The gamecock. (Columbia, S.C.) 1908-2006, September 25, 1919, Page 4, Image 4
r1jg ( amercock
UNivERsIrTY of SOUiTH CAROLINA
PUBLISHED WEEKLY BY THE LITERARY
SOCIETIES. TERMS $1.50 A YEAR.
Entered at Columbia S. C. pogtoflice
November 20, 1908 as second class
mail matter.
Columbia, S. C., Sept 25, 1919
R. C. Thompson, Editor-in-Chief
J. R. Bryson, Business Manager
L. N. Connor, Asst. Business Manager
"Pep" is the keynote of suc
cess. Get PEP.
Why can't we have an or
chestra and glee club?
How strange it is that all the
mistakes in a girl's letter are
due to the.eight or ten in the
room!
"What's the world coming
to?" asked Rupert Hughes.
Coming to its senses pretty
soon, we hope.
Our Leader
The new president of the
University student body is a
man well deserving of the
honor placed upon him. Ad
judged the best football
player, the best baseball
player, the best orator, the
best all round college man
that's Seaborn. Giving his aft
ernoons to the college teams,
studying at night to make dou
ble stars and taking time dur
ing it all to represent the Uni
versity in oratorical contests.
An active Y. M. C. A. and liter
ary society worker, a man of
striking personality and ability
as a leader. We know of no
student who could better grace
the office of a student president
than Seaborn. Stick by him
and watch Carolina go.
Sunstroke
It is claimed that one afflict
ed with this malady loses all
consciousness and motive pow
er. Said pitiable person is thus
placed in a peculiar plight
(pardon our use of allitera
tion). Sometimes the effect is
overcome, and the converse is
also true. To be plain, how
ever, he is a dead weight to
himself and to his associates
while in this condition. It's un
fortunate that he was struck
perhaps it could have been pre
vented, but suppositions are not
in order ; a remedy must be
found for the existing condi
tion.
Many college men suffer
from sunstroke--not the usual
kind, but one that renders
them just as helpless ar.d
makes them greater burdens
upon their associates. The
blinding glare of the public
limelight has caught many off
their guard and has struck
them beyond a point of recov
ery. Students as a rule think
more of the honor attached to
an office when they accept it
than of the college spirit and
sacrifice necessary to its suc
cessful completion. Conse
quently, we have men grabbing
for every available honor,
thinking that they can be great
without serving. And they find
too late that "he who would be
first shall be last." Their mo
tive is sometimes selfish, and
sometimes born out of the de
sire to help the college, but
very seldom do we find a loyal
student who will not limit him
self to only what he can do.
College offices must be
filled, college honors must be
bestowed-it is only fair to the
whole college that this be done
in the best way. The best way
is to limit the man who won't
limit himself. A man who will
attempt to edit two publica
tions at the same time, either
fails to realize his inability
from 'the standpoint 'of the
greatest good or else holds the
honor higher than the correct
performance of the duty of an
editor. We say with all earn
estness and with the good of
the college at heart, that no
man can at the same time suc
cessfully publish two publica
tions at the University. Nor
can any one manage two athlet
ic teams at once. We believe
this is a reasonable conclusion,
and refer you to any college
editor if you doubt it. Our
conclusion not only holds good
of publications and athletic
teams-it includes every phase
of college life. With a student
body of four hundred and fifty,
we can find a competent man
for every activity and still have
a surplus left. Loyal students
will not accept more honors
than they can successfully
grace.
An ounce of prevention is a
good way to start. A student
who insists on remaining in the
light longer than he ought to
should be protected by the stu
dent body. He's weak and
needs help.
Prevent sunstroke - that's
the best remedy. Avoid having
"dead" weights--they pull us
down.
Upon seeing Buchanan and
"Shorty" Sifford together one is
reminded of the photographs
that accompany the advertis
ing of a well known .*health
building remedy : ''Before and
after taking."
Has It No Friehd?
At the commencements of
Princeton and Yale, as well as
those of most of the colleges
and universities in the Eastern
States, "wet goods" were in
evidence, though that' is not
saying that any alumnus or stu
dent had more aboard than he
could conveniently and com
fortably carry. As it was the
last commencement before na
tional prohibition is to set in,
the "'oys" old and young,
"celebrated" and much more
has been said of heir merriment
than usual, over-indulgence in
strong potations having long
-ago gone out of fashion among
educated men.
Now, conceding that the
drinking of whiskey, wine or
beer, is useless, unhealthy,
wasteful, that their consump
tion is and of right ought to be
abolished, we summon all of
our courage not yet oozed to
inquire:
Does or not the prohibition
of alcoholic beverages condemn
a part of the American people
to a loss of enjoyment, of pleas
urable excitment?
Mark, we have not said a
"net" loss. We have not asked
whether or not the loss will be
offset by the gain.
Is there no good, at any time,
in any ctrcumstances, upon any
conceivable occasion, in a mint
julip ?
We put the question for that,
in all the rancorous and tumul
tuous discussion of ribald years,
in which some of the ribaldry
has been as dry as dust, no one
has had the temerity, so far as
we have observed, to ask it.
Why have the champions of
"the drink" been ever apologe
tic, ever indirect, ever squeam
ish, defending it only under
their hats with a whispered tale
of a glorious jamboree or of a
moderately jubilant fishing
trip?
Not even has the suggestion
been made that a monument or
a series of memorials be erected
to the honor of- the "Manhat
tan cocktail" in Broadway,
when that definitive institution
shall have departed, as in a few
days it must-and leave not a
smell behind.
Shall neither "storied urn
nor animated bust" commemo
rate the vanished glories?
The State.
Bible At The University.
Greenville Piedmont.
Not many weeks ago Colum
bia University announced that
hereafter the Bible will have
place in its curriculum. Now
comes the University of South
Carolina, which has ceated a
special professorship for the
teaching of the Bible. This is
not an innovation, but a revival,
for a course in the Bible was
given at the University up un
til 1873 when the institution
was closed because of condi
tions which existed in the Re
!construction era. The chair was
'first established at the South
Carolina College, now the
University, in 1835, because of
the heretical views of a former
president, Mr. Thomas Cooper,
who had secured his position
through the good graces of
Thomas Jefferson. William
Capers, afterward a great
Methodist bishop, was the first
occupant. The next was the
Rev. Stephen Elliott of Beau
fort. The institution's greatest
professor of Sacred Literature
and Christian evidences was
Dr. James H. - Thornwell, aft
erward president of the college
one of the commanding person
alities in its long history. The
last to fill the chair was Prof.
J. L. Reynolds, who served
from 1865 to 1873.
The Bible should have its
place in the university curri
culum. It is the foundation of
our system of ethics and moral
philosophy. It holds fi"st place
in literature and yet in many
State colleges is omitted in the
literary course. It is the corner
stone of jurisprudence. Daniel
Webster said in his oration at
the dedication of the Bunker
Hill monument: "The Bible is
a book of faith, and a book' of
doctrine, and a book of morals,
and a book of religion, of spe
cial' revelation from God; but
it is also a book which teaches
man his own individual respon
sibility, his own dignity and his
equality with his fellow man."
Yet many a young man has re
ceived his diploma in this State
who was unfamiliar with the
Book of Books and remains ig
norant to this day of its suprem
acy and sublimity.
Those in authority at the Uni
versity display not only wisdom
but farsightedness also in re
storing the Bible to its former
position in the course of stud
ies.
Be on the bleachers Satur
day and yell till you can't
then some.
Some one called number 21
last night and asked for Buck
anan.
"Can't get him now, he's
locked up," came over the wire.
Perhaps this acounts for his
continued absence from the
campus.
When's the Annual coming
lout?