? Correspondence of the Mercury. Wasuixgto . ?mt. C, 1850. The holders of Texan bo ve .at length tiiuntphed iu the House of iteprescntativea.? Notwithstanding the rejxytted defeats of the Tea Million Monster in that body, its friends j>ersisted iu asserting confidently that it would be ultimately successful, and the verification of their predictions demonstrates most conclusively that they were possessed of the ways and means of ascertaining, and, pe-iaps, of determining, the views and wishes of those whose action would control the result, and make the i prediction of to-day, the history of to-morrow. Shortly after the adjournment yesterday, it was rumored that the Speaker would this morning reverse his decision; that the bill could not be reconsidered a second time, and telegraphic despatches .to that effect were sent off* to the Northern cities. 'Ihis morning, however, it was understood that the bill had been "made ^Jife" during the night?a change having been effected in the opiniomrof some who had voted against it, and it would therefore not be necessary for the Speaker to reverse his decision, as it could be ovprruied by a. majority. When the IJouse nie^fit was apparent from the cool and confident bearihg of the leading advocates ot the itieosure, that they felt assured of having the game in their bands, and the countenances and conduct of some of those who yesterday voted against the bill afforded unerring indications of the men and measures by which it was secured. At 12 o'clock the consideration of the Texas 0?"f--" "'?o raotimorl the nendiuff QU0S UUUUuaij uiu niw ivguiuv., ?- , ? M tion being an appeal by Mr. Howard ol Texas, from the decision made yesterday by the Speaker, that the motion to reconsider was not in order, the bill having been already reconsidered. The Speaker stated, at some length, the grounds of his decision, to which he still adhered. Mr. Howard appealed from the decision, and stated ^that the object of his motion to reconsider was, that he might offer an amendment to the bill striking out that portion directing that five millions of the proposed indemnity toTexasshould be funded for the benefit of a portion of her creditors. He wished to place all the creditors of Texas on the same basis, and to give to her the power of dividing the money equitably among them, whereas by the arrangement in the bill, a-portion of the creditors were secureo to the full amount of their claims to the exclusion of others, while the State would be compelled to repudiate at least three millions of her public debt He concluded by moving the previous question. A motion was made to lay the appeal on the table, which was rejected, yeas 77, noes 123. The question was then taken on sustaining the decision of the Chair, and the result was, yeas 83, noes 123. So the decision of the Speaker was overruled, and the question being next taken on the motic h to reconsider the vote by which the bill was rejected, it \ was. carried in the affirmative, yeas 122, noes 84. The bill was again before the House, and a hundred members started to their feet, and " showed "Mr. Speaker 1" but as the floor could .^.-wmly be given to one. ii-jj'**'-. iwtgnerf to Mr. Howaad?*? irtTdse management the bill seemed to be entrusted by its friends. And the result v proved that their confidence was weii bestowed. He said he would have preferred ij have offered the amendment of which he gave notice, but as the friends of the bill desired him not to do so, he would accede to their wishes, and would move that the bill be put upon iU third reading, and called for the previous question. He was appealed to, from many quarters, to withdraw the call for the previous question, nt refused, and the House seconded the derr.i-d, yeas 103, noes 91. The decisive question was now put on ordering the bill to a third reading, and the answers in calling the roll were looked for and noted with the closest scrutiny. A number of members declined answering to their names, and when the roll was called through it was known that they had the fate of the bill in their hands. Their intended course was not long a matter nf doubt fit was anticioated by many) and one after another, Mr. Stanton and Mr. Thomas of Terifnessee, and Mr. Stanton (brother of the former} and Mr. Mason of Kentucky, and Mr. Howard of Texas, all of whom had voted against the bill yesterday, rose and had their viuuues recorded in favor of it. The Speaker then announced the result of the vote, yeas JOS, noes 98, which was responded to by stamping of feet and clamping of hands in the galleries. This produced much excitement and tumult on the floor, and there were many calls on the Speaker to have the galleries cleared, but after some time order was restored, aud the bill was put upon its passage, and was passed, yeas 107, uoes 97. There was then much shaking of ; hands and congratulations among its friends, and-Messrs. Foot? and Cass of the Senate seemed especially delighted at 4l.u ?a... ?? (flfcnit ?ti snmejiine, to proceed to the consideration of other business', but excitement and agitation were too generally prevalent permit the members to give proper attention to matters of minor inter est, and a motion to adjourn wus carried by a large majority. The bus nes3 in the Senate was unimportant, a gr^at portion of the day being devoted to the discussion of the Bounty Laud Bill, and the body adjourned over until Monday. From the Auguxta Republic. The following interesting correspondence between some citizens of Burke uud the Hon. J. McPhersou Berrien, it ado ds us pleasure to lay before our readers and the public. Alrxandeu, Ga. Aug. 10, 1850. Sir: Fully impressed with the belief that your deliberately expressed opinions, upon the principles involved in this crisis of our public affairs, would exercise a most momentous influ ence upon t!ie distracted counsels of the State, wo have taken the liberty of intruding upon your leisure moments. In propounding the following questions for your consideration, we propose to make such a disposition of your reply, (should you deem them worthy of one,) as you, in your mature judgment, may consider moat conductive to the public interests. We feel no hesitation in expressing our decided conviction, that a public expression of opinion, on \oirpart, would be directly instrumental in harmonising the conflicting views prevailing to so g.e :t an extent in the State of Georgia. This conviction thus forced upon'our minds, must be our apology for the liberty we have taken.? Allow us to express our highest approbation of the stand you have taken in our behalf. ? 1. If the bill reported to the Senate by the committee of thiiteen, known as the compromise bill, had become a law of the land, could slavery have been extended to the Territories acquireil from Mexico 1 2. Will not the claim "that Congress has the right, and it is its duty to legislate to protect slavery in the Territories," yield by implication **? fA lofn'clnfa *wrntr?cf if? uic |?r.v<-. ..J .v6.=.?.v^ ? ... 3. If tlu? constitution confers "the right of slavery to enter ami occupy the territories of the United States," will the"demand upon Congress to recognize that light in any and every territorial hill, be inconsistent with the doctrine of non-intervention t In submitting these questions to your coiw, si deration, to be decided upon, in the premises, | according to your discretion, we have the honor to be, very respectfully, Jambs H. Royal, Jos. A. Sheuhake, Rich'd S. Scruggs. Hon, Jno. McPberson Berrien, U. S. S. Washington, Aug. 31, 1850. Grntlbmrn : Laboring under disposition, and pressed by engagements, 1 have not until now been able to answer your letter. Presuming you have kept a copy of it, I do not restate your questions?accept the following answers: 1. If the Compromise bill >huuld pass, slavery will be excluded from California, by the provision of her Constitution, to which Congress will have given validity; as to Mexico and Utah, it will depend upon the question whether the Mexican laws arc in force. 1 hold that they are not They are superseded by our owo as soon as a Territorial Government is organized; but others entertain, or profess to entertain, a different opinion, and the doubt thus evinced will prevent slaveholders from carrying tlieir property there to eucounter law suits.? Congress ought, therefore, to insert in any act which they pass on this subject, a clause, stating that the laws of Mexico are not iu' force in those territories. We have hitherto sought to obtain this iu vain?a declaratory clause. 2. I could answer this question generally in the negative. Congress has authority, in vari ous cases, to pass laws in attirinance and tor me protection of existing right, while it no has powerto annul them. Freedom of the press, trial by jury, the right to be exempt from unreasonable seizures and searches, with others, are constitutional rights. Congress may p?ss laws to facilitata the enjoyment of these rights, while they have no authority to annul or abridge them.? So, if the right to hold slaves is a constituiional right, the power to remove any obstructions to its enjoyment in the common territories of the Union would not draw after it the power to prevent its enjtiiymenfc-^here. In a word, Congress may legislate for the protection of a right guaranteed by the Constitution, but they cannot legislate io destroy it 3. The doctrine of non-intervention is not applicable to the present state of things. Clayton's compromise bill proposed to establish Territorial Government for all the Territory acquired from Mexico. The effect of it would have been to have opened the whole to the decision of the Supreme Court It was to such a case only that non intervention could apply. But if Mr. Clay's compromise bill sluuld pass Congress would intervene by that very act, to prohibit slavery, in the most important and valuable part of the commou Territory?for all agree that the people who chanced to bo in California, had no right to declare this prohibition and that their act is entirely null and void until Congress shall give it life and validity.? It is the same thing as if Congress had imposed the proviso themselves. If California is admitted with her present constitution, Congress will have intervened against the South, and cannot therefore with any show of justice plead nonintervention as an excuse for withholding from the South, any act which may be necessary to protect her in the enjoyment of her Constitutional rights. I hope these answers will be sufficiently explicit to put you in possession of my opinionsaud while 1 believe that you attach too much imoortance to them 1 have not felt myself at liberty to with-hold them. In tlie present posture ot'our affairs, 1 am very anxious that my fellow citizens of Georgia should thoroughly understand their position, and mingling an ardent love of the Union, with an unalterable determination to assert their equal rights under the Constitution, should calmly and steadily contemplate the consequences which may result from the decision which they may adopt 1 shall be glad to learn that this letter has rwrctwl^Hi. yourg^ _ J 1>1 a ceil cbs' ndkhri kn. Messrs- James H. Koyal, Joseph A. tiheumake, and Richard Scruggs. Counting the Cost.?The Washington correspondent of a northern paper advises the Congress, men of that section who are driving the south to des|>eration to examine the cost of their adventure. Quoth he: "Texas will attempt treason. A sort of civil war will begin. The whole South in sympathy, if not in arms, will he with Texas. The United States troops must be summoned, and tluy must be summoned from the North. Is Massachusetts ready to go ? Is Rhode Island, or Connecticut, or Vermont, or New York ?? The credit of the Federal Government will be shaken. United States stocks will tumble like bricks. Let extra sessions of State Legislatures then he called, and then be asked from New York, 820,000,000 Massachusetts 12,000,000 Connecticut, 8,000,000 Bhode Island, 4,000,000 Vermont, 4,000,000 Maine, 6,000,000 New Hampshire, 4,000,000 868,000,000 These credits will all be necessary, and it is quite time, if madness i3 the rule, that the madmen call the Legislatures together, and begin to raise the cash. He also states that Col. Monroe has 1,700 men in and about Santa Fe, commanded in part by Southern officers; but that if the Sobthern States take sides with Texas, the Northern _ branch of the coalition should provide for the mischief they are brewing, by an increase of the army to 100,000 men, and a loan of 8100,- p 000,000. This mode of argumentation is intended for the men who onposed the recent omnibus?the C( writer supposing that it was a measure desidererated by the South. The argument will hold good, however, when applied with a better knowledge of Southern opinion. NORTH CAROLINA. . J! The Raleigh Standard, in some strictures on p Senator Badger's recent speech in the Senate, a! has the following patriotic remarks. We have ci no fears but when the day of trial comes North n Carolina will be found battling for the consti- " tutlo'nnl rights pf tKe South: "The people of North Carolina are devotedly attached to the Union. They have accustomed themselves to look upon the Constitution g with pride and reverence, as a rich legacy from their fathers, and as the noblest monument of their wisd m. They would regard the dissrr-- lutiun of the Union as among the greatest of * evils; hut not the greatest?there is one great- | er?submission to r. government of unlimited 11 authority; and such a government ours would h undoubtedly bo if the opinions declared by Mr C Badger should obtain generally among the poo t] pie of the States, and become the setded puliey ( of the Government. North Carolina is wedded ,, to the Union, but when the terms of the inarri- j. age contract are violated?when her friendly remonstrances are treated with contempt? ' when she perceives a settled policy on the part of Government to degrade her in common with the other Southern States?when her rights are trampled in the dust and there is no hope that a returning sense of justice will see her { righted, though like Hagar she should go forth ^ destitute and forlorn, with tearful eyes and saddened heart, still she neither can nor -will ramain, at the sacrifice of her rights and honor. ^ She has honestly hoped for the best; but now f she begins to fear that her forbearance has been t mistaken for timidity; and her peaceable and t law-abiding people are daily settling down into i th'. belief that she must take a bolder and a < more decided stand, and their minds are becom- j j iug prepareil for exigencies which too probably , I will arise. He gentle spirit, roused to desper- ' | atiou, begins to know something of "The rem joy which warriors leel When gazing on the glittering steel!" She will never consent to buying peace, as re- ' commended by Mr. Badger, in agreeing to an 1 increase of the Tariff to protect Northern man- 1 ufacturers, on condition that they shall no more 1 molest us about slavery. She will never con- < sent to pay "black mail" No I her cry, as if s old, is?millions for. defence, but not one cent j f?r tribute." "ltSbOTTCls Blraagelyin the wu|;iv rest. Let the Association ho formed immediately. Farmer and Planter. Will Messrs. Seaborn & Oilman oblige us by stnr'ing the August number of their excellent' papurl Our number has been lost, which renders th. file incomplete. We take occasion again to recommend this useful Agricultural monthly to the patronage of our [>ur friends. It is published at Pendleton, at one dollar per annum. Judge Lumpkin. , / Wn coo it otulinl thuf Tn rJnro I i>f Honr. WW u ovu II liiuiou IIIUI v JJUUl|/nill) HI v?w??ia, is to deliver the Address before the Annual fyir, which is held soon in Charleston. Now, we iiihesitatingly veto the selection. It is, or at least purports to be, a Southern Fair, and for that Teaion, should have no half-tinged abolition lecturer jeforc it A man who would not sign the Soutli:rn address two years ago?who takes ground igainst the Nashville Convention, against the Maton Convention, and all similar Conventions, vhich have for their object the defence of Southtrn Rights. We refer to his letter to a Union neeting in reference to the Macon Convention.? fCharleston is to become the scene of Abolition ectures, and the Fair to be subservient to that jurpose, why, we go in for a secession from both he Fair and Charleston. py A correspondent of the Evening News, vrites from Washington, that owing to the apprelension of the removal of the Seat of Govern iicuif 111 uiu ^au D^aiccij uc ouiu. Death of Bishop Bascomb. Bishop Bascomb, of the M. E. Churcli Soutli, lied at Louisville, Ky.. on Saturday last ?j^"The President has signed the California ind Utah, and the Texas and New Mexico bills. 1 rhe Senators and Representatives of the mon;rels of California were admitted to their seats on ruesday. Abolitionism in Texas. A correspondent of the Picayune, writing from ' Austin, Texas, says? " The Mexican population n the Valley of the Rio Grande are strong aboli- , iotiists, and the same facilities arc afforded to furtive slaves to make their escape as exists on any < lortion of the Ohio river. The valley of the Nue- i 1 r' i r' ii es is fast fitJing^jp \yitb a population oppfcfB to lavery^and the day is not distant*wlwti they will ecome .^inerically strong enough to Carry a kjn;itudinafdivision of the State, making the wesem division ft Free Soil State." . ?5f*Who can calf.Byron, or juiy. jftan an Infi' lei, who could pen such lines, containing- such e;:hinentB as the following! "Fain.would I fly the haunts of men.. I seek to shun, not hate mankind; JWy breast retire* the.siillen glen,Whose glootn mRy sliit a. dflrkeoed.mind?Oh! that to me the WmgH Were given, Wliich bear the turtle .to her nest. , Then would I cleave the vault of heaven* To flee away and be at rest 1 ' r,f If.. .1 r .? .1 ~-C7~ >ve cup idb following oamticiitumtt iruci crittetv to the edkor of the Washington Union by m old and influential cftiseh'Of Eufala, Alabama, t tells, in plain language, the determinant!, bfthn South, and wiU teach lovers of the Unio^a^ th^" < sacrifice of our rights, that the feeling of rejjpJu-r ion and resistance is not confined to So^Ithf '?ro?" inn, or the young bloods only, of other " Were the South in the majoiity, nod were' die to pass a law that no -machinery should he~ carried to California to he used iHthe-ofcfctlh'' ng of pure gold, the whblb North WouMcry" cat, Perjury:lhe vhnle Smith hatpprjurtrftfar*'. r 'Ires! The whole North would declare off from such a government or such a Upton to then;: And are more-degraded or less independent tha \ we fh;\v ? I hnp? not. My. old' friend, I have glorjed in being an American citizen as much as yon or any other man; but I declare to you that l am now ashnrnW of it? If the south submits and remain in the Union, I shall want to h'ave it. Theomnibus b$rwoold no- iiave answered the purpose,; ^'h^^pteth would not have been satisfied.- X wasagainst South Carolina nullification; hut the present Mate we are in is a very, different one. Jf am an old tnan and deprecate war as much as any man not a slave. Yet rather thart Wed outrageously imposed upon, and oar childrejj/orever in bondage, I say let it come?let iTcome. I In licve this is the general sentiment of. tins Southern country?if the North is deipr^ifJ? d to h vo war, she can have it to Her hearts con* tint, and tt the injury if not ruin, of the.wholo XT?.u ?i 'Pu? ?,;fi cuuuu v, nuiui nviu kjuiiw, ruv bus ifim iiu? be ours. " -Wh n the wicked rnle^ the-peop/e in ." As t >, slavery, if I beliovechita sin, I wnu'd try to get clear of it as soon as possible; n r do I Udieve they would be better off it free, under all the circumstances. They believe it, and many of themdo not desire a change, "I have written;this much as a friend-rand one who has stuck to you because Ujeljeved in you?uot for publication, hut for .your private use. ' 'Tis useless for Mr. Clay, or1 the whole North, to cry out treason, treason: the Sonth heeds it not. Washington and ourhrevblutioiia y fathers o to record an iinfortunato^vent/ s^3/thc;' Eiigefield Advertiser. Mr. Steven St^necksr, of this District was killed on Thursday' evening last, at Fivelan i's St "re, hy a hinw fcwh Thinnas F'arker. It appears that' Parker and Stalnecker wiiro tmd: in ft fioht wlio.ii abrdtlier - >f Stal nockor sf il f c F Parker in the -Jwk. Parker and deceiiJAf wore thetu par&flI barker perceiving tiint hp ha I been stabbed},seized a piece of plank lying W, and gave tfio> deceased ablow on the teutplp, whichsjCjiusedlIiuTdeath. Slavbs Ru.wixe LIomk A 04 Dataware Gazette suites that 11 lie;seven'staves who. some time since ran lUwy frbm Mr. Calveit^ off Prince George's cnunty)-'app1ied at the wafcel'bhouse for lodgings, intfihYeity a few night?, since, stating that they bad been.to.Pennsylvania, were tired of freedom, and were trying to. get back to" their master.' The stated that thev had been decoyed off by a white man, whose name they did not know,i>y specious promises, and delusive hopes, hod that they much preferred living, with Mr. Calvert as his slaves than to lead "the life theydidaflertb^^ched their destination, and desired to;beapnt'horne. The mayor h?d thorn lodged iti the jailat New Castle. and sent a despatch by telegraph to. their, owner, who bad them removed to His home. . " ' Bail. Sun. H vDR'UMiom.v.?Late evidences prove that a DUG H'om a rui is.puisoaouB. .A-utuercmopiiiion prevailed heretofore, and it, wis generally supposed- thaf, no more injury- resulted from it than from the bite any other animal, when not aflecteifwith-hydrppho^ja.. Last week we recorded an instance of deatb,-prbduccd bv the bite of a rat; a m^jn holding a rat by the tail, had his thumb bitt en and poifconed - the* poison spread rapidly, ahd?a)lefforts to stay itsprogress to tho vital,parts proving unavailing,, lie died. From injury drom the bite of a rati we always imagined dogl to be wholly exempt. It appears wo erfdd, as tlie^Ciucionati Enquirer * of the 23dul t publishes'ali 'tfctount of a dog,, which became rabid by t^e bite of-a rat.' Ttie owner thought he discovered symptoms of hydrophobia in his dog and chained him tip, and on the following day fie wis decidedly mad and obliged to he killed. Might not the Symptoms of hydrophobia boproduced^by other causes than the bite of the ratk Perhaps the dog was inkammm i.hJaii 4kn -? - - - - . f iL ^ Luuuritig unuui uic Kiviipuriirbwigets ui uic uw ease at the time of being, bitten. If otherwise, then rat dogs,-when engaged in the slangier of their natural-enemy, will be subjected to much ritk.-* Daily Orleanian.