The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, October 18, 1971, Page Page 2, Image 2
JIM FARRELL
EDITOR
LUCRETIA JONES DAVE LUNDGREN
MANAGING ED AD. MNGR.
EDITORIALS
Within system
Ralph Nader has done this country a great service with
his muckraking studies into the practices of our industries.
He has made it possible to buy many goods without
guessing as to their value and safety. Nader's Raiders
have also given us information pertaining to those goods
which do- not meet standards and that we as consumers
might not have noticed.
Many states throughout the Union have public research
groups that have followed the Nader methods and have
achieved their goals of consumer protection and en
vironmental control and continue to do so.
The State of South Carolina could use a group of this sort
and do well by it.
There is a group of interested students throughout the
state that are attempting the birth of a group typical of
Nader, the South Carolina Public interest Research Group
(SCPIRG).
There would be a taxation of the student body that would
help fund this non-profit corporation and would enable this
group to hire many educated men and women in
various fields of study.
The group prospectus states, "SCPIRG Is an effort by
South Carolina students to work within the existing
educational and social system to analyze and help South
Carolina's pressing problems in such areas as en
vironmental preservation and consumer protection." This
statement does not espouse any political connections
because there are none.
For this group to exist it will take every student to
support the existing proposal. The group is not a political
ballgame. It will be a workable plan with the needed
support.
Harriet Van .Hon
BabblinA
BY HARRIET VAN HORNE
Columnist
Let us not underestimate the
value of Martha Mitchell. She's the
best barometer we have to warn us
of the political storms ahead. What
the wife of the attorney general
babbles in public today invariably
turns out to be high-level policy
tomorrow. And the more she
babbles, the more valuable she is
to us all.
Conservatives need a Martha
Mitchell in their lives because her
salty, down-home invectives case
their frustrations. The prejudices
she expresses in public echo
perfectly what they are saying
everyday in private.
Liberals need Mrs. Mitchell even
more than her own constituency
needs her. She's a natural target
for their pent-up rage against the
Administration. And with her
unrestrained bad taste. her rather
girlish ignorance of how govern
ment functions, the wife of the
attorney general epitomizes what
intellectuals call "the Nixon
spirit." Mediocrity, slyness,
ineptitude and an unprecedented
insolence in office.
Still, we listen carefully each
time Mrs. Mitchell favors us with
another philosophical observation,
another veiled threat, another hint
that John and Dick are heating up
a caldron for their foes.
Naturally Mrs. Mitchell shared
her husband's outrage over the
Pentagon Papers. If the Johnson
war secrets can become public,
who's to stop the Nixon war
secrets?The attorney general will
do his blundering best. Meantime,
Martha warned, the press is
Our Times
Judges h
BY SMITH HEMPSTONE
Columnist
The extent to which all
Americans are indebted to U.S.
Appeals Court Judges David L.
Bazelon, Harold Leventhal and
Spottswood W. Robinson III will
become apparent on Oct. 26. That
is the date upon which the Mayday
Tribe, whose members so
distinguished themselves here last
spring, have vowed to "surround
and close the White House."
For those of you who may have
missed it, the three judges ruled
earlier this month that the
Washington police must return the
collateral (estimated at $30,000)
forfeited by perhaps 3,000
protesters arrested on May 3 when
the Mayday horde tried to close
down the capital of the nation
which nurtured them.
The judges further barred the
government from distributing the
arrest records of tribesmen other
than those convicted of offenses,
temporarily enjoined the govern
ment from proceeding In the
prosecution of the estimated 325
Mayday cases still pending and
ordered government officials to
retrieve any copies of Mayday
arrest records which may have
been disseminated outside the
Washington police department.
Dandy. Never rmind -thet the
tribesmen interfered with the
Martha
getting too indiscreet for its own
good.
In fact, in Martha's words, this
poor judgment on the part of the
newspapers "has reached such an
extent that it may result in com
plete suppression of the press, in
which event it will have caused its
own death."
It's impossible to read this
casually dropped remark without
feeling some cold shudders. First,
a shudder of distaste for the
gloating, smirking ill will of this
Cabinet wife. Second, the ominous
shudder one feels at the touch of
icy fingers on the back of the neck.
"Someone just walked over all our
graves," I remember thinking,
"and it's Martha Mitchell."
No Administration in recent
history has been as suspicious of or
hostile to the press as this one, No
other Administration has ever
invoked the doctrine of prior
restraint, filed criminal actions
against newspapers, intimidated
TV networks and attempted to
manage the news for the greater
glory of its own schemes and
stratagems.
A recent New Yorker quoted "a
senior member of the Republican
National Committee" as having
said privately that the Ad
ministration was plotting a high
level campaign to destroy the
credibility of the press before the
'72 elections.
The purpose, the New Yorker
goes on to quote its Republican
informant, would be to enable the
President to say at election time
that "since the press had proved
untrustworthy, its attacks on him
and his record were worthless."
elp May(
rights of ordinary citizens who
wanted only to get to work and did
not happen to concur in the belief
of David Dellinger and Rennie
Davis that Richard Nixon is the
reincarnation of Adolf Hitler.
Never mind that their freak-out
cost the District of Columbia
$3,271,560, and merchants and
private individuals untold
thousands of dollars in lost
business and property damage.
Apparently the demonstrators,
swept up in a dragnet when,
because of the size of the mob, the
police were unable to apply routine
arrest procedures, suffered
grievous damage to their Sixth
Amendment right "to be informed
of the nature and cause of the acu
ccusation" against them. Not to
speak of the terrible blow to their
psyches occasioned by being
hustled off to places of detention
which did not resemble the Ritz.
Horrors! By all means return
their $10 collateral to these
paragons of virtue. Let them not
be discommoded in any way.
Encourage them to come back
again and again. And it will not be
just Washington which is indebted
to Messrs. Bazelon, Leventhal and
Robinson; the Mayday bravoes
and their allies, the white radicals
of what is a laughingly known as
the People:Oalition, for'- Peace
and J''teidhfaoniPne
Mitchell
That the plot against the press
was doomed from the start seems
not to have occurred to the Ad
ministration. Two major rounds
have been lost with maximum
publicity: the decision on the
Pentagon Papers and the tabling of
the contempt citation against CBS
President Frank Stanton. And
there will be more.
The New Yorker piece states
that the antipress campaign will be
"organized and directed by Herb
Klein." To most of the working
press, this is a pretty fair
guarantee that the way will not
be smooth.
Instead of intimidating the
press, Mr. Klein could better serve
the President by instructing
certain high-ranking members of
the government in the basics of
public relations. If they wish to
avoid looking foolish or sinister in
the press, then they should learn to
speak and act with discretion.
When we look back on the Nixon
years-hopefully from the serenity
of a more honorable government
we are bound to ask in horror, "Did
we really have men like that in the
seats of the mighty?"
We have an attorney general
who, if we may accept the so far
reliable chatter of his wife, isn't
going to be surprised if the
newspapers of the land lose their
freedom. And , indeed, why should
he be surprised? Isn't that what
the boys in the backroom-or thQ
Oval Office-have been talking
about all these months?
Copyright 1971
Los Angeles Times
lay Tribe
Action Coalition, plan to hold other
demonstrations in most major
cities of the country on Nov. 6.
It is interesting to note that the
demonstrators, while they are
perfectly willing to use the Con
stitution as a shield to hide behind,
do not have the same fine respect
for the law as Appeals Court
judges. Indeed, Dellinger has
stated publicly that the Oct. 26
"Evict Nixon" rally will take place
even if its organizers are refused a
permit.
In no country in the world--and
certainly not in the Communist
countries which so many of the
protesters profess to admire
would behavior of the sort which
took place here on May 3 and which
promises to occur here on Oct. 26
be tolerated.
For the rule of law and the
niceties of constitutional rights can
be thoroughly and honorably ob
served only when the social con
tract is adhered to by both sides in
a dispute. Legality and justice are
not the same thing and the first can
undermine the course of the second
when individuals knowingly use
the law to subvert the ends of
justice. A man has a right to
clench his fist ; but that right stops
well short of another man,'s nose
in any ordered and sensible
society.