VOL. I. ABBEVILLE, S. ('., WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 8, 1884. NO. 2. /""10LVMH1A A N'D Vy URKKN VILI.E HA II.HO A 1>. f Oil and after August 17, 18S4, I'ashksokb Tkaixh will run as herewith indicated upon this road an?l its branches. ,H />? ily, txcrpt Shlulntif. [ ' So. 53. Ul'l'ASSKNUKR ! ?> LqjfrVe Columbia S. (5. .Iiiuc'n. . .12 3.") p m : L " Columbia C. A <>. D 12 50 p m j & Arrive Alston 1 50 j? in B . " Newberry 2 54 p in i Ninety-Six 1 17 p in in JA Greenwood 4 57 p in I St Hodges. 5 21 p in j m H Helton. (> 28 p in .,j, BE ?t Greenville 7 50 p in X H No. 52. DOWN I'ASSKNGKR. n Leave Greenville at 10 05 n in I tii BB Arrive lteltou. 11 28 a in I JD Hodge* 12 40 p in j _ Db 'Greenwood 1 06 pin ! Ninety-Six 1 30 p in Newberry 3 II p in |^S Alston. 4 12 p in '* Columbia C. A G. 1> 5 15 pni x Arriv* Columbia SC. Jiine'lt 5 30 p in HB Sl-AUTANIU 1H1, rsios A COI.IMI1I A KAII.ftOAll. 1,] HB . . NO. '53. ri> I'ASSKNOKIj. fn |H Heave Alston .. 1 52 p 111 hi SB Arrive fitrothcr 2 31 j> in Si ? ' Shelton 2 5H p in W Union 4 02 pv.i \v< " .loneaville 4 4". p in to * '- Spartanburg, S.l*.AC.depot 5 :io in : .4rrive Spartanburg, H.A1). depot 5 40 p in H no. 52. j?o\vn I'ASskxcki:. 0 Li ve Spart'g R. A I). Kepot . . .. 11 55n ni f M " Spart'g S.-U. A V. Depot ..12 115 a m 1 Arrive Jonesville i im ...nil " Union L 40 p in w " Slielt on 3 0f> p m y.1 Btrolher ? 31 p m u' Arrive ut Alston 4 07 jj in ni I.AVKKX8 HAI1.UO Al>. Leave Ifoloiin 4 10 p hi S1 Arrive at Laurens i\ )!... .* 7 '20 p in n( Leave l.nnrens C. II t> 15 a in" ?!l 1 Arrive ut Helena- ...12 25 pin !" j AUUKV1I.LK UKANCII. Leave Hodges 5 30 p in " Arrive at Abbeville 0 30 p in * Leave Abbeville 1130am J"' Arrive at Hodges 12 30 p m ^ Bt.t'K KI1H1K HAII.ItOAD ANI? ANDKKSON lilt ASCII. |? Leave Helton C 32 p in (j, Arrive Anderson..' 7 05 p in " Pendleton.- 7 43 p in I " Seneca < K 17 p in H J Xrrivc ut Wullialla 8 55 p in J ^ leave Walhalla ? 05 a in i. 1 a i-fifu . ill ! T Seneca Oily 5fl |> m 1 DO p ih " Central 10 :12 p in I 52 p ui \ Liberty 10 p III 2 1:5 p in '! Kaslcv 11 10 p in 2 27 pin J i (Jreeiivilli" r....... 11 42 p in 2 47 |i in .'! Spiiilmibmp /' ... I 01 a hi 3 50 |i in _! ^ (lastonia if 3 20 a in 5 54 p in 2 % i charlotte /< . 1 10 u in 0 -111 p hi I I Southintnl. No. 511* Xo. 52t 7 l.oiivc charlotte 11.) a in 1 00 p m 11 arrivctiastoniii .. 2 :>0 a in 1 45 p in j 7 Spalliiiilnirp . 4 28 a in 3 45 p hi 8 (Iroonville 5 43 a in 4 55 p hi ti Hartley 0 17 a in 5 20 p hi | a 1 " Liberty ti 34 a in 5 42 p in j 11 Contra) li si ft in ti (.0 p in j ^ Seneca city 7 33 a in 7 3 :14 a in S :10 p in i ' hula 10 00 n in 8 5W p hi Uniiiesrille . 10 30 a in 9 25 p in Atlanta 1 00 p in 1130am *Kxfiremi. + Mail. / ., Freight trains on this road all carry pnssen- V kci-s; passenger trains-run through In DanI Villc utitl connect witli Virginia Midland rail | way to all eastern cities, and at .-(Iluiita with I alj lilies diverging. No. at) leaves Iticliinond L | lit 1 p in anil No. 51 arrives there at 4 p in: 52 S leaves itiehinond at 2 28 a ill, 53 arrives there H: at 7 41 u in A HUtiJf'ef. SlccpiiHj Curs without I,< in(/e: On trains Xos. 50 anmunm> Bkiiki.kv, Snpt. ? M. SUnnjhtcr. (It?n. l'nss. Agt. Q A. h llivoH, 2d V. 1*. and (Jen. Man. ^ fcJOUTH CAROLINA ,r ? RAILWAY COMPANY. fotumvhcinp Sunday. Sept. 7th, 1884, nt 2 85* it, IVuaenjrer Trains will run as follows until further notice, "Eastern time;" j ( Columbia />irif'oii?Daily. , Leave Columbia 7 50 n in A 25 p in Li i?ue at? Chariest oil 12 20 p in V -17 p in L< Leave Charleston H HJ n in 4 :t0 p in A hue at Columbia .... .12 .18 p in 0 22 a m Cttvidtn Ditirion?Daily except Sundays. J'1 Leave Columbia 7 50 a m 5 25 p ni j'J line Camden .... 2 25 p in 8 25 p m I.eavu Canidon V 00 a in 4 00 p m / Due Columbia ... ..12 38 p m It 22 p in I A tri/iiotu JhriKion ? Duily. I IiC?Te 6'olninbiu. 7 50 a in 6 25 p in j ihtc Annual* . 120pm 7 40 a in / l.oavo Aiipusta ..... 7 15 a in Due Columbia .12:18 pm \ j Made *t Columbia with Columbia and Orcen\ ; till* railroad by train arriving at 12:18 p.m. , " I ?nd departing at 5 25 p. in.: at Columbia Sra Junction with Charlotte, Columbia and An- jJ( 5 mala railroad by same train to and from all A, r 3 joints on both road*. Al \ At Charlcaton with steamers for Xew York i \ ''iv Saturday: and on Tuesday and Saturday [J( \ *ith steamer for Jacksonrille nnd points on jr V Si. John's rlcer; also, with Charleston and A k.-f Savannah Kailroad to and from Savannah L. >nd all point* in Florida. ni If/ /At A(t/,u?t? with Ueorgia nnd Central rail p K rtada to And from all joints West and Smith: j B| M Black villi- to-and from all points on Darn- K ? *?ll railroad. Through tickets can be purIF .. fhjitcd to all points SrtHth and West br apply- t; .- '"d t? ni K?:** Sft.aI\M pm o j.'i " ... . LiuiesT".".# M ' i 1- " " . . S mo let* " (i AA " |m11 ,\r . \ (MUiiiiiiil I|V. ii .M? " (J !tl ' " ... Wiiiiisliurit " .'I 4S 44 43 ' " CliwliT " - J1 " ^ :i3 " Vi.rkvilK* . ... "t no ti " " .. Lancaster ... " .it oo " 00 Unck Mill .... 44 2 00 11 16 44 ... . ('Iiiii'liillo ... 41 1 0 0 44 <_ iii pm Ar... Newberry . . I.v II pin , " " . ...(irwiiwiuiil.'.... " 12 5'J 20 44 14 . . Liini'fiis '4 It 13 iiin '' 3S 44 4* Aiiilorsnn . .. 44 10 43 44 30 44 " (irccnville 44 11 53 " 16:1 " ... WiilliiiUii 44 it 00 14 no " *' . Abiicviiit* . -ii :;o ^ :17 44 " ... Spiirtiinhnrfr .. 4* 11 50 41 :io 44 41 ... llciiiU'i'sniiviilt' . 44 soo 44 " lid Trains between Charleston ami Cnlnin- w a. S. C. t] V. 1 > I \" IX ! :. T. M. KMKliSOX. (icn'l Siip't. (J i'ii" 1 I'as. A Rent. lOXl)KN'Si:i) TJMH OAIIO " ) Magnolia Passenger Ronte. ? In . flfoct September 14, 1S84. ( <11XI) SO I" Til. <) ( ronttu'nn/1 I'i '111 * < - I "" l?? () rrive Augusta ...11 Itll tun 8 50 pm ^ ave Augusta 10 :$0 am 9 00 |iin rrive Atlanta 5 45 pin t> 40 am t! yave Augusta 1140 am v rrive lieanfort i ill pm " J'cnt Hoval ti 05 jint " " Clialeston (i 50 pin " Savannah . ft 42 pin " Jacksonville 0 00 am " (illI NO NOKT1I. fl . ave Jacksonville 5 HO pm '| " Savannah 0 55 am " Charleston 010 am '' nve Port Koyal 7 25ntn c ' Mean fort. 7 117 am " Augusta 1 40 pin 11 >ave Atlanta +8 50 pin li rrive Augusta ti 10 am ave Augusta 4 00 pm 5 40 am rrivu (Jreenwood 'J 00 pm 11 .">0 am Tickets on sale at Greenwood to nil points /, thiough rates?baggage cheeked to desti- , ition. < 'Daily. tDailv, cxceut Snmlnv. p W. K. Siiki.i.man, Trnttlc Manager. tJ .1 N. Hash, Superintendent. ~ ~ f, 1'aUtanhuru and AS*UKV I IjLK HAILHOAD " On hlid nftcr May 12, 1884, pasdcujrer nins will be run dailv, except Sunday, be-, s ecu Spartanburg antl Ilcndcrsonville as Mows: 1 ' i P UP TRAIN. T :hvc II. Si !) Depot at Spartanburg 0 00 p m i| ?ve Spartanburg, A. I<. depot 0 10 p m :ave Snlndn 8 .r>0 p ni o jttve Flat Hock 9 I5 p ni * rrive Hcudersonrihe 9 30 j. ,n DOWN MH.flN. ti Mtrc IlenderHonville H 00 am ? . nve Flat Hock 8 15 am avo Saluda 0 00 a in c jovr --I ir Line Junction II 25 a m j rrivg H. ft D Depot Spnrtanburg II 30 a in ' Trains on thin road run by Air-I.ine time. d rtoCb trains uiakc connections f??r Columbia f, id Charleston via Sosrtanburg, Union and iilumbia; Atlanta and Chnrlijfrtc by Air Line. < JAMKS ANDKKSON. Superintendent. j, HITILMINGTON, COMniBIA and i " \/V AtriU'KTA RAII.KOAI). i Going Sou b No 48 Kit -10 ' cave Wilmington "9 30 p ni II 10 p ni tl rrive at Florence 1 50 a ni 2 20 a iii rriva at Columbia , 6 40'a m # ' Going North so'43 no 47 a cavc Columbia . 10 00 p in enve Florence t. . 4 50 p m 1 52 a iii ' rrivo at Wilmington 7 40 p m 6 10 a m j i rnui m>. ! > Mops in air stations. xos. 4H id 47 stop onlv at Hrinkley's, Whiteville, n IciniiiRton, Knir Hlnft', Marion, Florence, v iminor.sville, Sumter, canidcn Junction h'?r. Woodrow for the past L'venleen j'oars, and was taught by him i the seminary, I desire to make my L oble contribution to the elucidation of 01 liis subject. That Dr. Woodrow is a evont Christian and a diligent, hnmble u nd earnest student of the Bible, none an deny who. know him. Mis reverhi nee for the Iliblo, as the pure word of 1 lod, the childlike simplicity of his faith **' i all its utterances, the native honesty (t f his mind, his ability and candor in ealing with its difficulties from a scienlie point of view, his deep conviction 111 f the absolute truth of every word of lie llible?these are the impressions u rhich were made upon me while I sat 1 t hjs feet in the seminary, and these u nprcssions have only been deepened by II my subsequent knowledge of him. ' ls a man of science, Dr. Woodrow's I'putation for unquestioned ability is 0 oyond dispute by all competent judges, , hother in this country or in Kurope. 'his wonderful ability, however, has ol fn tm* l/il'irn nil nvlmit rtvnrcKfli^vti* ^ - 7 VT T d by his excessive modesty. The presnt scathing and searching ordeal Itrough which his "Address on Kvolu- 111 ion" is passing will afiord at least this '' ratilication to his friends?it will coinel him to show to the public something c* f those transcendent abilities which " ave hitherto been exhibited mainly to is students. Now when such a man?standing '* breast of the ablest Christian philos- M pliers of bis generation, endorsed, too, :> a greater or less extent in his views M y such men as Ash (.fray, Prof. Dana, " >r. Joseph LeConte and Prof. Drum- s lonil, of (ilnsgow?when such a man ives the result of his studies on ovolui'oii and its relation to the llible. is it not ^ rorthy at least of a respectful and dis assionate hearing ? When such an ininent Christian ami scientific expei t s Dr. Joseph LeOonte says: "I adopt ^ very \vor?l of Dr. Woodrow's address s my own belief,'' it would seem that a tliers should not hastily jump to the (inclusion?Dr. Woodrow has avowed ^ is belief in evolution, therefore he is ' oth u heretic and behind the times as a i t( ' K iiientist. Let me add just here in jnsice to Dr. Woodrow that he knows othing of my purpose to write this arti- V le ; it is the spontaneous prompting of t\ grateful heart, feeling that I owe him ai >r his instructions in the seminary a tl ebt which 1 can never repay. 2, In reference to the address it should t( e remembered that it clearly discrimi- T ales between that doctrine of evolution a hieh is atheistic and that which is (I licistic (preferably neither atheistic nor li lieistic), rejecting the former and adoptlg the latter as exhibiting (rod's plan g< f creation. t( lhither what Dr. Woodrow explicitly as _ . i /> i r in l Nil CVIMtlllUII, UCUIICU >21 y liini?which seems to him "tlx; only h no which can be given within the limits o f nntnra 1 science, necessarily excludes lie possibility of the? questions whether cl lie doctrine is theistic or atheistic, ci rhether it is religions or irreligious, |j loral or immoral." With him it is mom- a theistic, as the logical contradictory of /< theistic. It should be judged, tin.re- h ire. from this latter point of view, is 'his of itself is t valuable contradiction; n L enables the student to feel that to ac- t.< ept the doctrine of the address does '|' ot necessitate a renunciation of his be- n ief in Ood as the Creator and Preserver tl f all things. u It is further worthy of notice that a: kin doctrine of evolution is not contraictory of the 1'iblc. Or. "Woodrow's b osition is : Whatsoever contradicts the n lible is nccessarilv false: we need no ti irthcr proof of tho falsity of any state- n tent than that it is contradicted by tho K1 libit*. But then., before we apply -this 2< ummary process to any question in disutc, we should bo very suro thnt the tl tiblo does contradict it. Believing that tl lie Bible does not contradict the theory si f evolution, as held by him, ho main* '? tins that it may bo true; but whether p rue or false, it docs not aflfact in the d ast his faith in "the absolute inerran- si y" of tho inspired record. Tho Biblo H nys "tho l.ord God formed man of tho it! ust of the ground." The Bible there- ji are answers two questions : 1. Who p armed man ? uGod." 2. Of what ma- lr L*rial did Gt.d form man ? 4'Of the dust ? f the ground." If now we choose to e sk a third question : Of what sort of II ust, organic or inorganic, dio God form h inn ? Tho Bible in silent. Therefore a )r. Woodrow maintains that whatever 1 nswor natural s?ir>iir?n nnu rriur\ 41.5a i - - - J o- ' " " " I ? ' hird question, it cannot contradict tho tl lible, for the very obvious reason that tl >n any particular point, when the first s ritiiess neither nffirms nor denies, then I' rhother tho second- witness affirms or ti lenies, there can b? no conflict between y hem in that particular. This again nets ti he uiind of tho student at rest, for he t< icrcoives that whatever niuy be said of 1 rolution, whether lio believes it to be co iit? or false, lie is not required to uhate co le jot or tittle of his fiiitli in the plenary so spiratiou of (toil's word. \v< Let it be remembered that Dr. Wooil- ra w's address eon Hues the application of se le principles of evolution to the body fri * Adam, lie holds that the Scriptures \vi .> teach that the sunt of Adaiu was not th rolved, but that it was immediately wi euted by (Sod; find that the Loily of U' 'rc is not nn evolution by natural pro- lit 'ssi's, but a creation by the direet in- Hi (-position of the Divine hanik ICven it i respect to the evolution of Adam's tr udy he does not dogmatically and die- it torially assert that it is so beyond far- y< icr dispute, but. on the contrary, states se i few of the facts which w^yr.to be fo ifllcient at least to keep us from sum- en larilv rejecting the doctrine as certainly ag ilae." * * * '"cannot be lightly and ur )iitemptupusly dismissed," * * * cl many good grounds for believing that st rolution is true in these respects." tr Another distinction which Dr. Wood- tv )w signalizes is that distinction between le Bible and science coiitnufictiHtf dt ?ch other, and the Bible and science fl rtf teaching the same thing. Many are w isposed to think that if science teaches th ne thing and the Bihie does not. teach lc le same thing then we have conflict, lit hey demand that the law which regu- hn ites the connection between science D id the Bible shall be the law of har- fu tow//. Dr. Woodrow maintains that il? ?v? ivguiii'.lic l IIIU law Ul Htm- illl jntradiction. This latter is again an of ivalnablc aid to tin* student of tin* th ible in connection with science. It st ives him from running to the Bible kcry time there is a cry of conflict, to nc ?e whether or not he can torture tlie n< oly text until lie can extort from it Ih >nie expression, which teaches the w line thing as science ; and having done sc ), lie must wait in anxious suspense, st science should a {in in change her dt mfession, when he will be under the so iiinful necessity of ay ft in subjecting CI le Bible to the rack and the thumb- w Tew. But 1 >r. Woodaow's students, hi faithful to the principles instilled into pi icin in his chus-room, are saved from tli II this persecution of the Word of Cod ; w id not even the ij/iosl of a conflict to;- tli veen scieneo and the Bible can by any bi nssihilitv disturb them iu their studies !a I the inspired page from Uxu jtrxt chap r of Gates fx to the closing word of vi ovulation. gt This law of wow-contradiction I)r. W ? ITT > oodrow maintains arises mainly from . vo facts: 1. The two books?Nature ^ nd the Bible?are both the product of ic same Almighty .Spirit of truth. tt . The absolutely wow-scientific charac- ' r of all the contents of Holy Scripture. ^ his law is confirmed by the results of II previofts so-called conilicts between le IJible and scicttce. So far as in him es he will not let his students forget alileo, or how not only astronomy, but L'ography and geology, have combined > teach us this lesson. First there was iserted conllict, truth of science and 'U dsitV of Ri'V?>l?tinii (linn ntimiiolx.l " - el aruiony ; then recognition of the law f /joH-contradiction. sc Prof. Woodrow was put in tho Perkins linir in our( seminary to teach "the vnnec/ion between science and Ueve- ^ ition." Shall we now turn him out as e> heretic because ho teaches that the ^ tir which regulates the "connection (j( ctween science and revelation" is the iiv of /joy/-eontradietion ? If this will ^ ot suit, will tho Church have him to ach that it is the law of contradiction f jM his would be heresy, indeed sheer in- cc delity ! What then ? Shall he teach jat it is the law of harmonyt IIoiv ill this teaching square with geography, itronoinv and geology ? oj Is it not .self-evident that there must ja o some law which regulates tho "conection" between science and Revela- j>0 ) 1 *1 ? .1 1 ? ' * uji ; ;in(i iiiiu ui'.s ia\v must do toil ml ?? Cfl nder ono or other of those throe cateories, viz : 1st. A"o?)-contradiction, or pr il. contradiction, or 3d, harmony t cfl Now it seeing that his critics demand ml he shall maintain tho third. If so, j len cither (1) thero must bo some :andard outside of Nature- and of Hove- ^ ition with which tho two must be coma rod, in Ardor to show tho harmony or /.vharmony ; or (2) Nature must bo as- ^ nmod ns tho standard by which to judge j evolution ; or (J$) Revelation must be fisunied us tho standard by which to idgo Nature. The Jtrst is clearly imossible?no such standard exists. The iw of harmony, according to the'iecond, fu ould compel us to find tho doctrino of di volution in tho Bible, or reject tho ni Uhle ns raise. liiit tins is exactly what it is critics declare is not in the Biblp, ci nd yet they assort that tho Bible is.true, hi 'he law of harmony, according to the t hird, would compel us to say, since nt lie doctriuo of evolution i* not taught in c< lie Bible, ergo is not taught in natural J'.1 cience. This is exactly the position 'rof. Woodruw's critics wish him to ff ike. But what is this in its hist anal- vi sis but tho Church a$ Churoh under- n liking to teach scienoe, and to dictate ^ d her officers "what they are to believo" o bo true science ? Xo\y has sho any a] mmissio-.i to tench science? What 11 Itl she do, for instance, with the ; ionce of astronomy if site insists that J 2 shall go to the Bible to got ournatu1 science, as well as our theological ionco, mill that having first obtained Din the Bible our science of astronomy, e must then go to Nature to find there e same science of astronomy ? This ould be the law of harmony! Dr. oodrow rejects it: he tells us there is , > natural science, of astronomy in the bio ; it is a waste of time to search for where it is not: if you would find the . no religion, search for it where alone is to be found, in the Bible ; but if ' m would find the true astronomy, arch for it.where alone it is to be und, in the stars. So, too. in referice to geology, he constantly cautions ;ainst studying geology where no nat- ' ' al science of geology is?in the Jirst j ^ lapter of Genesis; if you desire to udy geology, search for it where alone I ue geology is to bt found?in the f rlh. Is it not manifest that if harmony is 'uiandcd as the regit lit ti ce law and the ' ible is claimed as the standard by hieh that harmony is to be judged, | en we must first go to the Bible to = j am science and then go to nature to id there the same science which we ivo already deduced from the Bible ? id not this course produce the shatno1 conduct of the Church toward (Jal?o ? Is it not. therefore, proved to bo , i unsound principle ? ICrgo, the mind . I'rof. Woodruw, severely trained by e accuracy demanded in scientific times, rejects it. The law ?>f harmony, therefore. will j >t do. The law of row//v/-dirtion will |' )t do, as is self-evident. A'n/o, the \v of Hojj-eontradictiou is the only law liicli regulates the connection between ience and revelation. It seems, then, that Prof. Wood row is >iiig exactly what he was put in the ! miliary to do, and exactly what the liurch ought to desire him to do. Shall e, therefore, for these things, denounce ! ui as a heretic, remove from him his 'ofessorship, and so repeat the folly of e .seventeenth century ? And all for hat? liecauso, forsooth, lie teaches J' hi nn: regulative ia\v 01 me connection 1 ^ iIwoon science ami revelation is the w oi' non-contradiction ! It semis clear that the Bible,-in Cten. 1 i : 7, "formed man of the (lust of the 1 ound,'.' leaves it an open question liether the expression, "dust* of the ;! ound," is intemled to mean organic or j organic dust, and it seems equally ear that no oilier passage of Seripture ils in the solution of this question. If i. then tlii< nnnelimi > ? I 1 (ho case, must belong to that-scicncc j i host* proper study is the investigation : tliis very subjoct, viz : matter?dust j organic or inorganic. If this l?e so. ien is not any attempt to settle then testiou of organic or inorganic dust by ,o Bible a persistent effort on my part invade the sphere of science? And n I not attempting to violate the regutive law of non-contradiction and to jforcc the law of harmony ? IJut if so, ay I not expect both the Hible and lienco to rebel against me and refuse to vc tne aid or comfort ? i Hut if all these things are so. then in < ie present aspect of the question of 'olution as to man, I am not callcd >oii 10 say mat i oeneve 11 or mat I ; ) not believe it. As a scientific qties- i i>n it is still under discussion. As to i io final settlement of it as an accepted jctrine of science, I can afford to be ofoundly indifferent so far as I am mcerned as a student of the Jiiblc. or shall I concern myself to settle the j lestion whether "dust" in Gen. ii : 7 oans organic or inorganic dust, by way ' getting my Hible in readiness for the test conclusions of science, for this is qu >tion for the scientist to settle, not r nif\ If science shall find that man ime from dust?inorganic, all right ; y liible savs it was dust; and if sci?ce shall finally eoncludo that man iino from dust?organic, still all right; y Bible says it was dust, without sayg whether that dust was organic or in- ; ganic. And so when this question is ually settled I shall hail it ux n renewed >monstrntioo of that which I'rof. Wood>w tm.ght mo in Columbia Seminary, ie law of non-contradiction. S.? shall learn from tho past a lesson for the iture. Jamks L. Martin. Iteuiecly l'or Poison Oak. I camo across tho following very uboil rocipe in the Medical Record a few lys since, and give it for tho henuiit of any who know what a dreadful thing Is to get poison oak on you. Tho spefic for this poison has been found to be romide. Df. 8. A. Brown, of tho Unid States Navy, states that ho used it in ; loast forty cases with unvarying sucjss. Take from ten to twenty drops of romide to an ounce of olivo oil", cosmono or glyeorine. Rub tha mixture untly on tho affected parts three or nit* tinina n Anv 'I'Kn Krnn>iiK\ .? 'Ml .CMIVU f A ?IU WI Vllllliu 13 OU olatile thnt the solution should bo reeved overy twenty-four hours. Tho ruption novot extends after tho first venty-four hours, and promptly disnp['ftrn wiiliiu. twenty-four hours if the [ plication is parsistvd in.. A GAY IjOTHAKIO. \ SonnnKioiial "Wedtlinjt?A Dcliidrd | Youiij*- liiitly?A Missing (irooni. j About the middle of duly two young nou came from Augusta, (in., and openid nn agency in Newberry for the llouselobl nnd the Domestic Sowing Machines, inder the partnership title of Mus;rovo ^ Williams?the partners being I Musgrove and .1. .1. Willinms. l'hey were stangers to the people here : md appeared to be doing well and were j ivell thought of, and Mr. Musgrove still s, though recent developments have jreatly chnngcd the estimnte placed up. >n the other man. Williams has been L)onrdingof late with Mr. 1>. S. dohusou. who lives just outside of the corporation i :>n the western side of the tovn. Miss! Annie .Southern a young lady of ('oluui- J bin, about seventeen years old, has been visiting Mr. Johnson's family, (to whom she is related,) for several weeks, lleing ?|uite pretty and attractive she ivns a favorite with the young men of Newberry and received from them a ;ara(ion'K for (lio State I'rtir. The regular meeting of the Hoard of Trade was held last night. President I'earce. on behalf of the Fxeeutive Comini'toe on the State Fair, reported that he had appointed Messrs. David Jones, ('. .J. Iredell and N'. \V. Trump on the committee. They had held one meeting and had corresponded with.I. F. Buchanan of Reeve's hand, as well as with Mr. Reeves, with reference to procuring that hand for Fair week. There was every reason to helieve that the band woa.>ld be engaged, as favorable negotiations were in progress, in which President Duncan of the State Agricultural Society was also participating. President I'earce also stated that lie had corresponded with live electric. light compai'ies, and had just received the address of another company to which he would also write, with the view of having electric lights at the State House and at the Fair Grounds during Fair week. There would be at least one company represented at the Fair, and it was probable that the exhi hition of the electric lights here would result in a permanent benefit to the exhibitor. The indications point to a larger and r better exhibition, attended by an increased number of visitors, than any previous Fair, and preparations had been made, and would be further made, for a grand dis?play of the industrial aiid agricultural resouces of the State. Till. iti/M-nnc.* in flw* 1* . ..V ...V1VH.1U HIV VAIIIUIIIUII Ul IIVU sto?*k would he great. Preparations for the accommodation of immense numbers of visitors had been entrusted to a competent committee, who would discharge their duties* faithfully and successfully. In the matter of illuminations, President 1'earee said that large numbers of Japanese lanterns would be used at the State House, Fair (irounds and other prominent places If the contributions of the citizens should be as liberal as last year, tin? committees would be enabled to make a better show ami entertain the visitors more pleasantly than had ever been done before. It would appear from the action ol" the Hoard of Trade that it is proposed to have night entertainments at the Fair Grounds, which will ho h iww feature.?Columbia Iteyixfcr. THK WOOLFOI.K SUIT. The C?hc in Aiken County and How it wiik lleeided ?'The l*elnt Overruled and (lie Case to he Appealed. The case of the Woolfolk heirs against the tlraniteville Manufacturing Company, which was tried in the Court of General Sessions in Aiken on Monday, and which was concluded hy a verdict fur defendants, has attracted considerable attention. The issue involved the i.?ir .u.. 1 possessed by the Grnnitcvillo Manufacturing Company. The counsel representing the plaintiffs were Mefsrs. Abnev & Al>noy, Croft & Dunlap, .1. E. Bacon, A. II. Alfriend and .0. C. .Ionian; for the defense, Messrs. Henderson Bros.. Samuel Lord and .1. I*. Cloy. The defendants regard the verdict as a virtual termination of the suit, and consider the matter irrevocably settled in favor ol* the company. On the other hand the heirs, we understand, will appeal the caso to tho Supreme Court. They say that the court ruled out a certain deed nn a legal technicality which constituted an important link in the plaintiff's chain of titles, .-miI Hint by their own motion they thereupon directed a verdict to Iw taken against them, with the lijiht of appeal to the Supreme Court. On this anil upon other points made during the progress of the trial, objection was made. The error complained of in this important ? link consisted, they allege, in the ruling upon the point thai u deed was probated liy a .1 iistice of the Peace in (reorgiu, tho defendants claiming ll.iit it should have been probated by nn ofHoer in South Carolina. Tho Judge ruled against tho plaintiffs on this point-, and the casogocM to the Supreme Court. ? A Hgu$t(i Chronicle. Cooking an an Art. The man who presides over Iho kitchon in a first-class hotel is an absolute monarch. Nobody ventures to question his acts, and even his employers make their feeble suggestions in a deferential way. The modern eAc/is an artist as well as a student, and for his nso is provided a library filled with all tho standard works upon his art. Hero ho consults his authorities and plana bis campaigns of gastronomic conquest. In the kitchen are subordinates of many grades who look np to Tiim with awe. The c/ief of n leading hotel in New York lately admitted a reporter to his inner sanctum, and there confided to him the great secret of tho cooking art.. This, it appears, is tho making of sauenx. "Everything in its raw state,*' says th& oraole, "has a distinctive taste, but the \*v ' iMiik'it art i?t (a lirinrr i| (a Ih'n ? un v^>5Ehj that it readies the palate. The Kcdret ill our profession U to supply flavors - . where they are absent and develop thorn , when they aro there, just as tho painter V:'-'. makes his effect stand nut from tfu* can- . ; v; , van."?/i-inloit ifetiiUf, ' - . .'.J, -u ' w ... '