The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, October 18, 1963, Page Page Two, Image 2
Replies To I
To our surprise, we have come under
rather heavy attack this week over a resolu
tion we introduced in Student Senate and
subsequently endorsed on the editorial pages
of The Gamecock last week.
The proposed resolution, a motion to cen
sure the Methodist Wesley Foundation for
providing "living quarters and support" to
a field worker of the Student Non-Violent
Co-ordinating Committee, who brought "the
name of the University into bad favor in a
court of law," was the object of unfair
criticisms by many students of the "liberal"
school of thought.
Below, we'd like to reply to some of the
charges leveled against us and answer some
of the questions we have been asked con
cerning the resolution:
Why did you present the resolution? We
offered the resolution to Student Senate
because we felt Wesley Foundation had been
aiding a person who sought to disrupt the
otherwise peaceful integration of USC.
Knowing the record of the individual, Wes
ley, nonetheless, allowed him use of their
facilities. They finally asked him to leave,
but not because of the activities that in
volved the University and himself in a
court of law.
Do y1oU expect the bill to be passed by the
Senate? No. Familiar with the political na
ture of many student senators, we know
Senate will worm its way out of taking a
[THIE LI
daition was foundei
Wesley Foundation which a slight
Edito,' lpart couldi have
Editor
The Gamecock malicious fabricati
flea,'~~~ oIr AIe':0u attenmpted
Dearactivities at the r
It is my understanding that with the Communi
one of the more radical memhers is rather old-fashio
of student government, Dennis ing please try an(
Myers, has introduced in the In the not so e
Senate a resolution of censure you had different
against the Wesley Foundation, true that "a i
on the grounds that it accom- reaches the top t
modated an Atlanta Student while upon the very runl
he was aiding the Negro freedom Climbel?"
movement in Columbia. GABRIEL I
I am shocked that a USC stu
dent, deemed worthy of holding
the high position of Senator, Editor
would stoop so low as to attempt The Gamecock
to condemn God's Church for I)ar .1r. .11yers:
carrying out the teachings of ouI It is surprising
Master. The \Vesl'y Founltion il received by
did nothine contrary to the teach- which speaks out
ing of The lethodist Church or Last week, the n
the principles of Christian broth- the letter - writer
erhtool. I take pride at 1,eing a Bata seh. This le,
Methodist, and am offended that cices in guessin
such nonsense would )c" presented }hi ,1 4his ,n,vao
at an institution ini which I am 0)1 h esa
registered. VO
Yet, there is another issue in- Tefrtcoc
volved. Trhis is one of' the most Btrc sa g
basic of our principles of Amieri- hsegbyein
can dlemocracy - religious free- lritThseol
dom. One would expelct only ini ms biu,i
Soviet Russia, or ( uba, or Red lhursisaia
China to find a religious insti to- hgt 'i
tion being sub)jectedl to the wrath
andI harrassmnen t of governmeirt.
It simply is INAMERIC'AN for0
an agency of tIhe State, especially Eio
constituted student governmrent, 'l ;Iicc
to condemn the Chiu rch!o ir jI
WILLIAMI F. MED'ALINI .illket
Editor hw(a n
The Gameucock rsnaieo h
Dear Mr. .lyers:mripasaeol
Reading T'he Ga ,n cock has he- ( ('i '10i'h
conie a dlisgusting chore to at Itievdnth
least this student. toogl td
Anyone with the least percep- beoepitn t1
tion can realize that an editor is Mi.Si i'sae
anything but perfectly free in his FonainnTh
edIitorial policy. B ut, Ther (lame- aidSaordy
Cock has, ini miy e'stimation, farllen thnake o e
to little hut an adlvocaLtion of ad-. Wsly aeri
nministrativye policy.wsntaloe
The Gamecock, at this time, Yt.lewa e
can only he seen as a steppli ig ya noees
stone foir the pol itical amiitions dm'oth ur
of its editor. IPlease, M1r. 'Wyers, '''"
for the sake of the academic free- Itikta
(loim you (once advocated, say lnigWse i
somethriny!wacopelyir
IIARVEY G;OOLSBY wt are aa
Editor (( n('C a h
T he Ga mecockRIAD
Dear Mr. Mye'rs:
"They have eyes but don not0
see; they have e'ars but dIo not I'i(r
hear," wouldl aptly desc'rib)e your IeGmcc
answer to my letter of last week. err.Mr:
You c'omipletely miissed its uim- Itiha'tin
portance. 01'go dtrh
The issues were neither the tefret noi
syllabus nor the news, but rather igie hit
academic r ee d o mn and your irsan scli
"editorializing" of news reports. dnl 'toa 0
Under your d ir e c t i o n The wt ttieaia
Gamecock has, so far, indulged i ob omne
in double-talk, fence-sitting, and o hs raiai
sensationalism. But, last w e e k toscanivret
you out-did yourself -- this time tuhi;teyav
it was a witch-hunt. Your base- tief'c ino
lessattak onthe esle Fou- aetiviely t long.
Wesley, Etc.
stand. We presented the resolution, though
to bring the case before the Student Body
Did you offer the motion because the in
dividual, Samuel Shirer, was an integra
tionist? Of course, not! We would hav
offered a similar resolution had Shire]
caused the same amount of trouble and hac
happened to be a segregationist, a com
munist, or an American Nazi.
Can you prove all of the charges in your
resolution? If four affidavits are of an3
help, yes.
What is a censure motion? It is merely a
motion of repremand, or "an act of con.
demning as wrong" - according to Web.
ster's Dictionary.
Why don't you take definite editorial
stands? We are under the impression that
we are taking definite editorial stands,
Those that claim we are not are simply the
"you are wrong, I am right" crowd; when
we take a stand contrary to their views,
they accuse us of fence-sitting. These people
believe everything is either black or white;
they have an answer for everything-they
thrive on defending their "causes."
Several students have charged that you
presented the censure resolution simply to
aid your political future. What do they
mean? We think they refer to our secret
desire to become governor of Mississippi,
Dr, perhaps, to head a States' Rights ticket
for the presidency. -Myers
TTERS
I upon rumors Not that anything our good
fort on your editor might have said is to be
e x p o s e d as construed as anti-religious. Quite
:ns. the contrary. This student feels
to link the that perhaps the editor is fully
ligious center cognizant of the religious issues
st Party. This involved. We are happy to be
ned mud sling- blessed with news media that is
ther attack. completely in keeping with the
y distant past c h a r a c t e r of our wonderfully
views. It is democratic society.
t i o n once it As one Christian to another,
urns its back Mr. Myers, thank you for censur
,s by which it ing this misguided organization.
JOHN BRYAN
3ATARSEH
0 0 0
Editor
The Gamecock
Dear Mr. Myers:
In your editorial of Oct. 11,
the amount of you referred to the All-American
rhe Gamecock rating awarded The Gamecock by
Lgainst it. the Associated Collegiate Press;
ame of one of but, you failed to point out that
s was Gabriel the award was won last year be
Lves only two cause of definite editorial stands
y the motives and objective reporting.
ranted attack I am afraid that this year, the
er and upon editorials and reporting do not
is hatGabie come up to the excellent stand
sthtGbel ards of last year.
bist who swells You failed to take a definite
his name in s t a n d for the International
:hoice, and the Studies Department in its in
that Gabriel sistence on an objective study of
row - minded, communism.
ired) Furthermore, you have accused
J. C. K. a highly regarded religious and
* intellectual group, Wesley Foun
dation, of following the Gus Hall
communist "line of thought,"
simply because they are neither
reactionary nor narrow - minded.
dlisagree with Wesley Foundation is to be com
ut the Wesley mended for fostering an intel
lectual atmosphere in the midst
!sponsible rep- of so much parochialism and
tudlent govern- mental apathy.
ition to censor Mr. Editor, if anybody can be
accused of following a communist
Lt you did not line of thought, it is you, for you
the situation use their favorite techniques of
e news story. slander and news management.
at W e s I e y On your front-page you present
rsdlay, Friday, conspicuously news favorable to
~hts. He was your editorials.
.He returned Your private crusade against
the week but an independent and s o c i a I 1 y
to stay over. minded group will of necessity
omed at Wes- f o u n d e r against the rock of
would be. The liberty and freedom of thought,
hi is open to the American Constitution.
u r edlitorial MUHAMMAD SAH LI
hi communism * *
sponsible. Be- Editor
have to agree The Gamecock
seh's letter to Dear Mr. Myers:
week: "The Why has The Gamecock aban
nged from a doned its role as the bulkward of
llow sheet." progress at USC and reverted to
.TURNER spineless, pragmatic fence - sit
* ting? Has it capitulated to the
pressures of desparate tradition
alists, or has it, as many students
are now saying, fallen into the
hands of an editor concerned only
to note that with his political future?
s rise'n above EDGAR T. VAN BUREN
nalism of our
an organiza- 0 e 0
g for a pru- A A Syllabus
cy in dealingAB
irs. Mr. Myers Editor
The doctrine The Gamecock
mns pertaining Dear Mr. Myers:
is highly dis- May I compliment you on the
been a disrup- success with which you gave a
r civilization truly objective front page report
'Our Cam
' 1\
'Ah, Anoth
'PETE AN
Let's Take
A LL over South Carolina you
see the stickers on automo
bile bumpers . . . I M P E A C H
EARL WARREN. You may feel
this way.
If you believe that Earl War
ren, Chief Justice of the Su- I
preme Court of the United I
States, should be removed from
office "on impeachment for and J
conviction of treason, bribery or i
other high crimes and misde- I
meanors," as prescribed by the c
Constitution, you will have many 3
supporters in South Carolina, I
many supporters in other South- t
ern states, and some supporters q
in every state in the Union.
Never b e f o re has a chief t
justice been subjected to so much E
personal harassment. The John p
Birch Society, through its maga- t
zine American Opinion, solicits p
contributions to a fund for the b
impeachment of Earl Warren.
Many right - wing organizations c
and individuals have lent their a
support. No man since General e
Sherman has been more hated in
the South.
E ARL WARREN and the S
"Warren Court" have been P
blamed for their decisions in c<
three basic areas: communism, ti
integration, and religion. A book li
has been written entitled "Nine
Men Against America -- The si
Story of the U. S. Supreme lp
Court," which contends that ni
America has been betrayed by V
Earl Warren and his "hench.. a
men." c
P r es id ent Eisenhower ap - t
pointed Earl Warren Chief Jus- ]
tice in 1953. Prior to that, War- ]
ren had served three consecutive
terms as governor of California, C
where he had achieved the dis- '1
tinction of becoming the guberna- v
torial nominee of both the Re- a
publican and Democratic parties.
In 1948, Governor Warren had p
been the Republican vice-presi- f
dental candidate on the ticket h1
headed by Governor Dewey of t
New York.
With his broad political back- p
ground, Earl Warren found him- E
self immediately in the national I
CROWING FORl A
UNIVERSITY OF SO
Member of Associaged
Founde.d January 30, 1908, with II<
Editor. "The Ga'm.co,ck 'is published
University of South Carolina weekly,
year except on holidays andl during es
The opinions espressed by coluimr
necessarily those of "The Caamecock.
Letters to the Editor. but all L.etters a
not constitute an endorsement. The
publication any letter is reserved.
EDITOR .................
MANAGING EDITOR.
ASSOCIATE EDITOR.
BUSINESS MANAGER
News Editor ...
Sports Editor. .. .......
Society Editor. .. .....
Feature Editor. .. .......
Campus Editor. .. .......
Chief Photographer......
Advertising Manager ......
Circulation Manager ....
Exchange Editor .. ........
Art Editor..
COLUMNISTS: Todd Wilson, Dave
Andrews, Ted Narrow.
PHOTOGRA PhERS:n Ralph Jarre.l
pus Cops'
H
er Ticket'
DREWS g ?m.
A Stand
potlight when he became Chief
fustice. The Supreme Court was
raced with many difficult deci
ions. By refusing to rule on
ome issues, and standing firmly
m precedent on others, the "War
en Court" was expected to deftly
Lvoid arousing controversy.
XACTLY the opposite hap
pened. The Supreme Court,
inder the leadership of Earl
Varren, went on to rule on those
ontroversial issues. Within a
ear racial segregation in the
ublic schools was ruled con
rary to the meaning of the 14th
mendment. The rest is history.
It is universally accepted that
he Constitution of the United
tates outlines a form of re
ublican government embodying
he principle of separation of
owers with built-in checks and
alances.
Executive, legislative and judi
ial powers are clearly defined,
nd are intended to be on an
:iual basis.
The Constitution states that
The judicial power of the United
tates shall be vested in one Su
reme Court, and in such inferior
>urts as the Congress may from
me to time ordain and estab
As Omar Khayyam, the Per'
an mathematician and philoso
her, so bluntly put it: "The
toying finger writes, and having
!rit moves on, nor all your piety
nd wvit shall lure it back to
aincel half a line, nor all your
aars wvash out one word of it." ~
'F Earl Warren were impeached t
-today it would not change the
ulings made by the "Warren
ourt" in the years since 1953. t
'hat must be done by the courts, 1
rith the Supreme Court the final
rbiter, or by an act of Congress.
The money in the fund to im
each Earl Warren might there
are be better employed in the
iring of eloquent legal counsel t
>represent the views of those
rho disagree with recent Su
reme Court decisions. For the
upreme Court is the law of the
md, whether we like it or not.
T
C
CREATER
[Jil CA ROLINA s
Collegiate Presse
bert F.lliott Conzales as the first 0
by andi for the students cf thec
on Fridays, during the college
aminations.
ists And letter writers are not
'"The Gamecock" encourages
nnste be signe.d. Publishin g does
right to edit or withhold from c
* ..DENNIS MYERS *
DAVE BLEDSOE
DONNA RUSSELL s
EMILY REDDING a
*. .Regina Galgano g
Mike McCarthy a
Connie Wall r
...........Pat Roesse.
Mary Carlton O'Neal t
...Bill Campbell a
Larry Barrett b
b
........ ... hela Reardon
.......Nellie Merryman Ik
Joan K. Roberts t
Henry, Carl IIendricks, Pete
Is, Dave Undiewoo.,8
TODD
I N continuation of what we
were discussing last week, I
should like to mention several
other changes for our present
Student Government organiza
tion. I re-emphasize that these
statements are not already defi
nite and are open to criticism
and suggestion. They merely
represent several of my ideas on
the subject.
One of the basic changes that
urgently needs change is the
separation of the executive and
legislative branches of govern
ment. At present, it is practically
impossible for the Student Body
president to preside over and
lead the Senate, in addition to
keeping the executive commit
tees of Senate functioning as
they should. These committees,
if properly functioning, take a
tremendous amount of time, and
the Senate, as well, takes up a
considerable amount of time.
Should the two be separate, the
Student Body president could de
vote his time to the executive
tlivision. This would also give
the vice president a more im
portant role to fulfill.
A NOTIIER possibility is the
removal of Student Union
rrom the auspices of Student
Sovernment. In so doing, there
would be one over-all chairman
)f the Student Union with the
Dance Committee, Movie Com
nittee, Activities Committee,
?tc., being sub - committees, al
owing a more uniform program
>f activities. There would be one
Carl He
Sale Of Wheat
To Soviet Unioi
Seems Benefici;
W HY is the United States be
ing asked and seriously
onsidlering selling wheat to the
tussians this year?
First of all, Russia is going
o have another bad grain har
rest, thus making it several years
ince the Soviet Union has had
good harvest. Second, the
~heat farmers of the mid-wvest
rn United States rejected Presi
ent Kennedy's system of con
rols and will be forced to sell
heir wheat on the world market,
t possibly low prices.
In short, these farmers need
o sell all the wheat they possi
ly can.
SS we see it, here is a country
with a great amount of
theat and another country with
ut this wheat (which needls it).
Ve cannot see a good reason for
he two countries not getting to
-ether and completing a legiti
nate business deal. We do insist,
owevei, that the Russians pay
or their wvheat purchases in
ash, and at the wvorld market
rice. We (do not consider wheat
n the same scale as weapons,
teel, or other strategic mnateri
Is, with which the Soviet Union
[)uld wvage war against us.
A business deal with the Rus
ians couldl have beneficial re
ults. In the long run, the Soviet
Tnion couldl become dlependent
n the United States for agri
ultural products, and this in
urn could lead to other areas of
radle. WVe feel that nations
'hich are economically indepen
ent (do not engage in war with
nch other. F'urther, an increas
ig interdlependence would lead
a rap)id dlecrease in worldl ten
on. And, the ideological prop
ganda put out by the Soviet
overnment to the Soviet people
ouldl have a far lesser effect
home and abroadl.
U lE Soviet Union in recent
years has shown an increas
ig inability to produce satisfac
ry agricultural harvests. The
verage consumer in Russia has
en forced to do without sonme
asic essentials, which we take
r granted. Khrushchev nio
nger feels that he can ignore
e demand for consumer items
d continue production of heavy
dustrial g(ods. In short, the
>viet peasant is proud of the
>ectacular ncom.lism ~ in
NILSON
Governmental,
Student Union
Changes Needed
main coordinating body if such
were the case. In addition, Stu
dent Union would actually have
access to more diversion of
funds should it be necessary.
Most schools have the separate
Student Union with a tremen
dous number of various activi
ties. We have a great deal of
room for improvement in con
nection with our Student Union.
Next week we may possibly
mention several other issues for
consideration, but I would like
to devote this last paragraph to
the upcoming elections which
will be held Tuesday.
T HE freshman class has shown
quite a bit of interest in
the various offices and I should
like to wish each of them the
best of luck. Since we are at
tempting to strengthen Student
Government this year, I would
encourage the members of that
class to be particularly careful
in the selection of their repre
sentatives. These representatives
will be responsible to the mem
hers of the class and to their
various organizations, but will
have an even greater responsi
bility to the University as a
whole. I urge that those elected
remember this after their elec
tion.
Perhaps the most important
election, however, is the election
of the student member of the
Faculty Disciplinary Committee.
All students are urged to con
scientiously cast their ballot in
this respect. The year is young,
and we still have a lot to do.
,ndricks
the realm of space technology;
but, he wants more meat, eggs,
butter, and milk on the table,
and he is inclined less and less
to accept the failures wvhich the
communist system has brought.
Our huge surpluses of grain
and other p)roducts every year
clearly indlicate that the free
enterprise system has powerful
adlvantages over the communist
sys5temi. Amneric'an farmers have
initiative, and for thme most part,
the collectivized farms in Russia
do not display such an enthusi
asm for production.
P ERSONALJ motivation is the
reason for the disparity -
American farmers standl to gain
and lose more, per harvest. And,
there is a certain p)ride in own
ership of property which the so
cialists and communists fail to
understand; but, it is a basic
economic force, and it is one
which they will have to learn if
they are to succeed economically.
We feel that Khrushchev, in
buying foreign wheat, has made
a tacit adlmission that the comn- _
munist system is in need of,
S e r i o u s repair. His "had
weather" alibi cannot be taken
se'riously, for lUussia is a large
country andl the weather cannot
he uniformly bad all over the
country --the answer is deepJ in
the system of government itself.
A N argument, against the sale
of wheat to the llussians,
just because they are lUussians,
isn't valid - considering the
other factors. Perhap)s K hrush
chev is "bhuying~ time'' in his dis
p)ute with the Chinese, hut at
least he is buying it with money
---andl the money is going into
our pocket.
The Gamecock Is intended
primarily as a v'oice for stu
dlent opinmon andl news, We
welcome letters from any
student or mlember of the
laculty under the following
provisions,
i.etters must be sIgned
with the writer's mailing ad
dress. We will withho)ld the
write.r H name if the letter
requests it. hlowever, we
will print no letter that Is
unsinnd.