The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, September 24, 1971, Page Page 2, Image 2
JIM 1
Ell
LUCRETIA JONES
MANAGING ED
EDIT(
Reflee
of'Na2
President Thieu of South i
Wednesday in order to acqu
from the people of his coun
To vote is to make a choice,
be more than one faction. Pre
secret directives to all prov
make sure he has the vote of
done.
Yet, the United States g(
rights of Vietnam to a democi
to be affiliated with a country
dictatorship? Does it want t(
another Russia?
Is this senseless war being
someone made a mistake?
The draft call is now being
Are the young men in this c
war for the development of a
taught to oppose since we we
schoolers?
The upcoming election in S
that the final blow has come a
The draft call will be re:
Nixon signs the Senate-appr
expected in rejuvenating the
Are the young nen In this c
war for the protection of a
To paraphrase Senator I
known supporter of the %
reminds us of Hitler's Ger
,contemporary Russia. Is th
The South Vietnam electior
blow has come. Let us qet c
Our times
Th roe
(aors nose: "Aur times" will
be a regular column.)
BY SMITH HEMPS'TONE
Columnist
Monday's orgy of throat-slitting
and gunfire at New York's Attica
State Prison is yet another har
binger of the crisis facing the
American penal systemn and, by
inference, society as a whole.
Black militants, with their
penchant for warmed-over
Marxist -explanations, will insist
that the rebellious prisoners, like
Spartacus and his band, were
driven to their desperate acts by
the relentless hatred of society
which, according to one of their
complaints, was providing them
with too much perk and too little
fresh fnudt.
At the other end of the political
spectrum, there wili be demands
for stricter controls over prison
inmates and retention of capital
punishment.
Hayever one views the Attica,
maacere, the fact is that the
nation'svarious penal svstems are
in a state aqngmuIellse to
.knsurretlast g October there
PARRELL
ITOR
DAVE LUNDGREN
AD. MNGR.
)RIALS
tions
!asm
'ietnam started his campaign
Ire the "vote of confidence"
try.
To make a choice there must
sident Thieu has also sent out
Ince chiefs ordering them to
confidence no matter how its
)vernment is protecting the
racy. Does this countfry want
following in the footseteps of
be connected with creating
fought to save face because
resumed thanks to Congress.
Duntry to continue to fight a
government we have all been
re just young innocent grade
Duth Vietnam is proof enough
nd now,we should get out.
5umed as soon as President
oved bill. Quick approval is
old law which ended in June.
ountry to continue to fight a
dictatorship?
-lenry Jackson, D-Wash., a
rar, the upcoming election
many and parallels that of
Is what we are supporting?
Is proof enough that the final
>ut.
it-slitting a
was a series of violent outbreaks in
New -York City prisons. These
were followed by serious disor
ders at four California Institutions,
Folson, San Quentin, Soledad and
San Luis Obispo, and, more
recently, by the George Jackson
shoot-out at San Quentin.
Nor does It require an expert
knowledge of penology to perceive
that our correctional institutions
are not correcting. A casual
acquairrtanceship with natonal
crime statistics, with their dire
tale of recidivism, Indicates that
on the contrary-our penal systems
are schools which succeed only In
producing more accomplished and
vicious criminals.
As presently constituted, the one
thing that can be said in favor of
the present system is that It keeps
a certain number of criminals out
of circulation for a certain amount
of time. But not enough are caught
and they are not put away for long
enough to make the system serve
the basic need of law-abiding
citizens for the security of their
persns and prerty.
Insight: Rex Car
'Time h
(Editor's note: This column
initiates a regular series of
editorial columns written by dif
ferent persons involved in the
news. Each of these columns was
written exclusively for the
-Gamecock. This column was
written by Rex Carter, a Democrat
from Greenville and speaker pro
tem. Carter Is the leading can
didate against Solomon Blatt for
the Speaker's- seat in the S.C.
House of Representatives.)
On Tuesday, February 23, 1971,
the South Carolina House of
Representatives went into session
at 10:00 a.m. Just like every other
Tuesday when the General
Assembly is in session, we had a
number of Bills on the agenda that
would be acted upon that day.
Legislators were standing in
corners, by desks and in the lob
bies, talking back and forth about
Bills to be considered, about the
weekend just passed and about
things personal and legal.
Speaker Solomon
Blatt was theonly
member of the
House to cast his
lot against the
18-year-old-vote...
In the Galleries were
representatives from various
student organizations, along with
lobbyists representing the various
views of the special interests.
The House looked and acted like
it does on any given day. We
proceeded through the Calendar in
normal fashion. The Speaker
rolled over Bills and Resolutions as
the members ayed and nayed theiri
own particular approval. Towards
the end of the Calendar was H.
1364; a joint resolution from the
Judiciary Committee proposing an
Amendment to the State Con
stitution that would change the
minimum age of electors in South
tt Attica
entirely demented, who maintain
that society would be better off if
all prisons were abolished. In that
case, there would be a
proliferation of minor criminals
but at least they would be denied
exposure to the post-graduate
courses in violence and depravity
taught by hard-core inmates of our
penal institutions. A novel idea,
but hardly one likely to be im
plemented.
In the once and future world of
behavioral psychologist B. F.
Skinner, where people (he says)
will "live together without
quarreling" and it will seldom be
necessary to punish anyone
because "behavior likely to be
punished seldom or never occurs,"
it is possible that anti-social
behavior will be "conditioned out"
of potential or convicted criminals
through the administratjon of
drugs. But if that Orwellian day is
just around the corner, it will still
be too late for the current crisis,
which is here and now.
Huey P. Newton, who as
Minister of Defense of the Black
Panther. Party knoOvs .bmethin.
wer
Es come tA
Carolina to 18. When the proposal
was read aloud by the Clerk, a
gong was sounded notifying the
membership that a roll call vote
would be taken on this issue. The
giant tally boards lit up, and green
lights flickered next to the
members' names signifying ap
proval. On the top left hand corner,
one red light switched on; all other
rows filled with green lights. Uke a
finger in the dike of history, one
man in the House held out against
progress.
Speaker Soloman Blatt was the
only member of the House to cast
his lot against the 18-year-old vote
that day. To be truthful, his vote on
the issue didn't make any dif
ference; the Nation had already
decided to grant the 18,19 and 20
year-olds the vote. Nevertheless, I
remember that roll call vividly,
because the man I would come to
run aginst for Speaker had stood
before us a symbol of the will to
resist.
. In the months that have passed
since that vote was taken, many
things have changed in the House.
There is a new feeling among
many of the members that the dike
is about to break; that South
Carolina is about to come face to
face with the choice of standing
still or moving forward. In truth,
this feeling has been growing ever
since the end of the war. During
the fifties and sixties, we began to
realize that South Carolina
possessed an enormous potential
for growth. Particularly during the
last 10 years, we have applied our
energy and our will to improving
the lives of all South Carolinians.
Our per capita income has
doubled; our job opportunities
have multiplied; improvements
can be attributed directly to the
energy of the people of South
Carolina. So often during these
years of change and progress, that
leadership in the House has been a
barrier to, rather than a channel
for, progress. On the issues of
kindergartens, compulsory
education, tax reform and so many
other important issues, the
leadership has stood intransigent
to the winds of change.
State Pris
about the subject, mraintains that
there are two types of prisoners
within our prison systems. The
first and more numerous type, he
says, "accept the legitimacy of the
assumptions upon which the
society is based." This type of
prisoner he' describes as an
"illegitimate capitalist."
Newton's second type rejects the
legitimacy of society's assump
tions and, whether at large or in
prison, does not seek
rehabilitation, will not cooperate
and is "a political prisoner."
There is a great deal of validity
in that and it would seem that a
first step in calming down the
prisons would be to separate the
"illegitimate capitalists," the
garden-variety criminals, from
the "political prisoners," men who
have committed criminal acts
which they (if no one else) regard
as politically motivated.
If this is not done, it is clear that
the "illegitimate capitalists" will
rapidly become contaminated by
the "political prisoners," since it is
no more than buman nature for
'unen ato-blame -thefr 'pesondl.
decide'
I recognize that not all change is
good. Very often our afterthoughts
give us better direction than our
impulse. But, generally speaking,
the urge to improve the lives of
citizens economically and
culturally is the most healthy ofall
our collective desires.
Oliver Wendell Holmes once
said, "I find the great thing in this
world is not so much where we
stand, as in what direction we are
moving." Therein lies the real
Oliver Wendell
Holmes once said,
"I find the great
thing in this
world is not so
much where we
stand, as in what
direction we are
0
conflict in the battle for Speaker
between Mr. Blatt and myself. Our
fight is not one that springs from
the frictions of old vs. young, or big
county vs. small county, or even
progressive vs. conservative. The
contest for Speaker is one of
direction.
When Mr. Blatt says, "I'm proud
of South Carolina", he means that
he's proud of where we stand;
when I say, "I'm proud of South
Carolina", I'm talking about the
prosperity our people could share,
about the future we could look
forward to living in. The leader
ship cannot stop progress, nor can
it start the wheels of orderly
progression, but it can provide
direction. After twenty years of
sometimes begrudging progress,
the time has come for us to decide
whether we accept the challenges
of the future and begin to plan for
them or if we lull ourselves into
another two years of alliance with
the past.
failures and weaknesses on ex
ternal forces.
For the "political prisoners,"
the prospect is for long terms of
imprisonment, for they cannot
expect pardon or parole from a
iety to the desrtriuci~n of which
they remain dedicated. The one
alternative might be tran
sportation, after serving the
maximum sentence, to another
country which would agree to
accept them. Certainly Cuba or
Algeria would be welcome to them.
Finally, it is clear that our prison
systems should be so altered that
all first-offenders of both
categories should be sent to
prisons from which multiple
offenders are excluded. And there
should be a separation even among
first-offenders between those
'convicted of violent and non
violent crimes. Only thus can there
be a reasonable chance for
rehabilitating the less hardened
types.
Otherwise w maym face -n,