The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, May 17, 1971, Page Page 3, Image 3
Letters to the edit
Porth'E
DF'AR MR. BEEBE:
In Wednesday's Gamecock, Mr.
W. C. Henderson gave his views on
Senator Lucius Porth's proposal of
"voluntary sterilization" for
welfare families. There are many
pros and cons to -this proposal;
however, Mr. Henderson seems to
have given an extremely one-sided
criticism.
''hrotghout his letter, Mr.
Henderson refers to -the "decent
FRANKLYSPMAKIN
lie CAN SIF
IS He OR SA
r /r
GO ALL THE WA)
"It's the smart way.
ANHEUSER-SUSCH INC ST. inOUIC
or
prope
white community" and the
'concerned black leadership."
Obviously, Mr. Henderson is
ascribing to the view taken by the
blacks.
Henderson's comparison of the
Porth -proposal to Hitler's policy
toward Jews is quite absurd. Their
similarities are merely coin
cidental.
Henderson seems to be placing a
great deal of undeserved blame in
gj Pi ck
CTW
)o'RJA ft
K31W rIu4s i nc
WHEN OU SA
Budw.
YO'V SinI
sai C(
the 'decent white community" for
alleged silent approval. Since
when is he an authority on the
views of our governed, white
churchmen, and President Jones?
Porth -proposes a measure to
discourage large families among
the poor. This idea is very com
mendable in that smaller families
mean smaller welfare checks. This
state - already spends too much
caring for people who are merely
after a hand-out. -
if the senator's bill is ignorant,
so is Henderson. How can anyone
compare the Vietnam War to a
welfare problem? The two issues
are completely unrelated. Also, I
would like to -know just how long
this state would get along without
railroads, airlines, and farmers.
This state realizes a great deal of
return from aid to -such com
mercial concerns, while, very little
return is received from a welfare
family.
Yes, Mr. Henderson, human life
is sacred, but human life requires
an ample food supply. Any com
petent scientist will tell you that
the population explosion threatens
such a food supply. It is the poor
who threaten this food supply.
If the concerned black leader
ship can't control the size of their
families without -some outside
assistance, how can they hope to
better their lot in life?
Tll)EODORE W. SCHWARTZ.
AIR
it now,
goes double:
up
3 6-paks
he
of Beers..
Diser.
ALL!
mH1men
Why exams
for seniors?
I)EAR M R. HEEBE:
I think it is about time that
something is done for graduating
seniors instead of against them.
For what possible reason should a
sIudent with a 2.0 GPR or over, and
enough accumulated hours, be
subJected to exams? By this time,
these obstacles have very little
iniluence on graduation. A
responsible solution should be
implemented such as a decision
factor which would allow in
dividuals to accept their grades or
take'the exam. What is the big
deal?
With the accumulation of hours
and credit points,- it is virtually
impossible to lower your GPR
signilicantly. Perhaps our hard
working student government of
1icials with their increased
st ipends could find time to in
vestigate the possibilities and
probabilities.
SID FRIEDMAN
Hardware in
your hair
1)EAR MR. HEEHE:
I would like to - register a
somewhat trivial protest, but
nevertheless something to think
about. -Girls are not allowed to
appear in the lobbies of their
dorms with -their hair rolled. Yet,
they may wear it unwashed and
uncombed and in a variety of
styles much more horrid than a
lit tle hardware in their hair; they
may wear clothes which I have
heard described as "indecent," but
no curlers.
I would think that the
housemothers or head residents or
whatever they are called would be
overjoyed to see someone at least
trying to look presentable. Maybe I
should stop rolling my hair and
.just let it hang - new permanent,
trizzies. and all.
PEGGY ROGERS
More
balanced
scheduling
I)EAlR MIR. BEEBE:
T'he undersigned would like to
see scheduled for the next and
future semesters, both American
and Ioreign films which are
relevant to the disciplines of art,
histocry, culture, philosophy and
language-learning; disciplines
which are or should be, the essence
of t he university:
We support the good work of the
Film Committee in the past
Gam<
T HE GAMECOCK is published tri.weel
and weekiy during the summer semnes
holidays and exam periods. Change of at
other mal items should be sent to Dras
scription rates are $7 per year or $3 per fi
summer sessions. Bulk copies are $6
received $39,000 from the student activil
.subscrlption to the paper. Offices of THE
of the Russell House on the Uaniversity ca
777-4220. Second class postage oaw
GAMECOCK is published by the students
'opinions expressed herein do -e neces
the student body or te s. E.
lable"
several semesters, but object to
the scheduling of "popular"
American films exclusively. There
are many old American films
worth -bringing to -the University,
Just as there are many foreign
films of tremendous importance.
To refuse us these films merely
because they are old or are foreign
is unwarranted.
726 NAMES
FOLLOWED
Witten editorial
'vindictive attack'
DEAR MR. BEEBE:
I was completely turned off by
the article "Deadwood and
Students'- Rights" written by Mr.
Beebe in the May 10 issue of the
Gamecock. In his vindictive,
personal attack on Vice President
Wit ten. Mr. Beebe had nothing
more concrete -to -say than
Charles H. Witten is insensitive to
students." The only evidence for
this notion being his own personal
experience in attempting to keep
the present extravagant funding of
the Gamecock.
Indeed, I submit that 'Mr.
Beebe's article was completely
motivated by his self interest in the
Gamecock and contains no factual
reporting.
Lately, it - seems to be
fashionable to, bring innocent,
unsuspecting people to- trial by
public image. Newspapers find
such articles to 'be attractive to
certain readers in a manner
gladiator fights' were once at
tractive to' certain Romans.
However, such tactics (The trial of
Socrates being a classic example.)
are unethical and unjustified.
I assert that the entire existence
of the Gamecock is not worth -the
career of one just man; therefore,
the student body should demand a
correction to- the problem wlit
their newspaper. The fact that
such errors have arisen in the past
,i.e.. the fallacious attacks on the
Intertraternity -Council) indicates
that the editor is at fault and
therefore should be replaced.
STEPHEN H. LAFFERTY
Editor's Note: It is very difficult
for students to -accept the premise
that Mr. Witten is "innocent and
unsuspecting." Your-equating-him
with -Socrates is just 'as un
believable. Obviously, your
knowledge of the Interfraternity
Council episode and Mr. Witten
leaves a lot to be desired.
However, we agree that the editor
should be replaced.
scock
tly during the fall and spring semeser
ters with the excelion of tMIversity
dress forms, subscription~ requests and
mer A. USC. Columbia, S.C. 29206. Sub
ill and spring sem.esers and $1 for both
per 100. THE eAMECOCK this year
y fund, enterfIng full-time students to a
GAMECOCK are in Rooms 306 and 310
mpus. Phones are 777-8178, 777-4249 and
at Columbia, S.C. Although T HE
of the University of South Carolina, the
irily represent those of the University,