The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, April 10, 1964, Page Page Two, Image 2
Moral ROvo
"Morality is a private and costly luxury."
Thus spoke Henry Brooks Adams. Was
this statement true then? Is it now?
During the past few years there has been
widespread discussion concerning sexual
morality professed and practiced by many
college students. This code, currently in the
process of a distinct revolution, may not be
held by all college students, but the per
centage who do is seemingly on the rise.
Although the new morality finds its most
extensive expression in northern and mid
eastern universities (including the Ivy
League institutions), its effect will undoubt
edly appear with more frequent and en
compassing influen-. Surveys and reports
made of the USC student body show a
definite position of conservatism on the cam
pus.
The purpose of this editorial is neither to
condemn nor condone. However, it is hoped
that it will provoke rational thought on this
subject which has been labeled the "pre
monition of the total dissolution of our so
ciety and the harbinger of a more sensible
and rational ethic."
In approaching the issue it must be real
ized that promoters of the moral revolution
are not the colleges themselves. When a stu
dent first enters college, lie is not immedi
ately changed into a moral degenerate, but
rather he brings to the college the analyzed
knowledge and concepts he has acquired dur
ing the first 18 years of his experience with
society. The college merely inherits these
problems from the society of which it is a
part.
As is generally accepted, the norms of so
ciety are basically conservative - they
change at a slower rate than do actual prac
tices. Thus an individual may be taught such
ethics as pre - marital chastity and post
marital fidelity. Yet, he looks around and
fvd. a world uhin, lvnr% er s.ppor. these
ethics. Here begins the conflict.
Once one becomes aware of these con
flicting values, he determines his own in
dividual code of ethics. Ile becomes tolerant
of others, though they do not practice his
code.
The basis of this new college morality
seems to be the belief that a boy and a girl
who have established a "meaningful rela
tionship" have the moral right, and are
completely justified, in engaging in pre
marital activities.
This "relationship" aspect was well stated
by Miami Psychologist Granville Fisher in
the January 24, 1964 issue of Time maga
zine. "Sex is not a moral question. For an
swers you don't turn to a bodly of absolutes.
The criterion should not be, 'Is it morally
right or wvrong,' hut, 'Is it socially feasible,
Ae 6A4GCd
CROWING FOR A GREATER
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROL
Member of Associated Collegiate Prei
Funded January 30, 1908. with Robert Elliott Gonsal
Editor, "The Gamecock" is published by and for the it
University of South Carolina weekly, on Fridays. durn
year except on holidays and during examinations.
The opinions expressed by columnists and letter wr
necessarliy those of "The Gamecock." "The Gamiecock
Letters to the Editor, but alU Letters must be signed. P.
not constitute an endorsement. The right to edit or
publication any letter is reserved.
"The Gamecock" is represenited naittinally by Nationi
Service, Inc. The publication as a smemsber oft the Associal
Press, The National College Prvess Service, .and the interco
Subscription rates, are $3.00 per year.
EDITOR DONI
MANAGING EDITOR SHElL
BUSINESS MANAGER LARRl
Assistant Managing Editor H
Advertising Manager
Assistant Advertising Manager
News Editor
Copy Editor
Campus Editor
Feature Editor C
Assistant Feature Editor
Society Editor.
Sports Editor
Circulation Manager
Exchange Editor
Chief Photographer
Business Secretary .Rut
Chief Reporter.
PHOTOGRAPHERS: Ralph Jarrells, Henry R
Gaskins.
COLUMNISTS: Todd Wilson, Dave Henry, Carl I
Narrow, Bill Savage, Julia Drake, Zazel Wi]
STAFF MEMBERSt Kay Hughey, Virgisua Maxwell, Harry
EW.ott, Henry Elchel, Eddie Hoffmeyer, Jame Smith, Marci
C1sttenn Betty Cesrton, Em Heins, inda Martin, iJsa la
Edwards, Susan Lndaen, EfrId KCeisler, Mike Camp. Kathle',
Tal Harriet LaBorde, iJnda Cordell, Carol Price, Joyce
Bresr ee Jee Carrett, Barbara Moore, Eva Edleehurg,(
ses, Des Preste. Deb w4atkds,. Isabell Secreet. iJnda Shasple
ma,mea. *e aeq Va.s me.la WasMa..
lutlon No. 2?
is it personally healthy and rewarding, will
it enrich human life?'"
Dr. Fisher further commented that many
Protestant church men are beginning to feel
the same way. "They are no longer shaking
their finger because the boys and girls give
in to natural biological urges and experiment
a bit. They don't say, 'Stop, you're wrong,'
but, 'Is it meaningful?'"
A recently published book, "Sex and the
College Girl," written by Gael Greene, con
tained several points of significance con
cerning this new moral revolution. The in
formation was accumulated from interviews
of 614 students from 102 colleges and uni
versities across the nation. Some of Miss
Greene's findings are:
1) The most powerful influence on the
campus today is the cool coed, "calmly, cas
ually, matter-of-factly erotic."
2) Traditional moral codes are meaning
less to both the "cool" coed and the more
conservative college girl of the sixties.
3) Sexual candor has increased to the
point of exhibitionism, breeding an atmos
phere where sexual freedom - and sexual
panic - can flourish.
4) The gap is widening between the in
creasingly emancipated college girl and the
steadfastly - double-standard male under
graduate.
5) The collapse of traditional morality,
the breakdown of parental authority and
adult control, is making way for the new sex
ethic - sex with affection or "it's right if
you 're engaged, pinned, lavaliered, going
steady or - 'in love.'"
The permissive society today has granted
its offspring the wherewithal, e.g., money
and freedom of action, to foster its sophis
tication and knowledge, and thus to start
this revolution snowballing.
On many campuses defiance of traditional
moral ethics has become an academic pur
suit - something to be studied, analyzed
and inevitably rationaized. The challenge
of "intellect ualizing" one into promiscuous
activities is becoming an admirable under
taking.
The currei "innovations" in morality,
while -.-initely revolutionary in nature, are
a direct result of an earlier moral change
in mankind's history - the Roaring 20's.
This was a period when youth swept aside
the Victorian era and ushered in what it
termed the Jazz Age. Young people had
something against which to revolt - the
strict Victorian stindards set down by
forceful parents.
The youth of today are the offspring of
those rebels, who now remember only bits
and pieces of that code they buried. Modern
young people thus find themselves living
an unrestrained life, but one in which there
are no concrete or definite guide Posts.
Victorians orientatedl themselves toward
love andI away from sex. Seemingly, history
and the peop)le who make it have formulated
a practice completely opposite in nature. As
an afterthought: Kahlil Gibran once saidl,
"lie who wears his morality lbut as his
best garment were better naked." -Russell
I cExchung
Tulaune oU,iversity:
ABob Hope appeared in person
on March 20, 1964.
8 1~ niaversi.ty ofr C:,ooado:
d,as othe S t u d(e t 5 chargedI of using
the collese marijuana.
iters are not [iniversity of Virginia.:
iIlihn doso~ard1 of visitors orders1 the
ithhol fron acceptance of college females --
I Advetisingno less thani 600 each class b)e
edCleite ginning this September.
T mLe giniverress.
JA RUSSELL D)r. Grip discusses problem of
A REARDON purse-snatching. lHe says that it
Y BARRETT is "not as urgent as reported."
arriet Holland 1/niverdt:y of Florida,:
Bill Savage Albert, the alligator mascot o,f
Wayne Weible the university was gator-nappe.d,
Pat Roessle but was soon returned.
Susan Lindau Food service "OK's serving of
Sara Elliott booze" - w h i s k y sours and
arol Robinson vodka collins for lunch; Bloody
Precious Zurlo M a r y s and screwd rivers for
Reba Hutto breakfast. - April Fool.
Tom Hunter Kansas %- ifniversity:
Carter Crew. K. S. U. has a new stude(nt this
Winkie Young semester. She is taking feature
Leon Bridge writ,ing courses. This amazing
hie Henderson student graduated from college
Sig Huitt in 1890, and is 93 -- as they
abertson, Bob say - you're ne'ver too 01(1.
C:hapel lill:
lendricks., Ted The "Da,ily Tar Heel" de(fines
de. a hanker as "a pawntbroker with
waldrop Ickie a manicure."
a Dalzief, Jackie 'Staniford I !nive'rsity:
rnnos, Nancy Jo
Higgins. Cwen G uesat s p eak er, Henry A.
Hol land, Andy
:aro Fripe. Ann K iss(inger) to speak on arms
ngful
Us
nships?
E R S
call reference to the barrage of
"indignant criticisms" that the
"black blight" editorial of March
13 received.
Yes, Sir, it warms my heart at
the realization of so many a]
truists among our Carolina stu
dents. I would deem it an honor
and a great privilege to be able
to address my sincere gratitude
to all the "do-gooders" individu
ally, but for sake of brevity, I
am forced to direct my attention
to one circe who very modestly
refers to herself as a "Yankee
'nirger lover'." (I'm curious as
to whether her e o n s c i e n c e
prompted her to make this honor
able confession - Miss Carlson,
you're much too naive.)
Miss Carlson's unselfish letter
of March 20th was "violently op
posed to irrational, illogical, ir
responsible, and uneducated opin
ions." Admirable! (And one may
assume that all opinions oppos
ing hers must inevitably fall into
this category.)
In Miss Carlson's great haste
to correct all of the white's in
justices toward the "oppressed,"
she obviously overlooked com
mending the Negroid race on its
outstanding achievements on the
continent of Africa, in spite of
white men exploiting and forcing
them to relinquish their ties to
an "ancient and advanced civili
zation," such as theirs, and "go
back to the bush."
Our "y o u n g e r civilization"
should emulate them and observe
their many cultural advantages,
realizing, of course, that the so
called .ignorance, cannibalism,
vulgarism, abject p)overty, "witch
dloctors," diseases, and the gen
erlal vegetation and lethargy of
the nrasses is merely jealous
propaganda on the part of the
whites and never really' existed;
that they would have attained
their m illenniunm had not the
''white blight'' s h a m e fuly
''stunted their growth.''
No one can qjuestion such su
preme logic as embhod ied in Miss
(Carison 's footnote, however, i.e.,
"'to encou rage in tegrat ion and(
in terma rriag(' (in 0 r' d e r ) to
(elinminate the race problem b)y
having one big race." There's
certa.inly nothing '"irrational, i r
responsible', a n d uneducated"l'
about that! While we're at it we
could( go) a ste'p further and
(eradicate mankind, thus, el imi -
nating ou r biggest problemi.
(CHARLES HLEVIN
A Suggestion
lEditor
T heG mecock
/)v'ar .l/iss IRussell:
This is ini resp5jonse to the
letters wriitten by Mr. Crangle
an Mr1 I s. (Ca raai cS(Once rin g
the editoriail of March 13.
I have' a suggest.ion for them
...erhaps th(ey would like to
spendl a few days in .J ack sonvi lle.
.JOIIN FEASTlEli
TIhe G'amecock is intended
primarily as a voice for stu
dent opinion and news. We
welcome letters from any
student or member ot the
f aculty under the tollowing
provisions.
Letters must be signed
with the writer's mailing ad
dress. We will withhold the
writer's name if the letter
requests it. flowever, we
will print no letter that is
Meam
Relatio
[L E T1
The Political Truth
Editor
The Gamecock
Dear Miss Russell:
I wish to congratulate you on
the e x c e l I e n t editorial of the
thirteenth. The editorial exempli
fies fabulous penmanship and
word play, to say nothing of the
political truth.
We have certainly reached the
point where a minority, goaded
by agitators, is dictating to the
unwilling majority.
I read of an instance in a
northern city where a policeman
caught a Negro boy robbing a
candy store. With a knife, the
Negro attacked the policeman.
In pure self-defense, the police
man shot the boy. The NAACP
demanded that the policeman be
fired, or the NAACP would
order a general riot. Naturally
the policeman was fired! Is this
just? Is it wrong for a man to
defend himself? When will the
American people get the back
bone to suppress this autocracy?
The government has restric
tions on the KKK, but none on
the Black Muslims. As it stands
today, the white man is the one
who should be demanding equal
rights. Thanks for speaking up.
JAMIE ii. COCKFIELD
0 0 0
USC 'Altruists'
TEditor
The Gamecock
I)oar Miss Russell:
I feel that I am among the un
fortunate majority of students
who, with mixed emotions, read
The Ga~mecock 's controversial ed
torials, b\it, instead of writing a
letter to the editor, 1 simply
rationalize and endl up g,iving
little more than lip service to
the supercil.iousness of others.
Well, "these are the times that
try men's souls. ' I would like to
IInlir-Rhy~ne College:
D)efines happiness:
Ilappi ness is a~ po)stponed test
you weren't prepa red for.
llappiness is 1-1 minutes of extra
II apinesi(s is a professor who a r
rives 11 minutes late.
11 appi ness is thaut check from
hiom e.
II appi ness is hiavi ng one girl at
home andl one (on campJus.
IIhappiness is a textbook costing
less than $5.
Ihappiness is typing "'The End"'
onl a ter I1 papeMr.
11 appi ness is avoiding the drta ft
without get tinug ma rriedl.
hlappiness is slee'pinlg in classes
and not missing anything.
hlappiness is findling hot water
on a cold morning.
happine.ss is seeing movies "For
Adults Only."
llappiness is being ignoredl by
the D)ean of Students.
hlappiness is a park ing p 1 a e e
within walking dIi s t a n e e of
cl ass.
Ilappiness is a soft bed at 1 :00
A.M.
TIhet ouItcomTe oif the Daitrtmiouth
Winter Carnival's ski meet wa.s
as follows: F'irst Place was Mid
dIeury with a 588.1 ; S e e o n d
P 1 a e e was D)artmnouth with a
581.7; and Third Place was Wil
linma with a KAA6.
TODD
Fa
IN this column let me give a
final review of the n e w I y
proposed Student Body Constitu
tion. Since our last reports we
have held two constitutional con
ventions, and several sli g h t
changes have been made. The
basic framework, however, re
mains the same.
Let me remind you that the
basic change of this constitution
from the one under which we
now serve is a reorganization so
that s t u d e n t government can
properly function. As I stated
earlier, student government as it
now exists rests solely in the
hands of the Student Body Presi
dent. A strong president pro
duces a strong student govern
nient while the weak president
weakens the entire student gov
ernment framework. This should
not be.
U NDER the new proposal the
Student 1B o d y President is
taken from the Senate and made
an executive officer - exactly
where he should be. This, of
course, opens the way for the
vice president to move into the
presiding office within the Sen
ate. The president will have the
veto power, but the veto may be
overridden by two-thirds major
ity of the Senate. This is merely
part of the system of checks and
balances.
The Senate is thus left to do
that for which it was first con
stituted - pass legislation. This
should actually he the sole pur
pose of the Student Senate. The
Senate will, of course, have its
own officers, committees, etc.
These will then be able to devote
all of their time to work of the
Senate, thus making for a more
--Carl Hei
Attendance
Regulations
'Antiquated'
O N page 13, 141 and 15 of the
1963 - 6.1 Car-olina Commun -
ity, the attendance regulations
for undergr-aduates at the Uni
ver-sity are specified. Briefly the
regulations are:
"In regular session, a maxi
mum of four- unexcused absences
is permitted in each course for
which a studlent is enrolledl. For
any course offered in a summer
terni a student is permitted a
max,imum of three unexcused
absences." In all courses students
arec expectedI to attend 75 per
cenit of all meetings.
" IN the occurrence of an ad
~ditional unexcused absence,
a studlent is dlroppedl fr-om a
e o u r s e with the grade FA
enteredl upon his a e a dI e' m i e
record."l
Voluntar-y attendance is thus
a pr-ivilege for those students
who in the previous regular se
mester- stai ned a grade point
ratio) of not less than 4.00 out
of ax possible 6.00. However, the
75 per cent attendance r-egula
tion must he met ;in the sum
mer session voluntary attend
ance- is not allowed at all.
OUrR contention is that these
all-inclusive regulations are
somewhat arbitrary, antiquated,
andl Victor-ian. One might well
ask what the purpjose of attendl
ing the University might be.
Is is to get ani education in
the brioadest possible terms, or is
it to he re-gulatedl tn the point
that life is completely circum
sc-rib)ed by arbitrar-y and com
pulsor-y rules? We admnit that
there is a definite trendl, not
only at USC but in other schools,
andi in the national government
itself, towardl centralization of
powe r.
We do not contendl that put
ting everyone. at USC on volun
tary attendance is going to solve
all the proble.ms, because the-r"
will always be some studlents
who will take more than the
twelve maximum. We do believe
that the atudent. a Carlin -
VILSON
- Revised
Constitution
ces Student Vote
efficient and better run organi
zation.
T HE other area which we have
constantly 4 t r e s e d is the
judicial. This is actually the first
attempt on the part of students
to have any voice in the judiciary
matters on campus. What we
have instituted, or wish to in.
sbitute, is not a ruling body, but
r a t h e r a body which makes
recommendations to the proper
Dean of Men or Women. They
will hear only minor cases with
all of the major cases, as al
ways, going straight to the
Faculty Disciplinary Committee.
Elections procedures, qualifi
cations, etc., are also defined and
explained on a general basis to
insure that elections will not be
handled in a haphazard way and
to insure that all students are
informed of the various times
which are important in elections.
T HERE are a number of other
small changes and improve
ments incorporated within the
proposed constitution, but they
are of less significance so I will
not comment further on them.
In conclusion, let me say that
Student Government here at Car
olina has never really func
tioned; it has not been possible.
Now we have the opportunity to
move ahead and make consider
able progress. This next year
will, however, be the one which
will most decide the future of
Student Government if the new
proposal is adopted by the stu
dent body and approved by the
faculty.
VOTE yes tor the students of
Carolina; vote yes for a
greater Carolin.i; vote yes for
the new constitution.
mdricks
serve a better deal as far as at
tendance regulations are con
cernedl.
J UST what purpose is served
by giving a student an FA in
a course which conceivably he
might have passed if allowed to
continue? Is the University so
eager to be "tough" that it will
dleny a student the chance to
pass a course if he has taken
frive or more cuts? Is that demo
cratic and consistent with the
American ideal of fair play? We
say, No!
E realize that this subject is
somewhat controversial and
throughout the campus areas of
agreement are limited. Our plan
as submitted below is not perfect,
but we do feel it is worthy of
consideration by the powers thatW
be.
For freshmen and sophomores
in courses regarded as basic, we
feel that a total of six un
e'xcusedl absences be allowed, and
that seventy-five per cent at
tendance of classes be required
biefore' one is allowed to take a
final examination. More absences
in aither category should be sub
ject to dismissal from the course
-hbut without the grade "FA."
I N short, a student who cuts out
of a class is punishing him
self and his parents enough in
terms of dlelayedl academic prog
ress and wasted1 money. Juniors
and sen.iors in upper class
c'ourses shouldl be on voluntary
attendance as presently practiced
by the "II" arnd better students
What to do with the students
in academic probation is indeed
a problem but not -,e which
rannot be surmoun.ted. Instead
of limiting their absences, why
not treat them as any other stu
dlent. It is their redl wagon if
they cannot (10 pr-oper work and1
do not attend classes regularly.
Chances are they won't make it
on the "OuItsideC" either. Psy*
chiatric help is probably what
they need more than arbitrary