The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, October 01, 1971, Page Page 2, Image 2
JIM. FARRELL
EDITOR
LUCRETIA JONES DAVE LUNDGREN
MANAGING ED AD. MNGR.
EDITORIALS
ROTC yes;
West Point no
There has been a movement throughout the country to
remove the ROTC program from the different campuses.
This movement has now become a part of the Carolina
campus. There are a few facts that should be faced. The
need for an army in this country is a reality because
regardless of who controls the country, protection for the
people is needed.
There are many different ways to build an army and
one of them is to have a strong officers' corps. One of the
means to achieve this corps is to have military institutions.
Military institutions, such as West Point, throughout the
country are geared for the sole purpose of training men in
the art of strategy and dicipline. Many of the people
coming out of these institutions are living a life of the
military by the time their first year is up and their concept
of life is '"spit and shine." They are pushed to the point of
believing everything that is told to them. They live in the
military atmosphere for four years straight. They become
indoctrinated with the military rhetoric to the point of
forgetting that most of America is made up of civilians.
The all-military institute should be abolished. However, on
the other hand, the men in the Reserve Officers Training
Corps can relate to other students and, since the army
reflects the Civilian problem, be able to help change the
military.
Many of these people are looking for a way to go through
college and when they qualify for the program they get
incentives from the military. They have more sense in
many cases because of their constant contact with the rest
of the population than would a completely militarily in
doctrinated officer.
Isn't it better that we allow this type of military
teaching to continue than striving to force those interested
in this type of education and life into the military in
stitutions? The military is here to stay. Face the facts and
look at the alternatives.
MUMSY.4**O* . .BU.aW/ H a~
Insight: Bill Hen
Black
-Editor's note-This Is the first
in a series of two columns written
by Bill Henderson of the Afro
American Studies Dept.
The appearance of the
Honorable Edmond Muskie in our
state last week brought to mind the
controversy over Black par
ticipation in the November 1972
election. Sen. Muskie is an out
standing candidate for the
Democratic nomination. He had
been at the forefront of a number
of progressive measures and Sen.
Muskie's party, as well as the
nation, could certainly benefit
from much of the progressive
leadership he has offered.
I think on the other hand,
however, that Senator Muskie has
missed the mark as "ruling out the
possibility of a Black vice
presidential running mate." There
is currently a belief being talked
about throughout the nation by
responsible persons, that a Black
presidential candidate would be
the more qualified to lead the
nation than any other person on the
scene. I agree with this.
It seems to me that the nation is
in need of a real father who can
Our times
Politics
BY SMITH HEMPSTONE
Columnist
The resignations within a single
week of Associate Justices Hugo L.
Black and John Marshall Harlan
for the first time since 1941 afford
an American president the op
portunity to fill a double vacancy
on the Supreme Court. And let one
thing, to coin a phrase, be made
perfectly clear: With a
presidential election just 13
months ahead, short-term political
considerations will have much to
do with whom Mr. Nixon names to
the court.
The principal groups with which
Mr. Nixon needs (or would like) to
ingratiate himself before the
balloting can easily be identified:
Blacks, women, Jews and
Southerners.
The President realizes, however,
that he has little chance to make
much of an inroad into the Negro
vote whatever he does. And, in any
case, blacks have a representative
on the court in the person of
Associate Justice Thurgood
Marshall. Marshall is reported to
be in poor health and, were he to
retire or die, the chances are that
Mr. Nixon would appoint another
black to succeed him. But that is a
question for the future and it is
extremely unlikely that the
President will appoint another
Negro to the court at this time.
On several occassions since the
Senate's refusal to confirm either
Judge Clement F. Hayneswor-th of
South Carolina (in 1969) or Judge
G. Harrold Carswell of Florida (in
1970), Mr. Nixon has publicly
stated his intention of appointing a
Southerner to the Supreme Court.
'Tis is doubly imperative in a
political sense now that the
retirement of Black, an Alabaman,
has left the court denuded of
Southerners.
As recently as last Thursday
morning, before the resignation of
derson
president
bring us all together, someone who
has a boy in Vietnam , someone
who is young; someone who is free
of color prejudice, someone who
...the nation is in need
of a real father who
can bring us all
together,someone who
has a boy in Vietnam,
someone who is young,
someone who is free of
color prejudice, some
one who can relate to
all people. A Black
president fits this bill.
,can relate to all people. A Black
President fits this bill.
One needs only look at the
Vietnam War. It was leadership
of double
peared highly probable that Mr.
Nixon would try once again to
place a Southerner on the court.
Now that two vacancies are
available, that probability has
become a virtual certainty.
A number of Southern names
have been floated, the most
prominent of which has been that
of 10-term Republican
Representative Richard Harding
Poff of Roanoke, Va. Others
mentioned have been former
Florida Republican Congressman
William C. Cramer, U.S. District
Court Judge George C. Young of
Orlando, Fla., former American
Bar Association presidents Lewis
F..Powell Jr. of Richmond, Va.,
adid Charles S. Rhyne of
Washington, D.C. (the latter is a
close personal friend of Mr.
Nixon), District Judge Walter E.
Hoffman of Norfolk, Va., and
mirabile dictu, Vice President
Spiro T. Agnew of Maryland.
'Ihe Poff candidacy has been the
strongest pressed. He is young (48),
has a good legal mind and (like
Black, named from the Senate by
FDR) would be coming directly
from political life. But Poff in his
20 years in Congress has had
ample opportunity to make
political foes as well as friends, is
opposed by segments of the civil
rights lobby (despite the support of
the ranking members of the House
Judiciary Committee, Emanuel
Celler and William M. McCulloch,
both strong civil rights advocates)
and has no experience on the
bench, a factor to which Mr. Nixon
has said he attributes much im
portance.
If Poff is bypassed for "the
Southern seat," Nixon might well
turn to someone like U.S. District
Judge Frank M. Johnson, 52, of
Montgomery, Ala., a liberal
Republican who worked hard for
both the Eisenhower and Nixon
.candidacies, or to Charles A.
needed
like Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King
which took the initiative to speak
out against the war at a time when
few persons dared to say anything.
It was only later the men of good
will began to see that the Vietnam
was leading us to an all out atomic
war. From another angle also,
Blacks serve and die at a higher
rate than any other racial group in
that war. We are 25 per cent of the
total armed forces in Vietnam and
40 per cent of the front line. We
therefore are in a position also to
want peace. Our mothers cry, we
fit in pine boxes. We're tired of war
and killing. Why then can't we
become President? So the father of
the nation must know war in a
special way. Then secondly the
father of the nation must be able to
speak to the needs of the young.
The Black Community is a young
community. Is it not . then a
representative able to articulate
the aspirations and longings of
youths,. Fifty percent of the Black
population is under 21; while the
national average is 31 years old.
Are we not therefore the youth and
vitality in the country?
vacancy
law professor who is a con
servative Republican with im
peccable intellectual credentials.
The "Jewish seat" on the court
has been vacant since the
resignation, under a cloud, of
Associate Justice Abe Fortas
more, than two years ago, the
present occupant being Harry A.
Blackmun of Minnesota.
The importance of the Jewish
vote can be overestimated, since it
is heavily concentrated in one
state, New York. But Mr. Nixon
needs to win New York in 1972 and
-perhaps more importantly--to
reduce Jewish campaign con
tributions to his Democratic op
ponent. Had only one seat on the
court been available, it almost
certainly would have gone to a
Southerner rather than a Jew; now
that two seats are at Mr. Nixon's
disposal, the possibility of a Jewish
nominee cannot be ruled out.
The availability of that second
seat also adds credence to the
possibility that Mr. Nixon, with his
known penchant for "firsts,"
might name a woman. Several
women reportedly were on the
basic list of about ibU jurists under
consideration. But when only one
seat was available, it seemed
highly unlikely that the President
would pay more than lip-service to
the feminist movement.
The loss within a single week of
the two towering figures on the
Supreme Court probably
foreshadows a period of un
certainty before philosophical
trends begin to develop. But that
trend almost certainly will be to
the right.
Mr. Nixon has the responsibility
to name jursists who will be an
adornment to the court. But to
deny the pressures of partisanship
is to deny that there will be a
presidential election in 13 months.