" ' ? " " ' ' * ' ?*.aa~E-- ? FROM THE NATION I L INTt J.LIOEflCEE. "WADDY THOMPSON'S VIJ5WS ON AN NEXATION. Messrs. Gales 6c Sevtox:?In an adders which i recently made u> iba Whigs of AJIxujy, made souse remarks in relation to the late treat; for tin* annexation uf Texas to the United States A misrepresentation, (no doubt resulting from i misunderstanding) of tW*e remarks, makes it pro Cr, in my judgment, that I should no longer with Id the public expression of tuy opinions upoi that subject, and it u due to rayselTthat I rhoijli ?* at the same time giro the reasons for those opin ions. In the speecl^f made at Albany, I ex piTwcu uv v|iimuu ujiyu ino question oi UIUI1MU annexation, not because 1 thought that my viewi of tnat subject would be disagreeable to tbe audi enoe which I was addressing, but tor exactly th? opposite reason. 1 preferred to discus* this sub jeel before a southern audience, where differed opinions were entertained, and whore it was posaible that some good might be done. No individual in the United States has more motives of c personal character than 1 have to advocate the ira mediate annexation of Texas to this country. 1 Was the first man who, on tlie floor of Congress .expressed bis sympathy in the Revolution of Tex -as. It was an amendment offered by me to th? appropriation bill in March, 1837, which securec too recognition of Texas by our Government?i measure at that rime of vita) importance to the -voting Republic. Circumstances have since placed H In my power to give many other and substantial proof* ui aiy {Yumdly ti'r hags both to Texas snd .the Texan*; and I am proud to know that no liv ing man has a stronger hold upon the gratitude and affection of the people of 'lexas than I iiave; .and, I will add, that there are pecuniary considerations, (to me not unimportant,) wbicli would make the annexation of Texas eminently desirable to me: yet, with all these motives to a different conclusion, I have not been able to change my opinions upon the subject. These opinious have not been hastily formed,, but have ripened into I fixed and settled convictions. 1 am opposed to tbe annexation, because, in the language of Judge Upshur, "it would injure their chief agricultural interest (that of the South,) by 'raising up a powerful competitor; " and it would flKntinpn tKo nrinn *U-. ? , - r..vv >/ WIIVII, IUC J."I Illl-IJNJLI ?w material." Now these considerations may have great weight with the manufacturers of the North; they have exactly the opposite effect with me as a Southern man and a cotton planter. Will such lie the effect of the measure! That it will be* no one can doubt who is acquainted with the unequalled advantages of Texas as a cotton growing country* 1 do not hesitate to say?-and do so on no light authority?that if the most skillful cotton planter were to ask of Heaven a country for the growing of that staple, that he nvould ask no single advantage that is not found in Texas. There are millions of acres there which will produce from 2,500 to 4,000 pounds of cotton to the acre. As a provision country, it is at least equal to any portion of our Western country, and it is more healthy than any other cotton growing region in the world. It is true, that there are some portions of the United States where, in favoruble years, a hand can make as much cotton as he can gather, but here presents itself an inappreciable advantage which Texas possesses, which is this: from the month of February, when the cotton is planted, until the middle of July, when it is matured, there are constant showers; and from July until the middle of December, ih ordinary years, .there is no rain at all; thus affording five months of .uninterrupted urond fn>- ?? -1 i -v. cuuiciiii^ vi1c ~r crdp. The cotton w therefore unDnned, end ita staple is also better than that of American cotton. I am perfectly satisfied that a judicious investment in a cotton plantation in Texas will yield, besids all necessary for family consumption, from eight to ten percent, profit per annum at the price of three cents per pound for tho cotton. In confirmation of these views, it is only necessary to say, that evon now, with all tho insecurity of property in Texas, many of tho best planters in the South-west are removing their property there. I know myself that two gentlemen who own the very best plantations wluch I have seen in Alabama and Florida, have abandoned in & great degree their estates and removed their hands to Texas. A distinguished advocate of the measure estimates that in a very short time, two hundred thousand negroes will be removed to Texas. The most of these will be taken fiom the old States, where they do not produce one thousand pounds of cotton to the band, and carried to Texas where they will average five thousand pounds to the hand. To which may be added a large number Of slaves and white laborers, now employed ip other branches of agvioolture, which will atilI more increase the production of cotton. Ts % wise in us thus to stimulate the production of our great staple now, when tho adjustment of the demanc ana supply is trembling in the balance, and whei ?U the indications are that this adjustment will b< most disasterous to the cotton planter, and not t< t lie cotton planter alone, but to the value of alavi labor, and of ncctssoij wnumjuencc" tb' the exis tence of slavery! I presume that 110 one will de ny that cotton cannot continue to be raised ii the old States at three or four cents thu pound nr.d I know of nothing else that con he substitute) for it. Slaves will then become an incumbranc* which wc shall be glad to be rid of; and I confes for myself, it will afford me very little consols ?tr?n in riding over rt?> fields, grown up in broon * 'sedge and washed into gullies, to be told that tb -institution of slavery -still exists and is prosperou in Texas. I believe that slavery is in no sense ai evil-?that the African is not only more contente< - mnyqfm mrw nlmajr' ??'n?li?rt. mkI i more moral, religious, and virtlious in the condj tion of domestic slavery than in any other, but 1 <1 most confidently believe that the only allernativi of that condition is vice, idleness and debauchery .ultimately leading to barbarism; but I confess thu mv nkilun?V***/*nw ?? " - - ?v r...wn?^ ? uui >u c&|Niii9ivc as to sncrmct everything to its perpetuation elsewhere, even i such would lie the effect, which I do not l>eliave My pat iotism is in some degree geographical, ant the first object of ray solicitude, love, and devo lion is the country ill which I was born. It muy he said that if ull this is true, Texa will supercede us in the production of cotton whether annexed or not, and that we seuld avai ourselves of the present only opportunity of ac tmiriinr it. To wlii*?K I ?"?l? #*.? :r : ^ T_, e- **J $ H1?*V ll ICXBfc I nettled without any adventitious adventitious sti nuiient lieing given to such settlement, in the in aroused demand lor cotton, may keep pnee wit! the increasing supply. Cotton in large quantitio can only he made by slave labor; all exporienei proves this. These slaves can only be carried t< Texas from the United States, and as long so TexSS is a separate government, although inoivid itsls may remove there, a feeling of plriuo in, ant affection for his country, in the heart of every American, will prevent moat of our people frorr yielding to the temptations which are held out tc them to abandon their country. But once make Texas a portion of that country, and extend oul glorious nag over it, and such a tide of emigration has never lw?fore been witnessed as will set in that direction. It seems to me therefore, thai 0 co stimulate the prod action of cotton beyond fli? ^ penihility ot' consumption, tiecanse the supply tmy po??ibly: without *ucli sritnnlus. exceed thr , demand, would lw as uuwi?o a? it would lie tc ?? . .1 I II. ! ! - f II ?! girve Wf an ounce of arsnic to ft friend bdfcause we supposed thot we had discovered the signs of * incipient coueftwption. ) have never yet hoard any satisfactory answer a to these views. i have anxiously sought to have 1 1 thuin answered; fur it is painful to me to Hnd f myself opposed to an almost universal popular 1 i, opinion in the South upon this subject. It is a still more puiuful to me to oppose, almost "solita. ?y aud alone/' the opinion of the patriotic and - honored State to which it is my pride to t?elong. d Nothing Would havo been moro agreeable to me I man to rtoU myself once more agreeing in opinion I . 'upon great questions of public policy with the ma jority of that State.. During an angry and excited t p*rty conflict for the last sevon years, 1 have been ? treated by that mojorily with so much kindness,. that I tvonld gladly have made ary sacrifice to I the general opinion of the State which I could J ? hate done consistently with a sense of duty. A I- < i, though 1 am not one of those "whoso thoughts 1 ' keep the roadway," only because it is the road?; way, I trust that I am just as far above the paltry i vanity of an ostentatious independence of the gen> oral public opinion of those amongst whom ray [ lot has been cast. 1 have been told that all these , views may be correct, but that there are impor- . tant political considerations which outweigh them. , 5 When I have asked that these might bo stated* 1 I have only been answered with such broad genorali ities, cabalistic phrases, and party catchwords as i these: "Thnt it is a question of security and ax1 isteiK'e to the Sooth." I was not converted to , the defunct sub-Tre^Sury humbug hy brttlg told I that it was a question of "deliverance and liberty," when I thought that I saw, as all mush* aow see, that the ruin and desolation which it caused every where, was greatest at the South. Every where else the agony is over; at the South it is scarcely begun. Nor can 1 support another measure, even H more disastcmus, without more intelligible or more sufficient reasons. I am firmly persuaded that the certain and inevitable tendencies of the annexation of Texas are to promote the abolition of slavery; more so, Indeed, than any other measure which has heretofore been proposed. Nor 1 am I without support in this opinion from distin- < guished advocates of the measure. J\lr. W llktns, the present Secretary of War, hold? the following language in hi* address to his 1 former constituents: "The division between tlie planting and farming districts is marked by the best natural boundaries, and no edict of man can change it. There is neither necessity nor excuse for extending slave- i labor beyond the alluvial districts bordering on the Gulf ana the lower Red river, nor can it ever be so extended by law. The rich lands of this region, running three degrees further south thnn the best sugar lands of Louisiana, must always be settled, if annexed by u population whose interests * wilt bo American. "This section of Toxas, which must chiefly bo 1 a sugar growing region, and therefore identified 1 with that portion of Louisiana now engaged in i the sauie culture, will unite in supporting the i great principto of extending full and adequate pro- ' lection to American products and industry. Su- ' gar is a crop which must always look to the home < market for the surest sale and most certain return. ' We shall thus gain in the south-West ? ppwerful accession of strength upon that graft question which so deeply involves the intents of your ii trict. I candidly believe 4 it v ouh not be long before a majority of the people ol he 'outli, when their Uhnr ia rlma ?^ ? . .? M**vi%vw I?iw inoujr Ulllt'reni channels, will bccoino convinced of the sound pol- I icy of protecting and fostering American industry. This will not only^^Jmportan^ju^j^sc^je^n * luted to t ?a result to be hailed with gladness by every f patriotic breast. i "1 am no advocate for slavery, nor do I wish t to sec it introduced into one section, unless I were < at the same time assured that it would withdraw ) it from another, and that without increasing it iu I the aggregate. The annexation of Texas must soon be followed by the voluntary abolition of the institution of slavery in our neighboring States, Virginia, Maryland, Delaware; and also indeed in Kentucky and Missouri. We can all truly rejoice in its withdrawal from our own immediate vicinity. 1 am satisfied that the best interests of that class of our fellow-beings, originally brought to, and forced on these States by British rapacity and injustice, and who must always bo a marked and distinct race as long as they abide among our i own people, will be best consulted by securing the only hope which has ever presented itself for their acquiring an independent home, or attaining ' a position elevated ana equal to the people a midst whom they dwell. Such a reluge is ofTer[ ed beyond the Rio Bravo, among the Mexican n?nl AjBArieiin notmnc l.oio. t dice either to caste or color." I Mr. C. Ingersol, another leading advocate of 1 measure, thus speaks on this branch of the mea* ? sure." > "Angry protests against Texas, elicited by rep* a minointimia issued as- Wmliingtuti, predicate sltt very as the abhorrent evil to be increased by an nexation?assuming the egregiously fulse position n thut more and aggravated slavery is to follow that , event. But three-fourths of that fine region are i upland, with soil and climate adapted to agricule ture and pasturage, where cotton and sugar will s not thrive, and slave labor cannot be employed progtably. Three States without slaves, and onn ly one with them, cun be formed there; and such, e your committee understand, is the wish of the s present inhabitants of Texas. Slavery, forbid by n nature, may be interdicted by organic law there; 1 and the annexation, instead of increasing the pow nf representatives of slavcrv in the IJmon will glotithc contrary, certainly and greatly diminish Btheir relative weight. The Sinfes of uoutsiafiXT ' a Alabama, Georgia, Carolina, Mississippi, Arkan , sas, Missouri, and Tennessee may suffer by det preciation of their lands and other property. Vir9 tfinia, Maryland, Kentucky, the Carolinas, and f Tennessee, if not all the slave-holding States, wi.l have their slaves drawn off to the fresher and 1 more fruitful plantations of Southern Texas. In - a few years, many of them must become five States, and thus Texas prove the means of uniting s a largo portion of the present slave-nolding parts i, of the union in interest, sentiments, and action ,1 with the North at d West; whore slavery is unb known and disliked. s The most important exportable product of the ! United States, the regulator of thoir exchanges ii ' w iuiu uonc oi union?-cotton?cannot be profitably It cultivated without slaves; nor can sugar or rice.? u Yet looking forward to the providential era when a slavery may exist no longer in parts of the United > States, to the diminution of its need, and ultimate ? extinction, Texas is the only land of promise * where philanthropists who are not zealots, can deI scry the theatre of that consummation. Mexico r has no slaves, because her population of the white, l black, and rod races is blended. In her neigh? borhood and near, if not with her people, the colt ored inhabitants of this country may be united eventually in national numbers, with the strength the character, and the institutions of an indepen: dent people. That national combination may be t accomplished without revolution or commotion^? ( An African nation may arise, the descendents of Moorish, other African and Indian progenators ? with the improvements of fioe governments in> I grafted in their sovereignty. Instead of eternizimi m- .. a-i,-. i nftlHi... o-w ing slavery, aim consideration of its connel^M with tho l>ulH*.l States encourages the hojKJ th^H may end in Tex?4?peucetully aud gratefully dSt appear there. b*>?riu, Canada, Huyti, abyjiyjmi of slavery in tke slfcvc-holding States, all schemes of either uniting wfiites with blacks, or separating thorn in the same communities, without the degradation of the Macki* often worse than their bondage, huve proved Abortive. The vision of slavery's euthaitusy by ~fur^Hocation to the soathern parts of Texas and *V>rtlers of Mexico may be delusive?-but it promises more to ratioual humanity iimn ar^y omer pn^vct yet suggested. At all events, tlie umiexeth'n of Texas cannot but tend to diminish the alleged evil and powers of slaveholding" a| f* 1 agree in nearj# all of the views expressed that distinguished %rfrker as to the effect* of tint measure, which I Am understood. But Uie ullocation of the euUifpuiy requires a hay. Are noi thore startling viofcl Are they not enough al least to induce S&hern men id pause and reflect before they rush Adlong into a measure of such porteotious imporfcoe, with more procipitatioti and less discussiowban were ever knows in a measure of equal Aiagnitudef Mr. Walker, ? southern man, has In Wished a letter upon this subP?V It is divided lpfa different heads: Ono oi which is the follofljugi Admitting Ten/Lccuret the Extinct ion of Slavery.?Is slavery, Mi, never to disapj>eur from the Union t If coafluJt within its present limits, I dc not perceijrc when W how it is to terminate. It is true, Mr; t>eorge W?ch<*ri the uisiin^uliliril Virfinian, and proles-sdr in tlieir great university, has cinonstrated that, iff |M?riod not exceeding eighty vears. and nmhublw 1m. frnm ?Vn> ^?na!t< r x""?vmr?i ?? v? fvru lation in all the sla) (holding States, hired lauoi would he as abum.li t and cheap as slave labor, and that all yccuni y motives for the continuance of slavey would th a have ceased. But ^would it, tkcrtfore, then i sappear 1 No, certainly would not; ior,attl i lowest ratio, the slaves would then numbr*? leai ten millions. Could such i mass be emancipate I t And,'if so, what would b? the result t We I ive seen by the census and other proof, that on sixth of tho free blacks must be supported at the public expense; and that, a the low rate of $50 ?qch, it would cost $80,000, 000 nor annum to \m raised by taxation, to suppor the free blacks, thcfcjn -the Booth requiring sup port, namely, l,66tft66, if manumission wore per mitted ; but as such a tux could not bo collected emancipation would be, r.s it now is, prohibited bt law, and slavery cutald not disappear in this man ner, even when it iecaine unprofitable. No, tci millions of free blows permitted to roam at l*rg< in the limits of the South could never be tolerated Again, The question is asked. Is slavery nevei to disappear from the Union] This a startling and momentous qudtfion ; but the answer is easy and the proof is cle^r; it will certainly disajtpcat if Teeas i* rtanntxed to the Union; not by aooli lion, but, against, and f accomplishing that object. But 1 do not think jo, but believe, on the contrary, that it would be injurious, deeply injurious, and in the end, des tructive to the slaves themselves, disastrous to the whole Union, and absolutely ruinous to the South Holding these opinions, my object is not to postpone this result ftp a short time, hut to prevent it lor ever.. Will any one deny any of these propositions : 1. That the taoo eflficncious measure in fuvoi of abolition, would he to destroy the value of slave lubor I ? 2. That the reduction of the price of cotton tr three or four dfiKs would destroy the value ol slave labor in the old sluve States ? 3. That any ljtr^e increase of the quantity of cotton produced) vould have the effect to reduce its price to that j>oint, or even lower; say, lot example, a suddpn increase of five hundred thousand hales ^ " j 4. That tho ifrnexation of Texas would caus< such an increffCte production 1 Much the l>Vtr portion of the produce of slav< labor is cottof^ h ? the price of cotton whicl regulates oxcl^irvl^r the value of slaves, as of al ...wv uici v uuwi aniens iiCl 11 DC DOrUC 111 HI!lid too, that Texas it admirably adapted to tho pro ductioo of Sugftr, long staple Cotton, and Tobacci the only OthSt" STtWw, With tb* o Tllco; wtrtctttB^prodaccJ by slave labor. But if the price of tfUon is not ruinously reduced hi over production, it will not be denied that slavt labour c?r. bv-^wployed in Texas with at leas twice the profit which it viclds in the average o the slave States of the Union. Cur slaves wil then be carried to Texas by the ibrce of a law ai fixed and certain as that by which water finds it level. The sWes will very soon disappear fron Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee and Kentucky. >nd in a period very short lor sue! an operation, those States will become non-slave holding Stages; and whenever that is the case they will npfc only no longer have a common in rarest with t*l>e remaining slaveholding States b defend the institution, but will vow .~r* ? -v of that fan?gtal spirit of a false philanthropy whicl is now perya cling the whole worhl. Thus shal wc loso tha niost important of our allies; moi important in numerical strength at the hnllot box still more important if we should be driven to tin cartouch l?^x a&onr last defence. And wlrtM an? the advantages which wc arc t< gain by this measure 1 I mean we of the slave holding Stttes. Are we more secure against for eign attach 1 The question is not whether Louis iana will he more secure with Texas than withou it I think it easy to demonstrate that such wouh not he thdease. Hut the real question is, wil Texas thfn l?e a portion of our Union, and w< shall be aider the same obligation to protect Tex as as we?re now to protect Louisiana. Withou railroadopind risers, wo ean assemble three hun died tlifme.uul men in thirty days in Now Orleans oral aniother point in the slaveholding .State? I (( 'ohtinned oo Viml pope,) StikUit, >V<( oii?i?tuiR oP mt^oFthe hrtfcW# t&wfcfty called! with Medicines, ?&c., ut lb? lowest Oa*h, pricow. J .. ....? - * ^ P. 8EAY. QAlLj^WfcHAVlNG CBEUM^orw^e bv 8FA?^ fj* AY LOITff BA LB AM'?' ? ^LDRIDGKS IlAI.M ok COLUMBIA***,preparation VJ for Uio hair, for ede by WM?B?fcAV. iy ; ^^STOR JJI i.,~Sweo 17jj I, g^bit^qfjurli 11All jjf gnw^rtgr, B?ic Water, Lomoa Syrup, ^L^opiitv, L" AUDANUM.Twgoric, ChtnomoaT IVp^eai?i..t, Lebmmi, Bnrpunot, Nitm, Hartshorn, Carminative, Rate i man's Drop*, Godfrey* Cordial, &x- &c.for**ip jp?OrPMlA8, Mwider, Iiocwvod, Caw Wood, Red Son- j v> den, Red Lead, Dry White I-ead, Chrome Green, . Chrome Yellow, Vermillion, Prussian Blue, Litharge, Spa, nish Brown. 8n. Whiting, Yellow Ochre, Patty, Glue, Su-. 4-c., for sale by WILLIAM B. 8EAY. ly . CONFECTIONARY. ; ?l:&' WATCHES! WATCHES! f A Few very fine Gold and Silver Lever Watehes, and plain Watches; Kovs, Kings, ?frc., which Would he old extremely low for Cosh, or good Notes on short time, I for sole by WILLIAM B. 8EAY. ly I ..DEAFNESS. T\|t McNAtB'8 ACOU8TJC OIL.?those ATENT MACHINE SPREAD StrmJiMsbl (Iff Pimm. I ! JL ten?for Mle by WM. D. SKAV. Uih">-ly f Tlieabo* e ioT?liwbl? Medlchici lire for mile I?y Wm. B. Seny,.Spartanburg, C. II. ; Crenshaw Sc. Adicks, Yorkvflle v llwimley Harris Sc. Co. Chester t J. McMaster, Wiaaesboro'; J. 8. Swindler, Newberry, Win. IUbe, i Laurens. Spartanburg C. H., Mey 15,1844. ly UST RECEIVED? Muriatic Acid, Acetic Acid, Tartaric Acid. Rochellc Salts, Aqua Fortis, Aqna Ainonia. Wine of Colchicum, Mar Amount. Bole Armenia. ' Sweet Sp. Nitre, Balsam Tola,Caunnde Balm in. 1j Conserve of Botes, Gum Camphor, Hyde. Popish. Quinine do Sulphate, Lunar Caustic. Corrosive Sublimate, Red Precipitate, CnmOniac. Cmton Oil, Pulve. Arsenic, Oil Bergamot. Oil Lavender, Oil Orange, Oil Sasafrns. rj. ; , % Liquorice Ball, Rotten Stone, Scotch SnufT. ? Mc Alioy SnnfF, Shaving Soap, Toilet Soap, f Wafers per or., Turpentine Soap. Crane Yellow, Lamp Black. < Together with many other articles, for sale bv WM. B. 8F.AY. t Spartanburg, May 29, 1944. ly r ??? ' ?rawmmm?mmi wr JEQWTMTir. Hpnrumbnrg IMfttrlct, 8oath Carolina. R. T. Sims and u ifo and others ) Bill for the partition as. > of land. Or. Ramuel Ri?wU? ? . . -? J J IT appearing to ray satisfaction that the defendant Dr. 8amuel 8noddy resides from and without die limits of t thia State, on motion of Henry Sc Dean Complainant's 80L liritorK it ia ordered that he do appear within three months from the pnldication of this rulo and plead answer or de( mur to this hill or the same will he taken pro confttoo. . ~" J. t ft STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, x s|?rUllb|ifg vifllir'aCi. IN THE COURT OF ORDINARY. Wn.t.fam PAaats, Applicant, J ts. ( Summon" in 1 LAMaroan Cantrkli, and i I'artitioo. 1 others, defendants. ' ! TT spp^ering to my aatisfaction that Nimrod Canlrell, 1 X Abraham Can troll, Caleb Centre 11, and Isaac Purtlo, . four of the defendants In this cose; reside from and without the limits of thia State, It is therefore ordered, tluit ' they do appear and object to the division or sale of th? * real estate of Mary CantreU, deceased, on or before the ") 20th day of September next, or their consent will be tafo ? en pro eonfetto. L < v A < S. BO"WDEN, O. *. D. I June 10. 1*4*. 26-3p 1 ~ jroncjE. J "1R.CY Health having been very poor for several months q IxX past, 1 Hud it heeessary Coir me t? (ravel North, hi T ?? .-v -^_t- u/*. * * ? ?; ... ivgna *! ywpwwBpgy, MM all my Note* and Book Accounts, made before Mr. Jndd joined ' irnt in business, in the bead* df Kt C. LwtMr, Esq., to settle for me, rihI I hope thnae indebted will tneke imme> . dintc jmvinent, m I do not wish to run them to coot; yet neoOMity will compel me to collect ell the money dn* me this fall, without distinction of person*. 1 R. W FOLORB. \ July 14, 1844. 30 1 ?- ? 1 1,1 E * g T^K IT QRTIAlNED. By the Town Council of the Town 1J of Spartanburg, That any person or persona who ahull wilfully and knowingly discharge any gun, pistol, or other r small arms, within four hundred yards of the Public Square, - shall, ouch and ?*verr "Hence against this ordinance, i pay a fine of five dollar*. Ratified in Council, Juno 18, ' \M4. rt Constitution. " Paaeed on th? lMh day V ftartmbdr, iir the year of our Lord ?m a^paaml eight- fc?Mda*g|0p!110(1 now ?* tW Given under myha(|d and the aeal m' the State, the day and year abova written. XV M. F. ARTHUR, .p. ?- ??* . - , , ?13? more Cheap Goods. . (JUST HECE1VED THIS HAY,J TUSCAN, Straw, Lawn, and Wilton Ihnmrti, Wilton Hood*, of ovary quality and almpe. Al*o, Georgia Nankeen, Gingham*, *tn!e and mixed llnwi, ?ilk Velvet, worsted Siergr, Dimity Collar*, India Rubbei1', Mitt*, bTk. and fancy, Parasol*, mourning Printa, Victoria Plaid*, (a Itcautifiii article for rltildreu'* wear,) also a few baga Cof. fee, (10 lb* per $1.) All of the above cheap for Cask. ALFRED TQLLK80N. may 8?20 ly ,7~ 8. B. DEAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW. WILL PRACTICE in Paulding, C?m, Cherokee, Forayth, Lutnkiu, Union, (iilntoro, Murruy, Cliatoga, Floyd, Dade, and Walker Comities. ?RESIDENCE? Cliatooga Co., Georgia. March 6, 1844. ly S. llobo Sc E. . Lciiner, ATTORRfctS AT LAW AND SOLICITORS IN ' . . EQUITY. HAYF. formed ft Co-jmrto?r?hip in the practice of their Profession, and will attend to any buitinera entrusted to them in the Court* of Law and Equity for Spartanburg, Union, Enormia and Greenville. Office at Spartanburg, 1st door East of the Court Moose. January 17 th, 1844,?4? "'"' J' ? - ' . e i HEIVRY 4 DEAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW ?$ SOLICITORS IN EQUITY, (Smut an actio C. H.) TMF. nmlersijrniHi will practice in co-partnership in Law and Equity Tor the District of Spartanburg, and' will attend the Courts for Union, Lnurens, and Greenville.? Their Clients uiay be assured of the woe prompt attention thoy have ever bestowed on busbies# for the Inst twenty years. They may be found at the office lately occupied by Henry St Bobo. J AS. KDWD. HENRY, H.J. DEAN. Spartanburg, February 7, 1844, W. C. feENNETT, Drhtwt. RE8IDENCE at Hiram Mitchell's?performs all operations in Dentistry. Htti'^m^Ia^Hre^Sfmel^iMrfii's Teeth. | r>|Mtn?n?urgf JHiiunry I, 1844. 3n F)I. LKC.G hw Seen commissioned by the Kxeeutiro to act a* a Magistrate, to fill the vacancy occasioned l>y die promotion of R. Bowden, Esq. to 'ho oflke of OrMAIL ARRANGEMENT, \ SPARTANBURG COURT HOUSE, S. C. f Columbia and Cbarloeton Mail arrive# every Betaeday aad Wednesday, at night. Columbia ana Churl eaten Malt departs Tuesday and Friday. 5 A. M, Kutherfnrdton.N. C. Mail, arrives Monday night and Friday moruiaf Departa, Wednesday night and Sunday | flreettvffle and Sen the rn, arrivea Wednesday and Saturday, frP.M. |.Greenville and Southern, daneru tfcawha ?J J | 8 A.M. " ^ Linrx>liiUm, W. C. arrive* Wednesday and Saturday, 7 P.M. I' < ? ; * . " depart* Thursday ? Monday, 8 A. M. York villa, 8. ?,, ?r?vM Wednesday, t P. M. ' * ,,4 ." " deporta Thursday, 5 A. M. Union C. H., 8, C.r arrive* Tuesday, 4 P. M. " depart* Monday, 8 A. M. Lauren* C. H. vln Woodruff, arrive* Tueaday, 19 M" " depart* Saturday, 3 P. M. Lauren* C. H. via PoolesviUe, arrive* Tuesday, 18 at aifkt. *? " " depart* Mot day. 4 A. M. Lino atone. N.C.via Poole*ville, arrive* Saturday, 8 P. M. u " " r'apart* Wednesday, 8 a. *. The Mail win be elosed in future, at 7 o'clock, P. M., person* wlshiuft to Mail Letter* will p'eare deliver them betnre that tbne. or they will remain in the Poat OfKqo no til the next Mail kayos. Thia Rule will ba *trictk mdherred to. , if. W. II. UTAi, P M. Vebroarv 1*?, 1611.1 . i .