The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, March 08, 1971, Page Page 3, Image 3
Indochir
Chronology of
Indochina
conflict
AT BUF
Come to Bul
the hot, gold
bun with let
delicious. Ar
are FREE! Yi
cost when yi
No coupon r
1211 C0
Campus
1400 CI
2902 Tv
ia and In
1945 - First Indochina war begins
May 8, 1954 - French defeated by
Vietminh at Dienbienphu
May 8- July 24, 1954 - Geneva
Conference on Indochina
1954 - 1956 - Geneva accords
promise elections and
reunification; Diem and U.S.
renege
TH A
A/HALER
IGER KING MARC
"ger King* and wade into a Wha
en, tender fish sandwich served
tuce and tangy tartar sauce. It'
id to make it more enjoyable, the
>u get a generous, crispy order c
au buy your Whaler. Offer good
ieeded. Bring the family to Burge
Available only at
liege St. (Opposite Drayton I
Horse Horshoe Columbia, S.(
alesion Hwy. (Near K-Mart), i
m Notch Rd. (At Belt Line I
ternationa
July, 1954 - Diem appointed
premier by Head of State Bao Dai
Feb. 1955 - South East Asia Treaty
Organization formed
July 20, 1955 - Talks scheduled to
start for consultation on all
Vietnam election scheduled for
July 1956 to reunite country. Diem
refuses to hold talks.
H -6-19
ler! Discover
on a toasted
s absolutely
French Fries
>f them at no
March 6-19.
rKing!
lall and
rest Columbia
Blvd.)
1 Law:F
By TONY
The United States' involvemer
disrupt the orderly process of I
the actions of any other single c
civilization. The United States
Geneva Agreements of 1954, the
the United Nations Charter. Th
Indochina and its people, has ev
In May of 1954, the French were
defeated at Dienbienphu by the
Vietminh forces, symbolically
marking the end of the First In
dochina War. Negotiations were
immediately initiated in Geneva to
attempt to provide for a fair and
orderly peace. Participating in the
conference were Cambodia, the
Democratic Republic of Vietnam,
France, Laos, the People's
Republic of China, the State of
(South) Vietnam, the Union of
Soviet Socialist Republics, the
United Kingdom, and the United
States.
Despite the overwhelming
victory won by the Vietminh
revolutionaries over the French in
Indochina, the communists made
many concessions. In Vietnam,
they accepted a temporarily
divided country; in Cambodia,
they withdrew the demand of
recognition for the Khmer Issarak
liberation force; and in Laos, the
Pathet Lao agreed to join a
coalition government. British
Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden
commented, "the Geneva Accords
were about .the best bargain
France and the associated States
could have made."
In retrospect, the most im
portant aspect of the Geneva
Accords is what they do not say.
They in no way partitioned Viet
nam into two separate and in
dependent nations. Rather, Ar
ticles one and fourteen of the
Agreements of Cessation of
Hostilities in Vietnam make it
quite explicit that the division at
the seventeenth parallel is only a
means of temporarily separating
the two opposing forces in a
(guerilla) war without clear cut
lines. Article Six of the Final
Declaration of the Geneva Con
ference clarifies the temporarty
nature of the division even further
when it states that the seventeenth
parallel is only a "provisional
military demarcation line" that
"should not in any way be con
strued as a political or territorial
boundary."
All the countries that attended
the conference, with the exception
of the State of (south) Vietnam and
the United States, signed the
Geneva Agreements. Despite the
fact that the U.S. delegate at
Geneva, Walter Bedell Smith,
promised that the United States
would respect the Geneva Accords
and "refrain from the use of force
to disturb them," testimony
revealed by General .James Gavin
and the formation of the South
East Asian Treaty Organization
(SEATO) demonstrate that the.
U.S. never, in reality, had any
intentions of - respecting the
Geneva Accords. According to
General Gavin, before the Ink was
dry at Geneva, "Admiral Radford
was emphatically In favor of
landing a force In the Haiphong
Hanoi area even If it meant war
with Red China. In this he was fully
supported by the Chief of Staff of
the Air Force and the Chief of
Naval Operations." However, a
compromise was reached "to
sunnart a aa. S$ Veaa...
art One.
HERMAN
it in Indochina has done more to
nternational law than, perhaps,
ountry in the history of modern
has ignored and violated the
Geneva Agreements of 1962, and
e U.S. in Its attempt to control
en violated its own Constitution.
The South East Asia 'Treaty
Organization makes U.S. in
tentions even more explicit.
SEATO, initiated by U.S.
Secretary of State John Foster
Dulles, was established only two
months after the signing of the
Geneva Accords. SEATO
unilaterally extended protection to
the "free territory under the
jurisdiction of the State of Viet
nam." The initiator of SEATO,
Secretary of State John Foster
Dulles, in explaining the South
East Asia Treaty Organization
said: "SEATO's principal purpose
was to provide our President with
legal authority to interVene in
Indochina."
Thus, it is not surprising that
despite the Geneva guarantees for
reunification and elections (Article
seven of the Final Agreement
states: "...general elections will be
held in July 1956..."), elections and
reunification have yet to take
place.Ngo Dinh Diem was installed
as President with American aid in
violation of Article fourteen which
states: "Pending the general
elections which will bring about
the unification of Vietnam, the
conduct of civil administration in
each regrouping zone shall be in
the hands of the party whose forces
are to be regrouped there in virtue
of the present agreeement."
(French and Vietminh). Diem
stated that the communists
refused to allow the election.
However, the evidence reported
by the International Control
Commission, consisting of Canada,
India, and Poland which was
est"blished to supervise the
elections; indicates that the
American-supported Diem regime
refused to even consider the
Geneva Agreements. According to
the International Control Com
mission (ICC) it was the Saigon
regime which refused to nar
ticipate in the consultative con
ferences required before the
election by the Geneva Accords. A
climax of sorts was reached, as
reported by the New York Times of
July 21st, 1955, when instead of
initiating the consultative con
ferences, Diem staged an attack on
the hotel where the members of the
Commission were staying. In
President Dwight D. Eisenhower's
book, "Mandate for Change," he
states: "I have never talked or
corresponded with a person
knowledgeable in Indochinese
affairs who did not agree that had
elections been held, possibly 80 per
cent of the population would have
voted for the communist Ho Chi
Minh." Time magazine sustains
Eisenhower's analysis of the
popularity of Ho in its Jan. 3, 1950
issue: "Both the masses of
peasants and great numbers of
Vietnamese nationalists, political
reformers, hopeful idealists, and
the like, firmly believe the Viet
mninh Communist leader ...
Consequently, it appears that
elections weren't held due to
American fears of a communmist
victory. As a result, the Viet
namese dream of a unifled country
free .from foreign (Amwtip)h.
Intervention hasyetWnbe semmenes