Historical Newspapers of South Carolina

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

Tree Speech' The University of California campus at Berkley was the scene of chaos and dissen sion last week while more than seven hun dred young people were arrested for staging a massive sit down strike protesting regula tions concerning politicking on the campus. While the dispute raged on between stu dents and administration, scores of pickets disrupted classes and absenteeism was high at the nation's largest university. Both the demonstration, finally broken up by police carrying scores bodily out of the administration building, and the picketing had this aim: Pressure the university into permitting recruiting and fund-raising any where on campus for such off-campus causes as civil rights work in the South. Such now is allowed in only one place on campus and there it is carefully regulated. The campus wide strike was motivated by an organiza tion calling itself the Free Speech Movement and labeled a "willful minority of radical students" by university president Clark Kerr. The faculty raised $85,000 to bail the Student Behavic Spectator behavior at the recent USC UNC basketball game has brought frowns of criticism upon the Carolina student body once again. To those not familiar with the University, the unruly condLuct displayed by several eager beavers last week appears indicative of the maturity of the typical Carolina stu dent. Throwing debris on the basketball court and yelling insults to the opposing team's players and the game officials is certainly not becoming to supposedly well mannered college students. The University was fortunate in securing one of the most sought-after basketball coaches in the nation, Frank McGuire. Coach McGuire accepted the position here to work with the Carolina basketball team and make it a top-ranking team in the country. He assumied his problems would be with the team itself. not the spectators. The need to restrain outbursts of enthusi err. Lewis Where, Oh, Wher( Ever since Mr. Hell called and call the campts Mr. Watson camne, the telephone i h ic.Y has hadl an impact of some sort gtinochw on our lives. When male op- ld.Drn h erators developed the tendency teei sal to express their frustrations rahn e,lU over the wires they were re- hs-ta( al placedl by smiling young ladies -te utty with the stereotype faces we al h iewl have come to knowv anid love,. ri il esl But despite the ef forts of great asee.los companies like AT&T, there ex- btsrne ist certain annoyances that conme at weed part and parcel with using the fn h vro phone. Especially so here at afin fmn Carolina.pu,I(illth The campus phone is a great hada 20 convenience to all of us, but at anlin aiv times we are hit by that prover- gtsmtigt bial monkey wrench that can m omaeh ruin the efficiency of the great- We eund est machine: inefficiency. This stlrign.n usually happens when you are aqureofnI trying dlesp)erately to contact Inerdigt someone whose number is not Ti niln listed in the student dlirectory. lroe xei At sch atimeyou an oly caveleahe cmpuso In tenxt ew ear, Cro- sficitenhtch Ylpo lin wil eole ito shoo ~ rgetmin. touhwi subsant:d sze s th Sttes lady. toin thed fora(lisso.TheUniersty s tY for usualy lute aciitis fr is sudets, fehng yout, but an nde-stffel fculy, nd ~- hat se av dar abthe dulinewill oritl be Saeo. ~L~'ler /. answefred progsn bein stang up TheGamcoc i inendd cIL(s toknd dent oinion nd nen.dWee anveeto tudet or emberofth fissind stand eters mut b sine delpus thiaed Stat wit th wrters ailng d- ttiIandS rangI arn dress.We wilwithhldgthe somthing the requsts t. Hwevr, w (Wheun I rturIned willrintno leter hat stworl rining.iy Tehins icien a Or 'Anarchy? protestors out of jail; however, one re mained there on a charge of possessing a marijuana cigarette. Apparently students, thinking that poli tics is a necessary part of the educational process, are taking it upon themselves to bring political activities of one sort or an other on campus. The politicking in this instance was precipitated by the "free speech" call. However, the issue grew out of proportion and resulted in a state of near anarchy. The United States has watched and in some cases viewed with alarm the students' and faculty members' demonstrations of col leges and universities not only in America but also in Ankara and Saigon, Tokyo and Caracas. A college education is supposed to produce rationally thinking men and women; universities are not supposed to provide a sea of rioters. Political violence of this nature is most assuredly one aspect of education that our institutions of higher learning can readily do without. -Reardon or Must Improve asm in the future is imperative for several reasons, these uncalled for actions not only hinder the team recruiting program, but also revolt alumni, faculty, administrative officials and other students attending the game. Although no plans are being made for a new Field House in the immediate future, there is a possibility that one will be built to meet the needs of the University. How ever, it may reach a point where the Uni versity does not feel it worth while to spend the money for a new Field House when in actuality it would just serve as a bigger and better arena for the three-ring circus that several rude students have made of the present basketball court. We suggest that if this happens again, the students responsible should be removed from the stands and not allowed to view any athletic events in the future. -Reardon Levy a Is The Operator? operator. Ilere their cause. It would appear that u can't always the line is in heavy use at times th that young and disrei.ardedl at others. Why? daylight hours This is the question. Could it he no difficulty in that our favorite information when the sun dispenser has a friend with ness has fallen whom she care on lengthy Almost invari- nightly conversations? Or could be either busy it be that when she enjoys a ved to ring un- snack, she unplugs the switch t this sound a board, or (does she simply disre gard the flashing light indicat n an attempt to ing an incoming call ? In any kedI number of ease it seems fairly clear that living on cam- something is left to be desired. friendly switch- Telephones are placed in the The line rang, dlorms as a convenience to the ang. I went to students. From time to time it >drink, leaving is necessary to call for informa Iding the phone. tion. That information should I found the line he readily available. At present, all, more than it is sometimes gained only with uour had passedl. difficulty. I sincerely hope that the number, the University operator will ndl several simi- realize that this problem dtoes need previously, exist, andl that efforts will he speculate as to made to remedy the situation. y' Society: Stimulas )ULOS riations for im- lish and mathematics, e problems be- We students can meet the nts of this Uni- problem ef an understaffed fac affct he ery ulty. Fundamentally, an inter affuction.ver ested( and motivated student ,ruatin hodyV attracts professors. We ave complained studlents can improve the edluca cause, but only tional facilities of the University of life. Yet, by encouraging the voters of the Iour counties, State to ask for iceasedl ap See there the propriations for the school, and ss-and let us by~ e'vntuaIlly ohtaining the right the immediate to vote -it age I8-a right exer dvancement of cised now b)y Georgia youth. Our cause is clear-a greater the problem of University in a growing South. ns. Raising ad- We can achieve our goal by is not the an- working constructively with the Carolina n'eds faculty and administration, not -ated citizens to ineffectively against them. Let .However, we us b)egin. andl( of our high (ED)ITOR'S NOTE: Euphra meet their re- <lin ILiterary/ Society sponsors preparing up- "Stimulus" ailong with a radio for college forum on W(USC. The Society p)rofessors andl discusses topics of stu<dent inter are wastedl in est at its weeklyl senate sessions uool level Eng- w'hirA nrc onan to tho public.) P(N(NMOGRESSN MERRY CI7 I-,3 CHRISTMAS! Dogged Determination Christ climbed down from His bare Tree this year and ran to where there were no rootless Christmas trees hung with candycanes and breakable stars. Christ climbed down from His bare Tree this year and ran to where there were no gilded Christmas trees and no tinsel Christmas trees and no pink plastic Christmas trees and no gold Christmas trees and no black Christmas trees and no powerblue Christmas trees hung with electric candles and encircled by tin electric trains and clever cornball relatives. Christ climbed down from His bare Tree this year and ran to where no intrepid Bible salesman covered the territory in two-tone Cadillacs and where no Sears Roebuck creches complete with plastic babe in manger arrived by parcel post The babe by special delivery and where no televised Wise Men praised the Lord Calvert Whiskey. Christ climbed down from His bare Tree and ran to where no fat handshaking stranger in a red flannel suit went around passing himself off as some sort of North Pole saint crossing the desert to Bethlehem Pennsylvania in a Volkswagen sled drawn by rollicking adirondack reindeer with German names and bearing sacks of Humble Gifts from Saks Fifth Avenue for everybody's imagined Christ child. Christ climbed down from His bare Tree this year and ran to where no Bing Crosby carolers groaned of a tight Christmas and where no Radio City angels iceskated wingless thru a winter wonderland into a jinglebell heaven daily at 8:30 with Midnight Mass matinees. Christ climbed down from His bare Tree this year and softly stole away into some anonymous Mary's womb again where in the darkest night of everybody's anonymous soul He awaits again an unimaginable and impossibly Immaculate Reconception the very craziest of Second Comings. L. Ferlinghetti, Couney Island of the Mind A GA4cocI'& CROWING FOR A GREATER UNIVERSITY OF SOUTil CAROUJNA Member of Associated Collegiate Press Fouindeid January 30. 1908. with Robert Elliott G.onzales as the first Editor, "The Gamecock" is published by and for the students of the U niversity of South Carolina weekly, ons Friudays, during thme college year except on holidays and during examinations. The opinions expreCssed by columnists andl letter writers are not necessarily those of "The Gamecock." "The Gamecock" encourages i.tters tom ihe Editor, bumt all L.etters nmust lie signed. Pmublishing does not constitute an endorsemenit. The right to edit or withhold frosn pubhlcation any letter is reserved. "The Gamecock" is represented nationally by National Advertising Service, Inc. The publlicatilon is a member osf the Associated Collegiate Press. Time Nationsal College Press Service, and the Intercollegiate Press. Subscription rates sre $3.00 per year. EDITOR SHEILA REARDON MANAGING EDITOR .. HARRIET HOLLAND BUSINESS MANAGER .LARRY BARRETT FREEDOM OF SPEECH Editor The Gamecock Dear Miss Reardon: I would like to take issue with a point made by both Mr. Donald E. Weatherbee and Mr. Ogal P. Crews in their letters in the De cember 4 issue of The Gamecock. The former stated and the latter implied that there ought to be (as in fact there are) certain limits to freedom of verbal ex pression. It is not the self-imposed limits, which Mr. Weatherbee mentions, of "good taste," "common decency," "responsibility," and "truth," whatever these may be, that concerns me. These are mat ters for the individual himself to decide upon. What is significant are any limits which may be im posed on free speech by the law. Mr. Weatherbee has presented no agrument in support of his posi tion favoring such limits, and the metaphor of Justice Holmes of fered by Mr. Crews is only just that. I offer an argument against any censorship at all. Any society which intends to survive must be progressive, and to remain open to progress it is necessary that there be an ex change of ideas. Now, how can a society which recognizes this need for free speech, as ours does, properly set any limits to that "free" speech? It is obvious that it cannot, for in so doing it denies at the very outset that principle which it meant to uphold. The principle of free speech is the sort of principle which, if it is to be maintained at all, neces sarily admits no exceptions. For a society which allows to begin with that it may be all wrong (which is the basis for the prin ciple of free speech) has no way of ever knowing whether or not the exceptions it makes may be the very ones upon which its present basis will be shown to be at fault. The only thing which can be immune to this objection is the principle of free speech itself and whatever assumptions it rests on. It can never if accepted, and I think rightly, be discarded. Any thing else, once this principle is acknowledged, must, however, re main subject to modification or rejection. Thus, if we are to accept it, free speech must be unlimited. This applies to all present limita tions here in the United States, in particular to those limitations on "obscenity" (whatever this might be) and libel, which defy the very basis of our society. HARRY BOOTH 0 * 0 IIATTWLE CONTINUES Editor The Gamecock Dear Miss Rea rdon: This is in reference to C. Ham mond's column in the December 4, 1964 issue of The Gamecock. While agreeing with the essence of Mr. Ilammond's article, allow me to correct him on two minor points: 1. As self - anointed arbiter, Mr. Hammond, you should first obtain the facts of the case. As one of the co signators and s p eak in g from first-hand experience, let me point out that my classes were not used in the manner so described, and I, therefore, believe a retrac tion is in order. Such a cavalier treatment of facts will make you an excellent defense attorney. 2. It is surprising how much is known about a letter andl its authors dlespite the pur ported fact that no one has seen the letter. 3. While "our" letter has been misconstrued to be an at tack on the present editor, it was in fact a criticism on a number of contributors who have ap)pearedl on the secondl page of this paper during the past year. 4. As for the childishness of letter writing, let me again add a wordl of personal dlis sent. Many of my colleagues as well as a number of stu dlents have on numerous oc casions indicatedl to me that sonme of the articles and statements in the news paper are so absurd as not to merit retort. I am firmly of the opposite opinion and therefore believe these in dividuals to be as culpable as several of the columnists. The newspaper is, whether formally or informally, a representative and spokes man of the University of South Carolina. It is not a ERS' sonal vendettas. Its articles on public affairs should not reflect the flippancy of the "coffee klatch." Its articles should not be guilty of the egregious types of errors which any student who has taken a basic course in any academic discipline would know enough to avoid. The newspaper is a c a m p u s newspaper and not a chatty fraternity bulletin. It is as- A sumed to be representative of campus opinion and of the University by other sec tions of the country. The paper's failings are, there fore, taken to reflect di rectly upon the University and e v e r y one affiliated with it. What more damna ble charge of dereliction can be leveled against us? It seems what has happened is that the paper has not only failed to live up to this responsibility bat, by Mr. Hammond's admission that children will be children, seems completely oblivious to the responsibilities en tailed. S. J. CARAMALIS Political Science Dept. 0 0 0 DECISION IS DUE Editor The Gamecock Dear Miss Reardon: After reading The Gamecock's November 20 article concerning the future of the USC Honor System, my disgust for the atti tude of our administrative offi cials greatly increased. Under a pretense of allowing more stu dent participation in a supposedly policy decision, these officials have allowed more indecisiveness to exist around an enigma that should have been solved many semesters ago. It was pointed out in that article that the Honor System has been in trouble since the 1920's. If this is true, why should a special committee be formed NOW in order to decide the Sys tem's future? If the present is any indication of the past, there has been no future and indeed, no honor for the System on this campus. Yet, past and present administrations have let this dis cussion of a defunct concept con tinue, perhaps at the reluctance of offending the desires of the Board of Trustees. I have yet to discover the real difference that the Honor System contributes to the morale of Carolina. Certainly the effect on thc students is a minor one, as pointed out in that Gamecock article by the few cases brought before the Honor Board. There just aren't enough students in terested in officially disapproving of the many dishonorable actions that occur on campus. The decision to let certain stu dents have any immediate voice in this affair I accept with most revulsion because we have paid directors to make such decisions. If students are to have a voice in the continuation or the abolish ment of the Honor System, I sug gest it be done by student body balloting. Whatever is decided, this ques- y tion of the Honor System should be settled THIS YEAR. I believe the decision is long over due. RONALD T. ELLIOTT * 0 S STUDENT BEHAVIOR : Editor T he Ga mecock Dear Mis88 Rea rdon: As freshmen attending the USC-UNC game, we were sur prised, to say the least, at the less than adult attitude displayed by our fellow students. A normal amount of jeering was expected of some factions but, to our sur prise, many more than a few were involved in this mammoth dlisplay of childish behavior. We must say in all seriousness that, for the first time during our stay at this institution, we were truly ashamed to be a member of this school's student body. We are not trying to put our selves in any "lofty position," but are merely attempting to point out that this form of behavior was certainly uncalled for, but most important, defaming to the University. In the Sunday morning edition of "The State," the University was degraded by the statement dlescribing us, the students, as the "usual, unruly South Carolina Student Body." This is proof positive that at least one-half of the residents of the state of South Carolina were again re minded of our rowdiness which has been displayed so often in the