The Fairfield news and herald. (Winnsboro, S.C.) 1881-1900, November 11, 1891, Image 2
fr.
* TIIK
NEWS AND HERALD.
PUBLISHED EVERY WEDNESDAY
?BY?
iNewo - and - Herald - Co. |
W. 9. UOl'GLVSS, ^
> Editors.
AS. DAVIS, ^
TKUM-i, I "A ADVASCK :
1 car. .... SI.JO
Six Month*. - - - - .75
Y
WINNSBORO, S. C.
Wednesday, November II. : : 1391 j
THE EVENT OF EVENTS. .
THE INSTITUTE SURPASSES ANYTHING
OF THE KIND KVEll HELD
IN t AIRFIELD.
The Larj;c Crowd Look With Pleasure and i
Wonder?What ivas There--What was
Done--Who Had Kxhibits and Wlio (lot
the I'rttniums.
One*, more the Fanners' Institute
held under the auspices of the F*irlield
Agricultural Society lias cctne
aud g'one. Once more is the Society,
the county and the exhibitors to le
congratulated upon the creditable display
aud theachiertment and advancement
of an undertaking, which but
tour years ago. was a cruue cmorjw.
From a modest little collection of the
products of tiie countv in the Court !
IIou<e f.ur\e?rs ag? Has developed
an exposition ??f the valuable resources
of the county, representative of the
tiiiilt, energy Mid progress of her people.
more ?ii antic in its display than
the most bswildered dreamer and enthusiast
in i he iti'irt could hare pictured
in his imagination. Each }ear
since the custotu of holding these Institutes
was begun, h:is found it larger
and more fxteusive in its exhibition^
and its exhibitors and visitors mote
numerous. It is now the great testive
occasion of onr people when they
flock in from all pan? of the county
and vie and compete with each other I
in their artistic, domestic, *cieutific,
industrial, mechanical and agricultural
skill. It is their own fair and burns I
anew a pride in their county and
kindles a hope for greater possibilities
for its development, seeing tne re.
-- makable quantity and quality and
variety of the products that can by
intelligent efforts be produced right
here in Fairfield, ther look upon it
with irladness of hesrt, and go home
more hopeful of the future.
"This is splendid." "I had no idea
Fairfield could get up such a thing,"
" This is the first one I have seen, but I
didn't know it wa? such a big thing as
this," were the kinds of remarks that
fell from hunch ecU of lips. Ye?,
Fairfield can, and the magnificent display
or. the 3rd and 4th inst. proves
conclusively, unequivocally aad very
practically that a great many tilings
can be done ia Fairfield that a great
many people don't believe The Institute
is a great object lesson to all
our despondent and despairing people. ;
The many kind* of things that have
been dene or grown or developed
under the hands of the men, women
^ and even the children, and placed as a |
great picture gallery in the Armory I
and thereabouts, are striking and forcible
lessons that, which intelligent,
systematic, faithful, hard work and
perseverance our people can live at
home; and that well too.
Early Monday evening I he several
energetic and hard working committees
were busy arranging everything,
and they deserve the compliments
from the Society for the taste displayed
and their indefatigable energy. The
Armory wa3 a grand scene. The
beautiful works of art done by fair
hands gave the hall an attractiveness
that made the one eud of the hall appear
in all of its splendor; and the less
ornamental products ?f the farm at
the other end and along either side
gave food for thought for those who
enjoy the beauty that iies in the necessities
of common life, while iu the
centre were the household exhibits ?f
every kind; wines, jellies with their
variegated shade* of color were beauti
??-ftitTcrthe eye, and with the substantial
such a* ham?, bread, etc., made
many wi?h that they could be permitted
to use not the sense of sight
only. Both Tuesday and Wednesday
the streets and everywhere were
thronged frith people. Exch man,
woman aiiu cluui smowcu mat nicy
were proud ot what was being done.
The merry laughter of trie children,
and they were plentiful, augmented
the pleasure of ike days. They were
srreatdaysfor Fairfield County. Everybody
seemed to feel it; the crowing
cock felt it and said so; the prancing
colt showed it; bellowing cow said
she thought so too; the cackling ducks,
geese ami the gobbling gobble all
joined in th-s c'aorus, and even the
f grunting hog grunted ?ut assent and
appro *! to what ail others said. The
patent medicine man, the side show
man all found it a great affair?e?pecially
for thtm. Fanners enjoyed it,
doctors left their patients for a time to
see it, lawyers threw down their law
bocks to watch what was going on,
merchants slipped out when tney could
so manr wislnm^ra. fho criria nnt3
boys couldn't be h<ild at school, the
housekeeper? left home and left their
husbands to get their dinners as be>t
they could. It was a season of privilege?,
a holiday occasion. Indeed it
was a unification for Fairfield. AH
politics, prejudices, troubles, cares
and anything to mar the pleatures of
the day were locked up in the closet at
home.
HOUSEHOLD ARTICLES.
Too uiuch can scarcely be said in
praise of this most interesting deeirtinent.
Of course some things were
a little better than others, but they
were all exceedingly good. The most
attractive of the exhibits in this line
was probably th.t of Mrs. M. H.
Mobley, who had taken great pains in
the arrangement of the numerous, jars
of preserves and decanters of wine and
succeeded in making a most creditable
display.
Mr*. T. L. Johnston, Mrs. T. W.
I
IIhwIs, Mrs. T. Harden, Mrs. If. Y.I
Milling arc the ladies who hail the j s
lullest exhibits.
The following is ?. list of the exhibits I
and the namea of the exhibitors:
Mrs. T. L. Johnson, loaf ot bread, ;
butter, and various Yarities of jellies, j
preserves, pickles, wiues, and canned !
i'ruits.
Mrs. F. A. Neil, six kinds of jelly. (
preserve*.
Mis. \V. li. Dotv, k'v varieties of '
jallv. ' j
Mrs. H. Y. Millirg, several different :,
kinds of wine, jolly, j?re>t rve*, pickles, j ]
al>o canned fruits and vegetables. j J
con Lnruwt ^Yh)M?2 [
A I'lS WttS? VUC V/A Uiv Itll^vn v^u?K/.vs/. I
Mis. T. Harden, canned iruits and j
vegetables, preserve8, pickles and |
jellies.
Mrs. 5. R. Rutland, different, ra- (
rieties of preserves and jelly, pickles.
Mrs. T. \V. Rawl?, jelly, preserves,
pickles, lard, butter, ham (tiouio cured),
bread, two varieties dried fruit, eg^s,
winter apples.
F. A. Neil, preserves, pickles, bread,
two kinds of wine, butter.
I Mrs. Jas. M. Smith, pickles, preserves, j
W. J. Keller, pickles, canned fruit,
apples.
Mrs. Jno. M. Smith, pickles, several
kinds of wine, lard, apples and eight
varifies dried fruit.
Mrs. M. M. Huey, pickles.
Mrs. D. J. Macaulay, preserves.
Mrs. C. E. Cathcart, canned fruit.
Mrs. S. II. McCants, blackberry and
Madeira wine.
Mrs. G. H. McMaster, t\v? kinds of
wine, canncd tomatoes.
Mrs. James Richmond, three varities j
of wine, butter.
Mi.^ Ttirtc two iHrtrrent!
j wines.
Jno. Isenhower, six varieties of |
I dried fruit, and very line winter apples, j
j Mrs. T. Harden, several kinds of;
j dried fruits, butter.
Mrs. J. Cat heart, Jr., butter.
| F. E. Propst, butter.
I). Moblev, butter.
Sainl. Cathcart, Sr , butter.
Miss F. 1*. Dwight, loaf of breid.
Mrs. U.K. Ellison, home cured ham, I
bread.
Miss Anna MeCants, two loaves of j
bread.
Mrs. G. I>. Dunn, loaf of bread.
Mr*. F. Elder, loaf bread, butter.
II Y. Turner, fine winter apples. j
Mrs. II. R. Komedy, nice lot of j
apples.
Mrs. M. il. Moblev, a very line ex-;
hibit of wines, preserves, jellies, i
pickles.
I'OLLTKY AND l'KTS.
The exhibit in this department was j
most creditable, in fact we can lion- j
estly say that we have never seen at
any exhibition of a similar character,
finer fowls.
The following are the names of the
exhibitors, followed by tha articles
entered by each.
Mrs. W. 13. Murray, white Holland
turkeys.
J. F. Mc VIaster, black Langshaus,
Plymouth Rocks, coep of fancy pigeons.
Airs. T. Harden, group of white
Leghorns.
Eber Iiabb, pair Langslians, P'v- |
mouth Rocks, Light Brahmas.
H. B. Refo, fine pair bronze turkeys, j
pet fawn.
Mrs. K. W. Featherston, pair bronze :
turkeys.
W. M. Cathcart, English rabbits.
Thos. Anderson, pair white Holland
turkeys.
W. C. Beaty, trio Langshans.
G. I>. Dunn, trio Plymouth Ilocks. !
D. J. Macau lay, pair Muscovy ducks.
II. E. Ellison, Pekin ducks.
Willie Gilbert, English rabbit?.
P. S. Moblev, pair Ebden geese,
Muscovy ducks.
M. H. Mobley, brown Leghorns and !
game chickens.;
Pev. K. II. Jones, coop of buft*!
cochins.
Mrs. E. M. Turner, coop brawn j
Leghorns.
J. M. Lemmon, trio brown Leghorns, j
M. M. Kucy, pair Plymouth Pocks, j
L. Laudecker, coop game bantams.
K. Y. Turner, coop bantams.
D. Egleston, coop of game chickens. i
W. D. AY'vlie, two coops fine game
chickens.
F. E. Propst, Plymouth Pock chickens,
geese.
Miss Maggie Thompson, trio Plymeuth
Pocks.
FIELD CROPS AND GARDEN PRODUCTS. j
This department was very complete, !
and the articles exhibited very fimr.
- J. M. Stewart, sheaf oats, six stalks j
corn, bushel bread corn.
W. A. Neil, sheaf oats, bushel rustproof
oats, bushel bread corn, bushel
red oeas. one gallon sorjrhum, six
stalks sugar cane, bread corn, several j
kinds of pea?.
John D. Llarruon, fine second crop j
oat?.
W. R. Doty, display of harness and
saddles.
F. J. Smith, turnips.
T. L.Johnson, bushel each of sweet
potatoes, Irish potatoes, speckled,
black, white, farmer's friend,' lady,
whippoowill, red stock, T. L. J.'sprid
and cow peas.
J. H. Neil, sheaf oats.
W. It. Rabb, fire sheaf oats.
T. G. Uobeatson, sfeeaf oats, bread
corn, bushel potatoes.
G. II. Mcivlas.er exhibited fine cluster
braad fruit fr mi his Florida place
fine tomatoes, orange*.
T. W. Hawls, bushel each ru3t-proof j
oats, May wheat, six stalks corn, bread i
corn, collection garden vegetable?, I
sweet potatoes, turnips.
W. M. Patrick, bushel wheat.
11. A. Patrick, bushel wheat.
.T. A. Douglass, bushel rust proof
oats, bread corn, feed corn.
J. H. Neil, rust-proof oats.
W. D. Dafis, rust-proof oats.
F. A. Neil, bushel rust-proot oats,
six stalks com, bread corn, pumpkin.
J. W. Bankhead, bread corn.
II. S. Wylie, six stalks corn, bread
corn.
11. L. Mobley, six stalks field corn,
bread corn.
F. B. Austin, six stalks corn, yellow j
six stalks white corn, feed corn.
C. S. Ford, white bread corn.
S. H.Terrace, feed corn, pumpkins. {
1J. G. Tennant, bushel tnixe-i peas, i
11. E. Ellison, cabbages and pepper.!
Mrs. II. A. Gaillard, collection I
garden products.
M. M. Iluey, collection of garden j
vegetable?, very liue, turnips.
F. Elder, bushel sweet potatoes, j
sorghum and sugar cand.
J. \V. Wvlie. bushel sweet potatoe*. |
W. I). Murray, bushel Irish potitoss. !
J. G. Johnson, bushel Irish potatoes !
svrghuui and sugarcane.
J. Ii). Harrison, turnips.
G. II. MoM aster, bushel sweet pota- j
toes. ' <
11 Y. Turner, 02 pound pumpkin, j
Iri-h potatoes, sweet potatoes. ' i
J. E. Cat heart, bushel sweet potatoes.
T. W. Robertson, sweet potatoes. I
sorghum and stalks of cane.
W. U. T?abb, sweet potatoes.
F. M. Gadsdeu. iweet potatoes. J
sorghum and sugar cane, turnips.
F. A. Neil, sweet potatoes.
S. II. Rutland, sweet potatoes.
F. J. Smith, turnips.
Jno. Isenhower, collection of garden. <
vegetables.
W. A. Neil. gallon ?f sorghum 1 .
sugar cane.
Messrs. T. W. Kawls, F. A. Neil, J
\V. S. Weir. Jno. Isenhower had bales , \
of cotton on exhibition.
Messrs. II. S. Wvlie. F. A. Neil, j
J. P. Harrison, T. W. Robertson ex- j)
hibited very line liar.
Messrs. F. A. Neil, Ii. L. Moblev, 11
T. W. Eawls aud W. A. Neil exhib- j
ite;l tine specimens of stalk cotton- ' c
i
M. II. M->b!<-r exhibited some fine
5t;ilk c 'Hon.
MI-SCKI.r.AXklOL'S.
Winnsboro Drug Store tastily arranged
exhibit of toiler artieles.'lamps,
?te.
Q. D. "Williford & Co.. beautiful
;ase of millinery articles, very showy.
Macaulay & Turner, elegant exhibit
A tine shoes, slippers', etc.
J. (>. lioag, organs, Standard Sew-:
ing Machine Co. exhibited a sewing
machine, on which the agent showed
some beautiful sample- of its work, i
and doing for the visitors all kinds of
exquisite fancy work.
White Oak Cannery, a most credi-;
table display of their canned fruits I
and vegetables of every kind.
Ladies'Canning Factory, a splendid !
display of the canned goods of our j
new enterprise.
Ketchin & Cathoart, Franklin store j
mude by the Richmond Store Co.
Mr. \V. A. Neil exhibited * po-jket j
bo >k 140 year* old, mads by Hugh
Neil in 17.02; an oid ba<!ge worn i?y i
slaves in Charleston many years aiO.
Av rv itiiercsiiiig ex!:ibitiht? was. l-'INE
ART AND FANCY WORK.
This department was of course the j
center of attraction for the ladies, but
the display was ?so magnificent that it:
could not but attract the attention of!
the most indifferent observer.
Mrs. li. II. Jones, crocheted afghan. J
Tirzah Ketchin. aged twelve years, j
pretty bed spread and pillow shams, j
rugs made from bagging; a very credi- i
table display for one so young.
II. M. Ketchin, robe trimmed with i
antique crocheted lace.
Lottie IJlair aged twelve years.!
beautiful worsted crazy quilt.
Mrs. Mary C. Rion, crocheted win-;
r>)in of the best of the I
,lv" ? - exhibits.
Miss Marion McMaster, beautiful j
rugs made from bagging.
Standard Sewing Machine Co., elegant
display of fancy machine work, i
Mrs. F. VV. Ilaberuicht, a boy's suit i
of clothes made by herself, and spleu-'
didly done, too.
Miss Eunice Connor, large collection ;
of embroidery and various kinds of
fancy work.
Miss Mallie McMaster. embroidered
skirt.
Mrs. S. S. Gibson, collection of
crocheted and knitted lace, one of the j
most exquisite of the exhibits, showing ;
seventeen paterns.
.Mrs. F. E.Propst, table mats made i
from wadding.
.Miss Floride Dwighi, one half dozen
drawn work, linger bowl doylies, very
pretty indeed.
Misses Marie and Jennie IJeaty, sewing
and outJine embroidery.
Miss Kate Lord, beautiful jewelry
cu-ket.
Mrh. V. A. Robinson, beautifully
embroidered table scarf.
Mrs. D. J. Macaulay, embroidered
tirrt creen.
Miss Genie Anderson a^ed twelve
j ears pretty outline embroidered bed
spread.
Miss Maggie Elder, robe t!e :.i.it;
iriintn -d with crocheted 1?cj.
M:ss Ella Doty lovely slipper ba^.
Mr*. U?*n. G. Pratt, mushroum >iti<t J
front, Miineihingvery novel an<l prrnv. j
Mr>. T. Harden, beautiiu p n-1
cu-hion.
0 ie of the most unique anl ir-j
mavkable pieces of work in this tie-!
partment was a tlol 1 made entirely = ! |
shucks, by Mrs. Mary/C. lli-'n; ii i
attracted a great deal of atteiri?>?..
Mis^ Mamie IJriliek. a Jarc*' cJ.rction i
ofcray?n d: a a um-M>g which aj
number of studio f:<m mwnre were
to be seen, ail of which were beautifully
executed.
Miss .X-tunie Cummi: gs. a number
ofexqviisilu picces of crayon drawing,
cachone of which was most skillfully
executed.
Miss Hanna Riou, number of mo?t
beautiful i il paintings. Ka?:!* piece
exhibited remarkable skill in execution.
Rev. It. 11. J?ncs four oil painted
studies from nature uiakimr an exquisite
sli')W.
Mrs .F. M. Clarke, crazyexquisite quilt.
Miss Lizzie Gerig, lovely erazv
quilt.
Miss Enuice Connor also had exhibited
a beautilai quilt.
Mr?. R. II. Jones, beautiful cruzy
quilt.
Mrs. T. G. Robertson, patch work
quilt.
Mrs. II. F.Gib.on,beautiful lamberquin.
Mrs. T. M. B. Holley, very pretty
rag rug.
Mrs. J. S. Cathcart, Jr., lovely
ftificial bowers made- of worsted
zephyr.
Miss Mamie Bolick cabinet ol fancy
w*rk of different varieties.
Mie# Ella Doty had on exhibition a
be.ir.tiiu! hag made of silk illu-d>n,
fiiled with silk weed from Kentucky.
.Mrs. Raw is, Mrs. \V. R. Doty, and
Mrs. Kotnedy had beautiful collections
of chrysanthemums.
Mrs. II. A. Gaillard, collection of
chrysanthemu
Mrs. W. 13. Murray, a line collection
ot pot plants.
Miss Mary Ilinnar.t, a branch of a
tree with three very natural paper
own perched uuon it.
IIOCS. SHEK1* AND CATTI.K.
rVn unusually large number of line
cows, sheep and liojrs were exhibited
in this department.
The following is a list, as nearly as
we could get it,. of the exhibitors and
exhibits:
John Stewart, graded Guernsey bull.
T. L. Johnston, graded Jersey bull.
F. Elder, herd of full Jersey cattle.
M. 11. Moblev, graded Jersey heifer.
F. E. Prepst, graded Jerseys*
It. E. Ellison, two Avreshirc milch
cows.
S. B. Cathcart. Sr., herd of Ayreshires.
Dr. T. B. Madden, graded Jersey
milch cows.
T. II. Kitchen, pair graded Jersey !
heifers.
F. A. Neil, milch cow and bull.
J. M. Galloway, one Jersey bull.
Geo. B. Gibson, Berkshire hogs.
S. B. Cathcart, Sr., Berkshire sow.
LI. E. Ketchin, Berkshire hogs.
Hillard AVylie, Berkshire sow and '
bit?d.
Hugh S. Wylie, Berkshire boar.
F. M. Gadsden, Essex and Berkshire i
pigs. ' |
F. Elder, Berkshire sow and breed, j
M. II. Moblev, E-aOx bear and pigs, i
S. II. Terrace, Southdown sheep. '
T. L. Johnston, pen of sheen.
M. II. Mobley. Cotswohl sheep.
H0K3KS AND MI LK 5.
J. if. Stewart, one :i:*ci two yen* oI:i i
;?li*.
\V, B Dixon, brood maie -41111 colt !
tickling coir, one yea 1* oi<I c??lt.
'I'. W. linwl.-j, one u*ar old c??it.
il. \V. (fil).son, one Year old ?r??l:.
.J. A. |)on^l;i.->, : w<> \cur ?iti coll.
Ford, iouIc culi.- under o yeais. !
U. A. MoMtekin, stallion
J. L. Lemon, stallion.
\V. i\l. Patrick, two year old colt
S. H. Patrick, one year old colt.
Jtio. Rnn*ev, brood nmrc aiU colt,
)nc vear old coir.
M. Y. Bankhead, brood mare and ,
-Oit. ' j;
J. 1). Patrick, colt one vear old.
J. W. Powell, untie colt, brood i
Bare, colt iwo \ear.", old.
Ja*. Mctie, colt one year old.
P. M. 15. llolk'v, mule colt tinder .'J 1
'ears. j "
Saial Calhcart, Sr., bruud mare, J
Qckling colt, colt one year old. ! <
Saiul Cathcarr, Jr., two vcar old j t
olt. ' j f
I). K 'j. vnr <>'d
W. W ir i-'i.i .furs 1 > I.
L. 1!. Mm im > >>:-< >d maiv * dc>]t.
(?. U. 1 ?!;>: !, ?: Ii i * i> \ car old.
Awunlril.
II*-; ?ix ?i ii > corn. T. \\\ Ravrls,
s->. St.cuI. F. A Neil, si.
i*e-r >ix -!:iik? corn, .J M. .Stewart. !
>r~2. S?r:#:id. F. I>. Ai!>!i:i ?1
i>e>! Imlo ctittoii. Y> . If. 1 )->tv. $! ?.
S.'cojkI. T. \\ . Haw!*
i>:??t <i .- i" 1f > t-. .1 M. Stewart.
> -. Si'i'tnnl. W . A. Neil. vI.
l>e>l l>;i-!it:i bread roni. F. F. IVymi,
9"J. Svfinid. II L Mo'iiiiv >1
]Je>l bu In*: >'.<)' >: S ii "i't-j?
race Second. F. I? Au?:i;i SI.
IIe?t !>u>!ici o;?:>. w. I). I>avi?. s-j
Sreond, \V. M. i'atriek. >'1.
U''<t bn<lie! V?*. A X .*il. $2.
SiM-und. !> (i. Teimawt. >'1.
Ii"sr l?u>hcl sweet potatoes, .J. W'.
Wvlir. .Second. T. (J Robertson.
*1
* ? ? ? _ . * . . i \ *
niisiici in-;i jnuaioc*. ?>
Wvlie, Second. I'. Ij. .1 ,
Si".
I>esi bushel turnip-. '1'. U Kawls.
?2. Second, F M (.Jud.-den, $1
I?? >! bu<lsel beets, .Ino Isenliower.
$2. Second. T L .Johnston. SI.
IJrsi LfaI! ?j ^*?r*fhu:n. T W l?obe:i( on
*2 Serund, F M Gadsden $1.
Largest and best collection of peas, j
T. L Johnston, $o Largest and best;
collection of garden vegetables, M. M.
Iluey. $2. Src.in.'I, Mrs II A Gaillard,
81.
Largest pumpkin, S II Terrace,
Amrri>;iu AyricuUtiru'' it.
ItOl'SF.IIOI.D DEi'ARTMEXT.
ten pounds lard, T. W. Uiw!*,
$2. S?cond, Jn?>. M. Smith, $1
15-st pound butter, Sam Cathcart, Sr.,
$2. Second, F. Elder, $1.
l>r?i loaf bread, Mi*? Anna McUants,
$3. Second, Mrs. F. M. Clarke, $1.
Best home cured ham, T. W. RhwI",
$2. Second, Mrs. I{. E.Ellison.. $1.
IJi'St collcciioll of hpplce, Jno. M.
Smith, $2 Second, Jno lseiibo*ver,
?1.
Best collection dried Irnif, T L
Jolni-ou, $2. Second ,Jno M. Smith,
$1.
l?e?t >ix vmietie* ot preserve*, Mrs
Jas M Smith, $2. Second, Mrs T
uaiueii, v>i.
B sr six varieties of jellie?, Mr* M
II Mublt'Y, $2 Sccond Mrs H Y
Mill tig, 1."
I5cs' >>ix varieties canned frails, Mrs
M M Mobley, $2. Second, Mrs Jno
M Sm.th, $i.
Be*t lour varieties <>t canned vegetable.*
Mis 11 Y Milling, $2. Second
Mrs T Harden, 81.
Hoi six varieties pickle*, Mrs II Y
Milling, S2. Second, Mrs Jas M
Smith, $1.
Best quart blackberry wine, Mrs
D .T Macaulay, $2. Second, Mrs M
11 Mobley, Si.
Best quart grape wine, Mrs S H
McUants, ?2. Second, Mrs Jas liichmond,
$i.
FINE ART AND FANCY WORK..
Be.st collection chrysanthemums,
Mrs II K Itomcdv $2. Second, Mrs
11 A Gaillard >>1.
I>est collection pet plants, Mrs W B
Murray, 82.
Best piece of fancy work, Mrs F M
Clarke, $2. Second, Miss Eunice
("on nor $1.
Best exhibit of tine art, Iter It 11
Jones. ?1.
LIVE STOC K.
Best slallien of any age, 11 A McMeekin,
Second, J L Lemmon,
S.?
Best brood mare and colt, Sam'l.
Cut heart, :>r., ^0.
Best suckling colt, Sanfl Catlicart,
$ *>.
Best colt one year old, J B Patrick,
Second, Jus Macfie $2.
Best colt two years old, J A Douglass
$5. .Second, W S "Weir $2.
U?:st colt ttirec years, J M Jtewart,
$ 3. Second, Jiio ltao,sey $2.
Best snokling mule colt, P M B
II<?iley, $5. Second, J W Powell, $2.
Best male colt over one year, C S
Ford, $'). Second, W B Dixou, $2.
LJast brood ipare and suckling' mule
cnlr, \V. B. Dixon, $5. Second P M
B Ilolley .$2.
cattle.
Best bull, J M Galloway, $5.
Second, F Elder, $2.
Best cow, F Elder, $5. Socond, F
E Propst, $2.
Best heifer calf, Samul Catlicart, Sr,
$'>. Second, Jys A Brice, $2.
Best milch cow, Dr T B Madden, $5.
Socond, li E Elli?ui, $2.
noes and snitKr.
Best boar, any breed, II S Wylie,
Sicond M II. Moblev, $2.
Best sow any breed, G B Gibson,
$.3. Second, Saml Cathcar;, Sr, $2.
Best pair of p'g-j under six month*,
M H Mobler, $5. Second, II G
Wylie,
Best pen of sheep S II Terrace, $o.
Second, F A Neil, $2.
FOWLS AXD RABBITS.
Best pair Plymouth Rocki, M M
Ilney, $2.
P>est pair Brahmas, E A Rabb, $2.
Best pair Leghorns, Mrs T Harden,
$2.
Best pair Games, M H Mobley, $2.
Best pair Lawfirshans, J F McMastcr,
?2.
Best pair Buff Cochins, Rev R JI
Jones, $2.
Best pair Bantams, F M Clarke, $1.
Best pair turkevs, R W Featherston,
s2.
Best pair geese, liL Mobley, $2.
Best pair ducks. R L Mobley, $2.
Best display of pigeons, J F McM
aster, $1.
Best display of rabbits. W M C'athcartli.
$>*1.
J: USIXESS MEE TIXG.
At a business meeting of the F. A S.
Wednesday, the following officers
were elected for the ensuing year,
viz.:
l'icsident?Jas M Stewart.
Vice President??1. T B AhsUb. 2.1
.1 M Iliggins. 3 Sand Cathcart, Jr. 4.
F A XcH.
Executive Committee?J IJ Patrick.
T W 1'obertson, T L Johnston, M II
Mob|?v, \Y A Xeii.
.Secretary and Treasurer ? 11 u*rli
Wylie
All of these wcii leinen arc eminently
well qualified for the positions to
which they have been elected, aad
under their management the Association
will continue to thrive and
prosper.
Resolutions were pr po^ed and
adopted thanking Mr. S. 1). Dunn for
his able, useful and practical address,
and tequesting that it he given to both
county papers fer publication.
Motions were made and carried, returning
the thanks of the Society to
uie Gordons for the use of the Armory,
to the ladies for their presence, and
zealous efforts in making the Institute
a success to the people of Winnsboro
for their social and financial support,
mid to Messrs. Doty and Turner for
the use of their lots.
The combination of ingredients I
found in Ayer'o lMls renders them
onie and curative as well us cathartic,
for (his reason thevare ihe be?t medicine
for people of costive habit, as
bey restore the natural action of the
)0*vels, without debilitating. *
MR. DUXX'S ESS At. 1
A Thoughtful, Iseful, l'rsicticsil 1'aper (
Ktiuil litrforn the Farmers* Institute. !
Mr. Preside d and Members the Fairfield
Agricultural Sucirbj:
The subject, "Cotton Seed Meal as a j
Stock Food and Fertilizer," on which 1
your committee has honored me with j
an invitation to write an essay. is one i
of great importance. Although my j
attention has but recently been directed ^
to it. ?L't, what knowledge I have been :
in v^o'Mivl to it I filter- :
IV ^AUIVl 1?? I IW *?? V...-V4 j
fully give with the hope of inducing!
those of you who may not have done
.so will investigate il for yourselves. |
With a great many fanners the cultivation
of the soil has become more j
and more unprofitable and con>eijueni Iv ;
agricultural depression is now upon us. j
Some of the underlying causes, other j
than political, that have led to this
state of affairs at the South ure aa almost
exclusire attention to cotton with i
its consequent overproduction, carelessness
in providing against soil exhaustion,
uneconomical, wasteful and unscientific
methods ?f agriculture. To
bring ab?ut a betterment of our concondition,
all are agreed, but few
practice it, that we must diversify, intensify
and economize. In eflectiug this
change of system, which is slowly
taking place, cotton seed meal is destined
f play an important part. IJy
means of it the feeding and growing
of stock successfully at the S?uth is
assured. Indeed, it is confidently predicted
by distinguished political economists
that cotton ?eed meal will in the
?n?a?* fntiiTK lnjikc the South one of the
greatest cattle and sheep raising1 conn-;
tries in the w?rkl. When Southern '
farmers turn their attention to this i
industry, a smaller area will be planted !
in cotton, which is one of the most
exhaustive crops raised, and more of
our washed hill sides will be turned
into pastures, fodder and grain fields.
Then will the fertility of our soil be
increased and the intensive system be
practiced. And with the advancing
knowledge of the science and art of
agriculture that is being developed at
the experiment stations and agricultural
colleges, and disseminated by
wide-awake farmers who study and
; apply the teachings of science, and
also by the interchange of ideas, promoted
by your prize clubs, institutes
and fairs, we may hopefully look forward
in the not distant future to an
era of better times.
One of the greatest drains on the
pockets of Southern farmers hus been
their dependence on the West for
supplies and stock the purchase of
which exhausts almost all of their profits
on cotton. Xow, a remedy for
this unfortunate habit into which a |
large number of the farmers of the I
i South has fallen is hanoilv at hand. I
Cotton seed meal, a cheap, rich and |
abundant home product can be used to j
supplement our own grain and forage j
crops >o as to enable us t? raise the
supplies and stock we have been and |
are still largely purchasing of the |
West. It is iiiv object to endeavor to i
show how this mar be done by a judicious
u?? of the meal.
We are told by agricultural chemists
that food for animals can be divided
into two broad classes, the flesh or |
muscle forming and the fat or heat j
producing elemc..U. By a series of j
the most systematic and laborious ex- j
perirnents with living animals, the:
results of which command the confidence
of farmers the world over,
German scientists have deduced data
which show approximate!v the ratio
,1- .1: 4:i.u n-P !
ill tVIJIVIi lilC UlgUSllUJC fiuiiiviia V/JL I
ihese two food constituents should bo j
supplied daily to different animals'
under different conditions Now these j
accurately ascertained facts, called j
feeding- standards, which indicate the j
amount of food to be fed per day and ;
the proportion of the muscle and the j
heat producing- elements, called the |
nutritive ratio, that shall be present in j
the ration, that i* a mixture of a day's J
supply of food, have thrown a flood;
of light on the subject of animal nil- j
trition that is revolutionizing our >
system ef stock feeding.
From the reports of the Experiment |
Stations ?r any work 011 stock feeding j
you will flnd tables giving the compe-:
sition of food stuft's and directions for j
compounding such materials as you '
may have so as to correspond to the I
feeding standards and thereby utilize
, them in the in?st economical manner.;
It is of the greatest importance to
comply with the requirements of the
feeding standard for should an animal
not redeye enough of either of the
two elements of food to meet all the j
demands of growth, fatteningor work, j
it cannot thrive no matter if the other j
element be fed in abundance. Again.
should the two constituents not be
furnished in the proper proportion
there would result a waste of natiitive
material and injury to the animal beeidfi;.
When fh* amount of the heat
producer* is large in comparison with i
the amount of muscle producers present
in a ration, the rati? for con-1
renience of expression is said to he '
wide, on the contrary it is called i
narrow. In hi* report of 1?00, Dr. j
Burner, than State Chemist,said: Mt:
may be laid down as a general princi- \
pie for this State that it 1* wasteful to !
feed a wide ratio to stock when at !
work, to milk cows, and to fattening i
animals; particularly is this true of!
those cases in which the material*!
have to he bought. For instance, ti* j
feed a work horse on corn and corn j
fodder alot.c when corn has to bebought
cannot be called economical !
feeding, for it is using a wide ratio j
w hen a comparatively narrow one is j
needed; and when, too, a highly con-)
j centrated food with which to make the j
I ratio narrow can be had at a small |
cost in the form of cotton seed meal, j
It is true that this old method may be j
more convenient and less troublosomc t
than a rational system of feeding, but!
it is no longer economical as in the
days of our fathers." And the chemist j
here means bt economical feeding not I
a parsimonious saving of food, but a I
vi<?lit distribution in nec?ssarv abuu- I
j - ?
dunce of all I lie chepest materials at
hand so as to nmkc everything1 perform
its full part and preclude all
waste. Now the whole science or i
stock feeding, which, in recent years. I
has been developed by experiment!?!
conducted with all the care, and skill i
that science and money could Command, i
may be summed up in th?? following j
laws: (1) foods must be so mixed ,
that the proportion of digestible I,
muscle producing matter to heat pr?ducing
matter, i. e., the nutritive ratio,;
shall correspond to a certain standard: 1
( j) a proper bulk of dry matter must !
be secured?expressed by the total ,
weight of dry organic matter in the 1
ration; and (2) a lixedquantity of this !1
compounded ration must be fed per '
day. !
These laws may be relied <>n with \ '
perfect contidence and you may be as-1 1
cured that nonconformity to them in ! *
any marked degree mean* injury t? 1
stock, waste ef food and therefore ; ,
loss of money to you. Let us see, j
now, of what practical value these laws j '
mav be to us. Dr. Burney, in an j \
address at Pendleton, South Carolina. ! *
August 7th 1S89, said: "You have ajs
farm and on il both stock to feed and |'
several kinds of feeding stutl's. Sup- i \
po.se we say rou have cotton seed meal, i
corn meal. oats,, oats straw, and corn (
fodder. What can we do with these i
material)?? We can do that which is M
seldom ever done in this parr of the I ^
world, in so far as I am aware. We ! f
can so work in cotton ^ed meal int? j 1
/
*
ration.- made of these feeds as to use ,
tliem all tip. jjood aiul bad alike, and j
that. too. \virl?Mit nny waste, and in I
such a wav u> the full feeding j
vaiueuui wi LuiiAi ?*?*.
Is not this worth the do'ng? I j
hazard the assertion that tiiere is n? !
more important problem before the
people of this State to-dav than the intelligent
utilization of their cheap
feeding stutrs in combination with
cotton seed meal food for stock. j
In this favored land we have all that |
we need, and more, wherewith to feed ,
and to fatten <>tir stock if we will but i
learn to use it aright. There is not
the slightest exciue for our drawing !
upon tin.* corn cribs of the Xorthwc?t j
save our indisposition to le.rn new j
methods." '-One thing is absolutely j
certain; these details of feeding, the !
farmer must study and master. In [
this age of sharp and close competi- !
tion. it is not merely the worker, but |
it is not merely the worker, but it is
the intelligent, wide-awake worker
wiio wins."
To illustia e the practical value and
to make clear the meaning of the laws
of fit: ding, lot us take an example or
so.
Suppose we wish to fatten a srerj
of 1,000 lbs. w? ight. liv reference to
a table of feeding standards we find
that such an animal will require daily
during the first period, 27 lbs. dry
organic matter containing1 2-i lbs.
muscle and lu? lb->. heat producing
elements with a nil ritive ratio o! 1 to
C-i. Now, let u< take 20 lfcs. corn
fodder and 10 lbs. corn meal. These |
will furnish approximately 27A lhs. I
drv matter containing lbs. nnw:le
and 10-i lbs. hea- producing con-titiietits
with a nu'ritive rati-) of 1 t > 105.
This ration, yon notice, furnishe all
the drv matter, 27 lb*., req tired which
contains 1 lb. in'ire of the he it prxlu -ers
than i? necessary, but fails by 1 lb. to
supply all the muscle producers tint
it should. Such a ration is nor svv.ll
balanced and the result aimed at in
feeding it, would not be oblaiuel.
Now let us substitute 4 lbs cotton
seed meal tor 4 lb-, corn meal, and
feed 26 lbs. corn fodder, G lb<. c >rn
meal and 4 lb?. cot ion seed meal.
This rati >n will give approximately
27A lbs. dry organic nutter containing
23 lbs. muscle producers and 152 lhs.
heat producers with a nutritive ratio
ofltoG.j. You sec that this ration is
well balanced, meets k!I the rrqnirements
of the feeding' standards and
will therefore fully nunsh and fatten
the animal tor whieh it is preparer! and
that, too, without waste Example*
like the above might be Nitiliipiied, but
1 his one is sufficient ts> show the way
in which we claim that cotton seed
meal should be utilized.
If any one will aive tr.e a !i?t ot the
feeding uvder als he may haw :it hand
and tell me wh st kind of animal ho
wishes to feed. I will take pleasure in
- l.t... i; . I..,.
UUJClIUliliig iituuii* lyi imij j
as 1 may be able to do mi conecily.
Must ?t out* common lepilinjr ^iuli'?
arc rich in thr heat pr? <In?-i?;??, hut
deficient in ihe in a-de forming H?*
ment9. In tin.othy hav for every 1 lb.
flesh producers theic are 12 lb?. h* ?t
producers.
In oat straw ihe proportion is 1 to
28.
In corn meal it i< 1 to 9 U 10.
In wheat bran 1 to 4:3 It).
In cotton seed meal 1 to 1 2-o.
Ajain let lis compare a tew of t!;c>e
foods in this way:
In 100 lb*, outs there are -Sii lb',
digestible flesh forming subsianm
In 100 lbs. corn there are >>J lb?.
In 100 lbs. wheat bran 113 U>>.
In 100 lbs. cotton seed utral the re
are DC lbs. fllesh forming1 snb.-iances. |
On ihe other hand, 100 lb?. cmn, for
iiis-tarj. e, contains 75 !b>. iieat |>roducinjr
elements v. hi Its the same
-i- * 1 .......1 L.il |fclll
quuillll V 1)1 UUlimi \i rzm u.n >itu i
51 lbs. heat producf-rs. Anil ihu? it
inav be shown that all our other food
s'nfl's as compared with cotton seel
meal arc rich in the chief heat producing
element, but deficient in the
costly Ilesh forming constituents.
Dr. Barney again sa\s, '-stwekfeediug
as generally practiced by our
people is, I fear, a highly \va>trfu!
process, befcides heit g more or les*
injurious t?> stock. The trouble, as
you ?ee, lies in fact that the rations
are neither properly prepared nor
properly balanced. Hie leiuedy i?
cheat and comparatively easy; it
consists in tlie intelligent use of cotton
seed nual in the ration- fol. The
merits oft his great f<?od, as well as
its dangers, lie in its incomparable
feeding value. And when I >av
incomparable, I u-e tiir term adv<>ab:y,
for there does not. ?ro?v in all tlir
land, a single feeding stnlf il;nt b.gius
to compare with it in nutritive value,
pound for pound. Of corn our great
and invincible tyrani it take- anoui
two pounds to equal one of good
- i - t. - r i 1 1
COIlvMl SCC'ii IXJUili I 1141 I* vac i"*J
cot ton feci me:il is abon t equal to two
tou? of corn lor feeding s>!ock. lienumber
I liat next P|>riwhen you
bi'gin 1" spread it oil lhe lui:i, f?r, 1
teli \on now, \ou will be scattering
gold du-t to the winds. Yon may
not know that this mral has hall tli*;
strength *-1" thr white ot' an e^g.
Indeed ttiis very concent ration :is u
feed stnil".-veins to h:iv* b-.et', n;? to
tIds time one of ti.e chief hindrances
to i;> irenem! adoption as a food for
stock. .Mi'ii ?-iiher did not know of
ili* extreme concentration or ihey did
not dul) c iii-i !. r sii.it Mron*r food
must b. >;>:iriii^!y fed. Over-iVcdiny: |
of>ncli inatrii.il tiiidoiib:?'di\ |#r.??J;ii*cs
r< vulsion of tl.e :ipf? tin*, :i:.d general
dt-rangenient of aninri! sv>iem.
From these considerations it is clear
that cotton seed meal is not to b? fed
alone, but that it.- juoper }>!aee is a*
the basis or foundation < ! Mns rations
which we feed to our Mock. Us true
mission i-lo furnish ilie albuminoids
['hat is fitsh producers] 1 >r raiions
tnis being the constituent generally
delie.ient in most ot ihe common
feeding sums, ji is i.erc mm couou
seed meal finds it* proper t-flice. It ia
liir m:i:cli.41 ihut shouid oisituie the
s'roii^ part of every ration fed on
our form*. And in this way ever,
fanner should learn '.o use it.*' You
may experience Seine d:{liculty at li;>t
iu getting the >t?'ck to cut tin) meal,
hut hy mixing it \vi h other tine food
as when' bran or corn meal to give the
ration a good fl i\* ?r tt.is iliffi-Thy
will be avoided. A' s??-1: a- the ia-.e
of Ihe aisim il heroines ueeiw.iuii-? to
it, no further'1 llimiu r.eel he apprehended.
(';ire t?:u-1 id ways be t.tkrn j
t see Sh;tl rations are wliolf.??,me and
wei! 11 ?vored for it not ieli.-hod by
Ihe stoek, rhey will not be digested
;ind will therefor.- be wasted.
In addition to what has already been
said, there is one more point in foror
of cotton >eed meal as a fo ?ti \ et to
he ei>n?idered. Eeonotninul feeding j
not only requites that the ration be
^impounded of I lie cii< :?p ->t materials !
it coaiiiund so as to eunloim :o the j
t( eding standards other tilings bein^ j
'qua!: but alas that preference in j
mixing the ration be given tv th-?se j
;nbsiaiic-> iiche>t i:i lei tilizoig con-j
Mituenis, when il'ccos'. is iSic same. [
Now by :ic:u.il chemical andvsu, |
Dr. .Jenkins of:be Conm-iieni Experi- j
Ufiit Station tells us tlia* the value of j
i Ion of' C'ini meal aficr being fed to j
itoek is ?4 ><4: that of a 'on of cotton !
iccil meal >122.44. Animals in di- j
jesting" cotton seed meal deprive it ot j
)n!y about .1-10 of its plant f>od.
IVIimi tljC-Mlpei i<?r icrlilixin^ value ot
otton seed meal at'er being fed is
aken into consideration together
villi the fact that its feeding value is
louble^'thai of corn meal how foolish,
ndeed, diies it appear in U3 to spread
t on the plow it in with a
t
\
) _
mule fed on corn and fodder, .1 ration
which by furnishing neirly twice hs
much of tne heat producing iirttciia's
a? the mule requires not only injure* I
the nin'e, but impoverishes i-s o*ner. |
Yet thi* c-?tl??n seed meal m'xed wirh j
corn and f ?dder would forma j> r ect. j
ration widch, at a. ?mall co>t and J
withott: wi->re, would maintain Hie'
^ . ? i
mule in uood working condition. '
Ilere in the South where the merit* '
0- COtt?'ii seed meal as a loud need j
nust i' tie appreciated los con>idcr- j
ation ha-; hitherto bi*?*n givm 'o it ;
thau abroad. Xoitht-inei> ami Euro-!
pcaus have l??!iy siue.e learned its i
valuable qualities. AnnuaMv thousands j
Of tons tnat >!it>ri 1 ii be retained anil j
utilized liete arc -hipped north audi
exhibited to f >reijjh countries lor i
feeding purposes. Experience has ;
taught Northern farmer.- mat it is a j
great wasis to aplpy the meal to the
land as a fertilizer. They first teed it j
and thereby get duuble value wtit of it.
Its feeding value is in the neighbor- ]
hood of $40 per ton. its commercial j
value as a fertilizer about $25. It fed ,
something like one tenth of t he plant!
food contained in it is lost, therefore,
if the manure be saved, a ton of it is
worth $40 plus $26 less $2.50 which
is SC2.50. If used taerelv as a fertilizer
its value is $'25. The difference therebv
between the two methods of using
it is S37.50 per ton.
An expeiimctd New York dairyman j
says, "1 introduced cotton seed meal j
as a food for dairy cows in this Section.
I have led it eight years, the first four |
in connection with other grain feeds.'
The last four years we have used |
nothing but pure s?vcet cotton seed |
meal, except that while the cows are j
dry and on course foddea we give [
them such grein as we produce a d I
wheat bran. As soi?n as the cows
coinein fall milk we give two rations
Of hay a da?, a three quart ration of
cotton seeJ meal in the morning and
two quarts ai night, until turned cut
ti pasture when they get two quails
a day. When at hay, the month g I
rsilioil UI lUCHI i> 111 J A CI I v\ lllJ Oi-X Vjucnie ;
of sweet skimine* milk.
Under this regime!! we l.e;p 25 per !
cent more butter pjr c >w than by ihe
other graiu method. Tnreexea.'s ago
I was iiot able to secure enougU cotton
seed meal, and we a l;a:t ration
ot that and the other half wheat bran,
and ihe result was a. loss of 76 pounds
of butter in one week 1'ioin our dairy J
of fitcy cows. I regard the manurial
value of cotton seed meai, us obser/ed |
by me, of very great importance.
Four years ago v\e manured from
corn and #aU feeding, and ih-s other
half from cotton iced intral feeding;
ihe latter cat double the lm*. Tins
jear we buwe 1 the fieidiu buckwheat,
an.J the crop shows the same difference.
Our pastures are giving similar evidences
from the summer cotioti seed
meal rations.
I he enhanced value of the manure
pa-, s the cost oi the cotton seed meal.
In 1889 \Y. E. Stone, of the Agricultural
Experiment Station, of Tennessee
made inquiries as to the extent anil
stuu c-s of feeding cotton seed meal
and hulls alone lo cattle, and he says
iij.-ic hisin\estigatious seem to justify
the following conclusions:
1. The practice of feeding cotton
M*t d hulls Hud meal as an exclusive
uiet i? well established and increasing
in the viciuiiv of the centers of the
cu ton seed oil industry. All the
information available indicate lhat
the practice is economical and profitable.
2. It seems in no way harmful to
the healtn of the anirmi nor 10 me
lieakhluliies* oi the prodr.cts (beef and
in ilk) resulting
The diet stews adapted both to
the production of beef and mutton, as
well as uiiik.
4. The average ration should consist
of 25-35 ibs. of Lulls and 5 8 lbs. of
meal daily.
5. The hulls are a cheap otidiflbcLfve
substitute for h-y.
6. The manure produced by this
system of feeding i? an important
factor in considering Its profitableness.
Ic is estimated that last season
about 5C,00U head of cattle were fattened
on hulls and meal alone in the Soathwest.
In an old State like ours where
manuring i? so essential to the production
of remuneration crops the
business of cattie feeding should
receive m?re attention than it generally
d?es. Congressman Stackhouse in an
address on "luteu&ive Famiing,"
which he delivered a lew weeks ago
at lied Springs, X. C., said:
"In older countries having a deuse
population stock iaising is believed to
oe necessary to keep up and to increase
the fertility oi the *oil. If stock
raising can be made to contribute to
the improvement of the soil, and that
opinion in tbe countries referred to is
based on long1 continued and intelligent
observation aud a careful study of
the subject, why should we not jjrow
all the stock that our people need? In
?tock growing we have many advantages
over the countries referred to.
We have cheaper land, and the fact
that our cotton seed meal aud cotton
seed oil cake is purchased in these
3AI1JC WU iu ttuiui ng iiutu
referred as believing that stock
raising beiifttits soil improvements to
be used as stock food, is but one
evidence of the folly ot ourdependence
011 other* to supply us with stock and
the other supplies mentioned. The
tact now seems to be well established
that the cotton seed bulls train the oil
mills makes an excellent food for
cattle and sheep."
Cotton seed meal is now the
cheapest ammonlated fertilizer on the
market, but I am persuaded that the
time is not far distant wheu the entire
output of the mill* will l>e utilized as
stock food. While too rich to be ted
to horses, mules aud bogs, as we get
it from the mills, it can t>e mixed with
rough feed, and thereby overcome
that objection, and it will then be j
relatively much cheaper than corn
meal as stock food."
It It T'iie not lor fear of wearying
you, I u.ight aud other testimonials
as to the rain* of cotton seed meal as
a leeding stufi'; but, I think, enough
lias b?eu given to sho?v tliat it at least
merits attention and trial at y<>ur
hands. A gentlemau a lew days ago,
saic to me; 4'\Vby," said he, "talk of
the Eldorado of California! if we
can feed cotton seed meal to our stock.
we hare a far richer E dorado rigi:t
uere in South (Juruliua. Indeed, as
s?>on as its niciiis and right u>? become
generally known, cotton seed uieal
will undoubtedly cft'eot a revolution
i:i stock feeding that will annually
save hundreds ot' thousands of dol lars j
to Southern farmers.
As to the use ot the meal as a ferti* I
lizer you must be governed by the
principles that underlie the right use
oi all fertilizing materials. By t&e
term fertilizing is meant any substance
which when applied to the soil will
cause a better growth and development
of plants. The chemical anai)si*
of vegetables shows that all, with-,;
out exception contain fourlecn elemeu- I
tary substances. These element I
though variously combined in different !
plants are absolutely essential to
normal vegetable growth. Should a
soil be abundantly rich in all these
^ubs=tances save one it would remain
barren to all intents and purposes
until supplied with the wanting constituents.
Furl hermore these elements
must not only be pre^eut in the soil
and in the atmosphere, but they must
be available as plant food, ihat is,
[Liey must oe 1U IUU yiwcuua wim VI
soluble in water in order to be
assimilated by plants. Hence ferti
lization is the process of maintaining
in ihe soil t he necessary available
SiiptiitiS ot plant food. The srr?^ifbillk
of tlu plain (95 per cent, uf
tnoiv) is compo*ed ot carbon, hvdiv>gen
and ?>x\ gen, elements wtiieh t'je "
soil and air furn >h i?i abundance.
Of the remaining ^uhxtances ih*t only
one* ietn-raMy in whi'j ordinary .-oiis
are tot wr11 >uppiied are nit ??s.en,
pho.*ph?>ric :?ei?! ami potash. Tin'tetore
ilie.*e three Hement* <.l plant food
are ill- iirst t<> b <x'?au*ied bv the
production of crop*. !I'*nce the
wluie >ri. t.ce ot' tei tiliz;i:ou, in m>
tar a* furnikning plant food is concerned,
resolves it.*elf into maintaining
in the soil a Mi!li;ient supply ot
available nitrogen, ul;< sphoric acul
and |)0':i?h io fully nuris the crop to
be arown. Now, since no plant can
Nattaiu id a mural suuc or' growth and
imitate unices properly furnished
with avaiiable food i;i d.ic amou'tt
and proportion the exceedingly ? re-it
importance of the right u?e of fertilizers
becomes evident. The<e facts
make it ver\ plain that it i< pojr
economv to attempt to raise ciops on
an insufficient supply of any of the
element? of f jod required.
And also, that if the fertilizing
elements be not furnished in the proportion
demanded bv the plant there
will result onesided development ami
waste of material.
Ilence to intelligently and economically
use fertilizers knowledge on two
points is required: 1. With regard
to the needs of the crop to be produced
and the ability of the soil to supply
these need*. 2. With regard to tbe
composition of fertilizers used and
their ability to buppletnent the deficiencies
of the soil. Information on
the tirst snbjeet can only be obtained
by long careful and intelligent observation
by the farmer himself '.pan his
own field?. With regard to the 9
composition ?.f fertilizer a chemical a
analy>i- will show their constituents 1
and in >i genera! way, their ?.fficier.cy in
the soil.
' - t
[u ii.c early da>s ot agricultural
I c;.fuii'iry it was thought lhat chemical
i mini*>i.s oftl t plant and soil would
.'pccdil/ *ettle the mailer of just the way
in which to use leriilizera so as to
produce maximum crops. This theory,
j however, when subjected to actual ^
I practice, failed utlerlv. It wra." dis
j covered that plants differed widely in
I their power of appropriating ihe
[ matter of tne soil. Tne cow pea for
> instance can utilize source* ot nitro- S
| gen lying far below the reach of B
shallow rooted plants as corn ^
! and oats. Long and carelully
conducted experiments have also
shown that nitrogen is uccessary to
the production of a vigorous growth
of weed; that phosphate acid must be
supplied for the production of the
seeds, and, also, to check undue development
of weed and favor fruit
I production; and that potash is required
for the woody parts of the plant and
seems to aid in the transfer of nutri*
t % i ~ - I? 3
tive inatlcr ana prooaoiv enecKs *ne?- v
ding and prevents rust. And, experimentation
has also revealed the exceedingly
interesting and important ~~
fact, that in order to produce the best
results, nitrogen, phosphate acid and
potash must be supplied to the soil not
only in different amounts and proportions
for different plants, but that
the-e amounts and proportions are by
no means those which a chemical
analysis of the crop would indicate.
For example, bi lbs. nitrogen, 26 lbs.
phosphate acid and 43 lbs. potash are '~required
for a crop of 300 lbs. lint
cotton; but Dr. McBryde, who while
in Colorado, conducted some of the
most valuable experiments ever yet
made in cotton culture, thinks that the
best results would be obtained by applying
something like ? to ? the nitrogen,!
to the phosphate acid and
I the potash required for a crop of 300
lbs. lint cotton. ^ ^
1 statenheSTfaerTfor two purposes.
first to show that the economical use
^ P A.l.tlll./mv ico ?i<ict difficultni'rthlem.
one which every fanner should carefully
study. We can almost safely
say "that in 91) cases out of 100 the
application of fertilizers is mere guess
work ami consequently these result?
annually are enormous waste of material.
Some apply them in insufficient
quantities, others injudiciously and still
others in reckless extravagance.
My other object is to be able more
clearly to show the value and the position
of cotton seed meal as a fertilizer
and to indicate the most economical
way to use it in order to
obtain the best results. A chemical
analysis shows that cotton seed meal
is composed of about per cent
X JI-.0, per cent P--', O-o and 1-i percent
K-2 O. It is therefore, to be
valued principally for the ammonia it
contains, and you must not look to it 4
for all the plant food needed by a crop.
It must never be used alone unless on
soils known to be fully furnished with
phosphate acid and potash, but deficient
in nitrogen; and, again, it should
not be applied to lands already rich in
ammonia as it would stimulate undue
growth of weed and prevent proper
fruiting. The right way, generally, to
use cotton seed meal is to mix it with
-ftllMl iclli ll<y ll!w\Cllhn tn
I VlIIVJl i!JUlV.i lilio XUIU4CI??W9
acid and potash so as to supplement
: the resources oi the soil that it may be
able to fully nourish the particular
crop :o be grown.
The meal has many advantages over
the whole seed as a fertilizer, 700 lbs.
of it being: equivalent to a ton of seed.
Therefore there is less cost in handling
ir Being, too, in a finely divided
fci.V.e it may be more evenly and thoroughly
distributed and mixed with the
soil. This is an important matter in
the application of all fertilizers. They
should be ihoroughly mixed with the
soil otherwise the roots of the plant in
seeking food will become bunched up
in a small space and thereby not be
able to obtain moisture and withstand j
drouth as well as when spread out over
a large area. Again, decomposition i
of the meal sets in soon after it is put
into the ground, thereby rendering the
plant food it contains readily available. i f?$*
On some soils, however, the whole ' J
seed may be more profitably used than V jgi
meal. For instance on heavy clay j
soils which are usually deficient in
vegetable matter, whole seed wiil be
beneficial not only in supplying humus
b:tt in the mechanical effect of reu- r.
dering the soil lighter and mov porous. ?
Jjuch soils, however, should receive
all the coarse trash and filth off the
farm, and he planted in crops tiiat
will fill them with vegetable matter. fjli
But, wricn the soil is supplied with
hinnus and is l'ght and fr::<ble it will
he found more economical, other v'f-rfj
things being equal, t > u*c meal than
the whole seed. has been said 700
lbs. of meal is equivalent in fertilizing
value to a ton of seed This is true
since practically there are 110 fertilizing
elements in the hulls, lint or oil
renioye.1 from the seed; the lint and k
oil containing none at all and the
hulls but very little. Xow that the
lint and oil have no elements of fcrti-^vjB
lizatiun is revealed by their chemical
analysis. They arc each composed of
carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, ele- . -fl
ments that- iu various combinations H
up thf> frrf>n< hnft all plautS "H
illlU, ailliuai.s. JiiVI! KDUU HW(Vv- Ub C4.ilj
anxiety about supplying plains with H
these elements. For the carboihjn the B
form of carbonic acid gas come'3 al- V
most entirely from the air, the hydrogen
and oxygen (mainly in the form
of water) fro;n both the air and the
soil. If the oil, some one might ask.
is of no fertilizing value, then why i-j
it contained in the seed!' This interesting
question can be easily answered.
Nature put the oil in the seed tQ