn't seem to be
bothering any of the voting members that voted against
the Nationalist Chinese.
A two China policy in the U. N. is a very important issue,
because the position of the security council becomes a
major question. To vote out a member in good standing is
pure ignorance. Why shouldn't 14 million people who have
shown, w-hether under a dictatorship of not, to be a
peaceful nation be represented on a world peace com
mittee along with one of the most powerful of the com
munist nations in the world?
Is the entire U. N. body going blind to the realities of the
world situation? The admission of Red China to the U. N.
was a good move because a country the size of Red China
with the potential power of that country should be involved
In the many problems facing the world today. At least
questions can now be brought up with all the major powers
in on the discussion. But to give up a peaceful nation
doesn't make much sense and raises questions of the U.
N.'s validity as to what goals it is trying to achieve.
Vote
Today !
qAs gAs)eN BY rhEr 7mffA7 oi%pV
Insight: Stephen
'Friends'
(Editor's note: This is the last in a
series of three columns by Dr.
Stephen Coy of the Theater Dept.)
All right. Whither Theatre? Now
that I've cleared my throat I'll get
to the question. The commercial
theatre is largely in the hands of
cretins who produce junk because
there are so many cretins willing
to pay for it. The avant-garde is in
the hands of people whose idea of a
Grand Opening is their navel. The
one thing these two hugely
separate groups have in common
is disregard for quality in the
written word. When these groups
agree that the theatre doesn't need
writers, what it then doesn't need
is enemies; its friends can kill it.
Well, maybe not. Because the
Harriet Van Horr
'An old
BY HAIRRIET VAN HORNE
It's better to trust the world and
be deceived than to doubt one
man's word.
And it's better to smile through
life, believing and accepting, than
to sulk about with a mean,
suspicious mind.
Two noble precepts, those, now
outdated by the fear and cynicism
of our time. It hurts to see trust
vanish from our society. For with
it goes a gentleness, a faith that
sweetened the very air and raised
us all a little above ourselves. This
loss of trust goes far in explaining
the oft-heard remark, "We used to
be NICER people." We were, we
were. Because the world was
nicer.
To have watched the erosion of
trust, over the past 20 years, is to
have witnessed a dramatic change
in the face cf America. Our
civilization is not yet what Ezra
Pound once said it was -"An old
bitch gone bad in the teeth"-but
the candor, the openness, have
vanished.
One feels sadness for the rising
generation that cannot imagine a
time when front doors were left off
the latch all night. When bicycles.
were parked casually under the'
Irees. When we walked home in the
late night feeling calm and easy,
eyes eyes on the stars.
Perhaps the most troubling
element in the climate of fear Is the
Our Times
Presi4
BY SMITH H EMPSTONE
.Columnist
In nominating Lewis Franklin
Powell Jr. and William Hubbs
Rtehnquist to the Supreme Court,
President Nixon set aside a notion
which appealed to him both per
sonally and politically: Ap
point ment of the first woman to the
high court.
The President's obsession with
"firsts" is well known. And the
appointment of a woman might
have neutralized much of the
mounting criticism that his ad
ministration is anti-feminist.
To give the President his due,
two of the six persons he referred
to the American Bar Association's
committee on the federal
judiciary--Judge Mildred L. Lille
of California and Judge Sylvia
Bacon of the District of Columbia
were women. Neither was found
smnlif id hy the ABiA for servfce
Coy
can kill ti
"whole world of theatre" that I
mentioned before, the very same
"rest of us" who are neither ar
iistically far out nor financially in
deep, don't agree. We live in a
theatrical world where realism
and belief are very far from dead
(The English critic Virginia Woolf
announced the death of realism
early in this century after reading
Joyce's Ulysses. A half-century
later Edward Albee wrote a long,
very alive and quite realistic play,
one of the best we have, and
t humbed his nose at Mrs. Woolf in
thLtitle.), and where we have not
yet learned to stop cherishing the
writers of good language, realistic
and otherwise. For once, being
behind the times is a benefit; and it
ie
bitch gon
growing suspicion we have of our
own government. This ought not to
be.
When ordinary men assume
great powers and use them in
secret, we are right to fear. When
peaceful citizens are spied upon by
paid informers, when telephones
are tapped and meeting rooms
bugged, we are living in a police
state. The most basic right in a
democratic society-the right to be
let alone-is violated all over
America every single day. We are
right to be fearful. And considering
the kind of country we are
becoming, we are also right to be
angry and ashamed.
One of my bedside companions is
Montaigne. And one sleepless night
last week I came upon this:
"The corruption of our age is
made up of the individual con
tributions of each of us. Those who
are influential enough to do so
contribute injustice, cruelty,
avarice and tyranny. The weaker
sort ... contribute folly, futilities
and idleness."
Like most of us today, Montaigne
wishes that the men in the seats of
power were wiser and finer than
they are. "They are much beneath
us if they are not far above us," he
writes. "Having promised more,
they must do more."
And having power, they should
exercise it with perfect candor and
a delicate hand.
lent loses
on the Supreme Court.
In a statistical sense, it always
was highly unlikely that the
President could find a politically
acceptable woman with legal
credentials of the same quality as
those of potential male candidates.
Of the 324,318 practicing lawyers in
the United States, only 9,103- 2.8
percent of the total-are women. Of
the nation's 5,000 federal, state and
local judges, only about 150 are
women.
But if he failed to come up with a
woman, the Predident did succeed
in another of his frequently stated
(and perhaps more sincerely held)
goals: the- nomination, in the
person of Powell, of a qualified
Southerner to the Supreme Court.
The 64-year-old Virginian,who
has practiced law in Richmond
since 1931, has the intellectual
q44lities one has a right to expect
-'.* ira'miem Cot.nnmrineeA1k.
ie theatre
is because of this that, strident
voices to the contrary, writing for
i he iheat re is not only not dying but
is in one of its great eras. With- the
works of Ionesco and Brecht still so
much done that we don't think of
them as revivals with Weiss and
Pinter and Beckett and Stoppard
and Albee and Williams and
Osborne still writing, there is
reason for cheer. And there are
some new names worth cheering,
too. To name a haphazard but
firstrate few: John Guare, Israel
Horovitz, Oliver Hailey, Adrienne
Kennedy, Rochelle Owens, Jean
Claude van Itallie, Lanford Wilson,
Paul Zindel, Sam Shepard,
Douglas Turner Ward, Herb
Gardner and Ed Bullins. Watch for
them.
te bad'
If one were to single out the
agencies that have done most to
sow fear, suspicion and distrust
among our citizens these would
come first: the FBI, the Justice
Department as directed by Atty.
Gen. John Mitchell and the CIA.
One might also mention the U. S.
Army and the paranoid
propaganda mill of the far right,
with its hundreds of hours on
regional radio and TV each week,
hawking hatred, misinforming the
simple and setting citizen against
citizen.
Lack of trust in our leadership
has led to another significant
change in the American attitude.
That is, an open disrespect for the
men in power. This trend was first
apparent in the Johnson Ad
ministration. A great many
Americans had viewed President
Roosevelt with a blind hate but the
hate was private, an un
derstanding among friends, so to
speak. There was no dramatic
equivalent of "MacBird", with the
President portrayed as a mur
derer. There was no film
documentary on the order of
"Millhouse" which is totally
contemptuous of Mr. Nixon.
When Phillip Roth , in his new
novel "Our Gang," writes about
Trick E. Dixon and J. Edgar Hee
Haw, we may find the humor
juvenile but we are no longer
;hocked.
'first'
Beta Kappa, he was first in his law
school class at Washington and Lee
Univer ity, holds a mastcr's degree
from Harvard and is a former
president (1964-65) of the ABA.
Rehnquist, who was born In
Wisconsin but has spent most of his
life (he Is 47) in Arizona, also is
highly qualified In an Intellectual
sense. Like Powell, he is a Phi Beta
Kappa and was first In his law
class at Stanford before going on to
clerk for Supreme Court Justice
Robert H. Jackson in 1952.
Like Powell, Rehnquist has a
moderate record on civil rights
and a tough reputation on law and
order. Given his age, Intellectual
qualities and capacity to grow In
wisdom and understanding,
Rehnquist, who is a Republican
(Powell is a Democrat), has the
potential to become a great judge.